Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does anyone still think the old time heavyweights were too small to be competitive in the modern era?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    The guy is allergic to logic I’m afraid.

    In his response he’ll just repeat his point again. Bank on it.​
    Bronson66

    I told you on page 1

    Here we are on page 29 doing exactly what I said.
    Bronson66 Bronson66 likes this.

    Comment


      Why is everyone mentioning Ali?

      Both versions the '67 lightening fast dancing master or the early 70's stronger more battle hardened fighter would be favoured over every heavy or superheavy that ever lived.

      The poster who favours 185 pound Marciano over everyone stated that Usk was small, not me.

      I said RELATIVELY.

      At 225 now he is a huge man.



      Mr Mitts Mr Mitts likes this.

      Comment


        Usyk is the exception not the rule.
        How many small men have been victim to size differences ? Why would pre historic small boxers with literally no skills achieve what Usyk achieved?
        Anomalocaris Anomalocaris likes this.

        Comment


          Originally posted by YGriffith View Post
          Usyk is the exception not the rule.
          How many small men have been victim to size differences ? Why would pre historic small boxers with literally no skills achieve what Usyk achieved?
          They wouldn't.

          The idea that relative midgets like 185 pound Marciano (despite all the mythology) could outmuscle men 50 - 80 or so pounds heavier makes no sense.

          From the late 80's (when Tyson was champ) with modern nutrition (another stone or so) only Liston, Ali, Foreman and Holmes would have great careers.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Anomalocaris View Post
            Why is everyone mentioning Ali?

            Both versions the '67 lightening fast dancing master or the early 70's stronger more battle hardened fighter would be favoured over every heavy or superheavy that ever lived.

            The poster who favours 185 pound Marciano over everyone stated that Usk was small, not me.

            I said RELATIVELY.

            At 225 now he is a huge man.


            When I pointed out to Apples that Usyk added all that muscle to be successful at the higher weight,he made the ludicrous claim that Usyk is now PORKY!
            Anomalocaris Anomalocaris likes this.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Bronson66 View Post

              When I pointed out to Apples that Usyk added all that muscle to be successful at the higher weight,he made the ludicrous claim that Usyk is now PORKY!
              I wish I was as 'porky'!

              Perhaps the perfect heavyweight is a walking skull on a stick?

              Comment


                Originally posted by Anomalocaris View Post
                Why is everyone mentioning Ali?

                Both versions the '67 lightening fast dancing master or the early 70's stronger more battle hardened fighter would be favoured over every heavy or superheavy that ever lived.

                The poster who favours 185 pound Marciano over everyone stated that Usk was small, not me.

                I said RELATIVELY.

                At 225 now he is a huge man.


                Well, that's precisely the point, isn't it?

                ShoulderRoll the thread starter is (still, despite being debunked in the first post of the thread) trying to claim Usyk is a small Heavyweight when he's the exact same size as Muhammad Ali, who is, not small.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post

                  LOL can't see that visual I actually like Zhang and think he's dangerous for anybody in the division right now. Ali was just two fast and Zhang would get punished.
                  That to me is exactly the point.
                  Bronson66 Bronson66 likes this.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                    Well, that's precisely the point, isn't it?

                    ShoulderRoll the thread starter is (still, despite being debunked in the first post of the thread) trying to claim Usyk is a small Heavyweight when he's the exact same size as Muhammad Ali, who is, not small.
                    - - Usyk is bigger than Ali when he was weighing 220+ with 15 being blubber. Usyk is also more dedicated and educated than was Ali yielding a higher IQ with a greater range of boxing arsenal...

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                      - - Usyk is bigger than Ali when he was weighing 220+ with 15 being blubber. Usyk is also more dedicated and educated than was Ali yielding a higher IQ with a greater range of boxing arsenal...
                      yeah the peds help him too don't they queeny? I think the scandal about to break about ukranien boxers and the widespread use of peds will surprise even you queeny!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP