Do You Have Mayweather In Your Top 100 ATG List?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

In what sense?

That Duran was actually campaigning at WW for 2 whole years before facing Leonard and had a win over Carlos Palomino a win at WW that is greater than any win JMM and Hatton had/has at WW?

If that's the apples and oranges, by all means I agree.

Because, the fact is...It's quite silly to try and compare Leonard win over Duran to Floyd wins over JMM and Hatton.

No I was agreeing with you and iron.

[IronDanHamza]

Apples and Oranges really.

Well, not really.

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

Apples and Oranges really.

In what sense?

That Duran was actually campaigning at WW for 2 whole years before facing Leonard and had a win over Carlos Palomino a win at WW that is greater than any win JMM and Hatton had/has at WW?

If that's the apples and oranges, by all means I agree.

Because, the fact is...It's quite silly to try and compare Leonard win over Duran to Floyd wins over JMM and Hatton.

Well, not really.

[badass316]

Put him next to Oscar? WTF.

Is debatable that Floyd is top 50 ATG

It's debatable if Oscar is top 100 ATG.

They're not close at all.

Come on now, lets not hate get the best of our judgment. DLH is a lot closer to 50 than he is to 100 on the ATG. He may not be on your list because of your bias towards him but he will be on several notable boxing historians' list.

[Spray_resistant]

IDK I doubt any of you have watched enough old fights including hundreds maybe over a thousand of the best fighters ever which you would need to do in order to make a list like that anyway.

[badass316]

PBF is top 100. My guess is that he'll be around the 40-60 range, considering that he'll never fight Pacquiao and will endure a lifetime of criticism that will surely affect his standings on the list. PBF will most likely be the greatest example of "what could have been" in boxing, in the sense of not taking the fights he should have.

[jrosales13]

Come on now, lets not hate get the best of our judgment. DLH is a lot closer to 50 than he is to 100 on the ATG. He may not be on your list because of your bias towards him but he will be on several notable boxing historians' list.

Blasphemy...If you really believe that, then obviously you do not know enough about the history of the sport.

[badass316]

Blasphemy...If you really believe that, then obviously you do not know enough about the history of the sport.

Are you being serious or sarcastic?

[jrosales13]

Are you being serious or sarcastic?

That's what I'm trying to figure out about your post.

It seems to me that you're being serious. And, if you're then obviously you do not know really about the history of the sport. And, all the great fighters of the past.

[BigStereotype]

Beating Marg does nothing now for his legacy or resume. That ship has sailed, it would have done great 2-5 years ago. But, now? Nah beating him doesn't move Floyd up at all even with a win on top of Pac. And, is getting to the point where a win over Cotto does nothing either.

I said if he had beaten Margarito and Cotto. I agree, that period is over. There's nobody around (besides Pacquiao) who's really a great fight for him.