Originally posted by bigjavi973
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach: Cotto-Golovkin Would Have Be Closer To 154
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Foreign Soil View PostYou want no catchweight but you fully support Cotto's catchweights. Cry some more will you? Haven't you stopped bleeding yet?Originally posted by carloscruz10009 View PostWow even I didn't know that.... I don't like catch weights but I don't have a problem with cotto fighting GGG @ 54... He don't need that belt at 60 anyways... GGG a fraud... Teddy atlas went bonkers on him last night saying he hasn't beat anybody
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View PostMake the fight at 157lbs.
Three up for Cotto, three down for Golovkin.
Comment
-
I just remember why I dislike this guy, Freddie. The guy single handily resurreect the catch-weight fights. Roach, Cotto just fought Martinez at 160...why? I may now have to rescind my praises of Cotto's victory over Martinez, because you knew he was damage goods. I remember this was the same argument you used to keep Pac away from Floyd until it the whole Pac vs Floyd turned into one big soap opera.
Maybe Cotto really need to go back to 154.
Side note: I still can't respect Floyd's victory over Canelo.Last edited by megas30; 08-02-2014, 09:15 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NachoMan View PostWhy??? Isn't Cotto the goddamn middleweight champion now? Won't they be fighting for MW titles?? I am amazed how many people here still defend all of this catchweight bull****.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View PostNope did not say I supported the catchweights. I said that it has been done before plenty of times but all of a sudden cuz its GGG the ATG , the next GOAT its a freakin problem. But then when ward wants to fight ggg ya say "hes not in the same division doe." "the fight doesnt make financial sense doe." hypocrites.
Comment
-
Comment