Wladimir Klitschko is DUCKING James Toney!

[j]

1 heavily touted prospect (Booker) 1-0 (done with a torn bicep, by the way)

are you serious? when the hell did booker become a highly respected prospect?

[vB Martin]

are you serious? when the hell did booker become a highly respected prospect?

Tout
To promote or praise energetically; publicize

Respect
To feel or show deferential regard for; esteem

See the difference?

Learn the language. It will help you in your future.

[mECHsLAVE]

I correctly pointed out that your only contribution to this thread was off topic. Out of everything to comment on, you zero in on comments that upset you and decide to argue off topic because you have little to nothinf of value to say on topic.

You embarasssed yourself in the previous thread by completely mixing your facts up and ran out with your tail between your legs.

Here again you illustrate the topic upsets you and your only intention is to complain.






Once again you illustrate you have no idea what you're talking about and are completely missing the point.

The fight is a big is a big money fight in the landscape of Today's division. Toney brings much of that money because he's marketable. Fighting Wlad and allowing him a lion's share of the purse when his other option is to turn to a Brock like fighter for a fraction of the money is simple business.

There's more money to be made in this fight, and Wlad loses out if he looks to move on to a differnet fight. 1.5 Million is a low offer for the amount to be split up, and that's why there's a counter offer.

But again, after laugably suggesting I don't know how fights work, you contine to fail to understand none of this has been substantiated in the least.

All this says right now is that there are negotiations going on, and that's consistant with everything we've heard so far. That's how fights are made.

Once again, you write a book and have no point whatsoever and aren't able to refute one word of my post, but love to say I don't know what I'm talking about. LOL You're so predictable with your little whiny catch phrases: "You're pathetic" "You don't know what you're talking about" etc but never refute one word of my post with any substantial argument or fact. You just learned a couple catch phrases from reading lots of message boards and regurgitate them out of context, having no meaning whatsoever. LOL You are one amusing little son, Erkel.

You want to keep saying that Wlad should offer more money, because a Toney fight is so much bigger than a Brock fight. I think the fights are close right now, with a slight edge to Toney. I see that gap being closed even more if Brock is impressive beating the "other" Ibragimov. Remember fans watched Toney bounce around the ring looking like Grimace in his last fight- a boring, flabby, terrible performance. And they watched Brock win with a vicious KO in his. If Brock can perform big against Timur, then he's the #1 contender without question, and I'd be more impressed with a win over Brock than I would over Toney, by far. I think most fans may feel that way, also, and if Wlad-Brock is promoted correctly it could be a big fight.

I don't know why this is even being discussed. I already explained that Toney is just posing. He's not going to sign to fight Wlad in a career-ending fight with the promise of a much easier title shot with the Rahman/Maskaev fight guaranteed to him. That's all you need to know about this situation. I think Toney's counter-offers are for the press and a total pose. I think it would take 10 million to get James in the ring with Wlad. Watch and see.

[PBDS]

Again, in the past 5 fights
Toney
3 current or former World Champions (Holyfield, Rahman, Ruiz) 1-0-1 1 NC
1 heavily touted prospect (Booker) 1-0 (done with a torn bicep, by the way)
1 former prospect/contender (Guinn) 1-0

Little Klit
1 current World Champion (Byrd) 1-0
1 heavily touted prospect (Peter) 1-0
2 nobodies (TOS, Castillo) 2-0
1 fringe contender (Brewster) 0-1 (by devastating KO)



...Wow!!!!! I have seen some political nonsense from you before but this **** right here is the biggest stretch ever. Knowing that your a smart guy I can only assume that your just joking around with this stuff and playing devils advocate. Surely your way to smart to call Booker a heavily touted prospect and Brewster a fringe contender. Oh nevermind, of course your just ****ing around.

[vB Martin]

Again, in the past 5 fights
Toney
3 current or former World Champions (Holyfield, Rahman, Ruiz) 1-0-1 1 NC
1 heavily touted prospect (Booker) 1-0 (done with a torn bicep, by the way)
1 former prospect/contender (Guinn) 1-0

Little Klit
1 current World Champion (Byrd) 1-0
1 heavily touted prospect (Peter) 1-0
2 nobodies (TOS, Castillo) 2-0
1 fringe contender (Brewster) 0-1 (by devastating KO)



...Wow!!!!! I have seen some political nonsense from you before but this **** right here is the biggest stretch ever. Knowing that your a smart guy I can only assume that your just joking around with this stuff and playing devils advocate. Surely your way to smart to call Booker a heavily touted prospect and Brewster a fringe contender. Oh nevermind, of course your just ****ing around.

Before the Toney fight Booker was heavily touted as a prospect and undefeated.

Before the Little Klit fight, Brewster was barely noticed on anyone's radar and was intended as a confidence building fight. He had already lost to Shufford and Ettiene and had a big record built on soft opposition. In fact, those 2 losses represented the best fighters he had faced in his career.
Please don't try to act like he was/is a world class fighter.

[Bozo_no no]

Once again, you write a book and have no point whatsoever and aren't able to refute one word of my post

LOL!

Is your new tactic to takes everything YOU do and try to accuse me of it?

What a joke.

I pointed out you had nothing to say about the topic because you didn't. Out of everything said in this thread you decided to jump in off topic.

It's simple business. More money to be split up means there's more incentive to make an offer that ensures Toney is the opponent. Your notion that Brock is even in the salm league as far as money shows beyond a doubt that you're either completly ignorant, or following your usual course of saying something completely assinine in an attempt to save face.

Considering there's (apparently) been an offer and counter offer and no mention that talks have stalled or borken, this is going exactly as it should in regards to how fights are made.

As ususal, you do nothing but ramble, embarass yourslef, and add nothing relevent on the current topic.

[vB Martin]

Out of curiousity, I did a check.

In March of 2004, LameOne Brewster was not even in the WBC top 30, was Number 10 on the WBA list. The IBF doesn't give historical rankings that far beck. The WBO had him ranked #2 because he held the NABO belt.

Yeah, he was a highly ranked cntender, all right..

[GasPed]

When you couple this with the fact that Nandrolene stays in the system for well over a year, and the NYSAC lifted the suspension early because Toney tested negative for Nandrolene in the follow up test, it might just make it possible that Toney did not, in fact, juice for this fight.

Just a thought.

Uh, he already admitted taking steroids as part of his recovery from the Booker fight. So while your argument is interesting, it's also kinda irrelevant. Oh well.

[Bozo_no no]

Uh, he already admitted taking steroids as part of his recovery from the Booker fight. So while your argument is interesting, it's also kinda irrelevant. Oh well.

Please. Try and have a clue of what you're talking about befre you pipe in.

Nandrolone was the substance he tested positive for, and that which the body naturally produces in smaller qunataties.

The medication he was prescribed was .

It was stated at the hearing for the test by Toney's attourney:

"In my medical opinion, the direct cause of Mr. Toney's positive nandrolone test was the usage of pregnenolone, DHEA and somatotropin prescribed by Dr. Gordon during 2004 strictly for rehabilitative and healing purposes,"

"Steroids" is a broad term, and their dirivatives are used for all kinds of medicinal purposes.

[vB Martin]

Uh, he already admitted taking steroids as part of his recovery from the Booker fight. So while your argument is interesting, it's also kinda irrelevant. Oh well.

Except for the fact that Nandrolone is not a the****utic steroid for muscle/tendon tears. It is only used medically to treat anaemia, certain forms of breast cancer and osteoporosis.

The only reason he would have taken it is to increase muscle mass (though it's not overly effective for that) and to increase red blood cell count for increased endurance, though he could easily have used the marathoner's practice of blood doping for that. Blood doping is when you take blood out of your system, separate the red cels and store them, then reinject them prior to an even when you need extra endurance.