Educate me on the Klitchko Brothers. What Hall of Famers have they beat?

[check hook]

I actually think Wladmir will be a top 10 ATG great when it's all over. Greater resume wise than Dempsey/Tyson for sure.

Wlad's resume isn't better than Tyson's. That's ridiculous.

[Simurgh]

lewis avenged both. Beat all the comp. out there.

holyfield earned his spot because he fought everone much. greater comp than the klits put together.

tyson destroyed everyone he fought until douglas. We all know he wasnt the same after he lost cus.

Wlad avenged Brewster as well. Beaten all the comp as well. Fought 60+ times (much greater chance of loosing if you fight more times regardless who you fight).

Holyfiled lost 10 times, including Byrd who was demolished by Wlad.

So what if Tyson destroyed everyone prior to Douglas, he still was KOed and lost a few more times after it too.

Wlad is ATG. Deal with it!

[Simurgh]

Wlad's resume isn't better than Tyson's. That's ridiculous.

Actually it is.

Tyson lost 6 times, including bums like Williams and McBride. Was beaten two times by Holyfield. The best win on his resume is past prime Holmes.

We can't pretend those fight didn't happen because Tyson was 'not the same'. That is the part of his legacy.

I agree he was a beast during his prime and that he would beat just about any fighter, but that's not the same as a resume.

[BattlingNelson]

lewis avenged both. Beat all the comp. out there.

He drew with those two clubfighters. It's 1-1.

tyson destroyed everyone he fought until douglas. We all know he wasnt the same after he lost cus.

So you are arguing that Tyson's opposition pre Douglas was much better than what is available today? "peeleft:

[yoz]

Wlad avenged Brewster as well. Beaten all the comp as well. Fought 60+ times (much greater chance of loosing if you fight more times regardless who you fight).

Holyfiled lost 10 times, including Byrd who was demolished by Wlad.

So what if Tyson destroyed everyone prior to Douglas, he still was KOed and lost a few more times after it too.

Wlad is ATG. Deal with it!

Great post.

Totally agree.

[DreamFighter]

Wlad's resume isn't better than Tyson's. That's ridiculous.

what you actually meant to say was that Tyson's championship resume far exceeds Wlads championship resume, which is rrevocably true.


In fact Tysons champ. resume dwarves Wlads in the same way Wlad dwarves his choice of midget, fatboy and unskilled opponents. No ATG champions picks their opponents like that.

[thuggery]

Wlad is without a doubt an ATG and HOF'er. Wlad tears apart any HW from any era.

[DreamFighter]

He drew with those two clubfighters. It's 1-1.

I guess we'll never know if Wlad could have avenged his losses because he ran scared ****less when it did happen, hiding from middling Brewster till he got old and planning on doing the same with an ordinary thumper Corrie Sanders. Oh no, my bad, Corrie already was old when he destroyed prime Wlad.

[DreamFighter]

Wlad is without a doubt an ATG and HOF'er. Wlad tears apart any HW from any era.

based on what evidence? I cant see any except for a claim to career longevity, for which he hasn't yet set a HOF record.

[prinzemanspopa]

It's laughably pathetic how so many dullards use the term "hall of famer" as if being inducted into that organization is the only way a fighters worth is validated.