Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[torosboxing75]

LMAO!!! priceless

[GTTofAK]

And according to USADA (the direct source), they stated they didn't just 'find him with an IV', that they knew about it beforehand. That's the actual fact according to USADA.

You mean the USADA that told ESPN that only Morales A sample had tested positive and they were waiting on the B sample. The very next day it was revealed that Morales' A and B samples had both tested positive TWICE!

USADA has already been busted for lying in an unrelated case. You keep confusing facts with statements. USADA said X. The only fact is that USADA said X. That doesn't' make a fact. USADA has been caught lying in the past.

[bigfo0t]

Yep. Just as I suspected. The stench of butthurt.

The only ones who should be "butthurt" are the Floyd worshippers like you because he let you all down and proved to be a hypocrite and a fraud.

I could give a flying ***. You don't see me posting walls of text trying to defend this crap. Just calling it as I see it.

[b00g13man]

USADA claims that both Mayweather and Pacquiao were tested a total of 19 times. Assuming that Floyd did give urine before and after the banned IVs were administered, wouldn't he have an additional 2 drug tests on the report? Unless they urine tested Pacquiao as well, which is unlikely, seeing as how he didn't require banned IVs to rehydrate.

Mayweather gave urine on March 13, 18, 19 and 28, April 2, 10, 15, 21 and 27 and May 1 and 2. He gave blood samples on March 13, 18 and 28, April 2, 10, 15 and 21 and May 2.

Paquiao gave urine on March 14, 17, 23 and 24, April 1, 9, 16, 22 and 27 and May 1 and 2. Pacquiao gave blood samples on March 14, 17 and 24, April 1, 9, 16 and 22 and May 2.

The weigh in was on May 1. All they provided was dates samples were collected, not the number of times samples were collected on said says.

Are people really this dense? It's a really simple scenario without any complex logic involved. Christ!!!

[Deevel916]

It was always a non-story. It was a Hauser article. That was all I needed to know.

So why arent they suing Hauser for defamation? Surely an article like that can cause serious damage to their reputation.

The NSAC has also went on the record to state that USADA has failed to properly communicate with them on 3 different occasions where fighters tested dirty.

[GTTofAK]

That reporting doesn't say because it only specifies a number of times according to dates. Rather than a specific number of samples.

Face it there is not one piece of physical evidence that supports the claim that USADA was informed before hand.

We do know for a fact that USADA has lied in the past.

[b00g13man]

The only ones who should be "butthurt" are the Floyd worshippers like you because he let you all down and proved to be a hypocrite and a fraud.

I could give a flying ***. You don't see me posting walls of text trying to defend this crap. Just calling it as I see it.

Loooool. Let down? Floyd retired undefeated as the best fighter of his generation, and a bona fide ATG. There's literally nothing to be butthurt about. Even this smear campaign failed.

Life is fantastic for Floyd fans right now. You on the other hand don't come off as pleased for some reason.

[The Big Dunn]

I think the boxing fraternity is very close knit and doesn't take kindly to stuff like this. Hauser has submitted most of his points like 3 different times and it all quietly goes away.

Reports are that Floyd fights generate hundreds of millions for the Nevada economy. His fights are usually the 2 biggest events of the year. An investigation would focus on ODH, Floyd, Manny, Bob, Haymon, GBP, TR, USADA, HBO, Showtime, and NSAC-son that is a lot of money and power that a writer would be messing with.

[b00g13man]

Face it there is not one piece of physical evidence that supports the claim that USADA was informed before hand.

We do know for a fact that USADA has lied in the past.

And there's not one piece of evidence that proves the converse, so........

[GTTofAK]

And there's not one piece of evidence that proves the converse, so........

Notice how I said supports and you moved the goal post to proves. The TUE application both in its language and dates supports that USADA found out about the IV after the fact. In no way do they support the claim the USADA knew before hand.

USADA made the affirmative claim that they were notified before hand. Since you WADA's rules of TUE rules I posted you know full well that they are required to document everything. It should be easy enough for them to provide evidence where it true. To date they have provided no such evidence because it doesn't exist.