Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Halls of Fame View Post
    sure you stopped reading there. before the fight everybody knew Bradley has high handspeed,
    excellent footwork a high ring IQ, all the heart in the world and a great chance of winning. And after the fight Bradley was just "another cherrypicked bum" . LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL


    He had NO feet dum dum. Pacquiao got schooled by a B+ level fighter with only 50% of his limbs working at full capacity.

    Pacquiao is beyond pathethic.
    Last edited by ArtThouFurious?; 06-11-2012, 07:04 AM.

    Comment


      Bradley got stung in this round, Bradley couldn't land anything clean. LMAO

      Comment


        wth I got time, i'm gonna do my own compubox for round 5

        editing in 10 minutes

        2:41 Over Hand right Bradley
        2:31 Counter left Pacquiao
        2:18 Right Jab Pacquiao
        2:09 Jab Pacquiao
        2:07 Jab Straight Combo Pacquiao
        1:59 Right Jab Pacquiao
        1:54 Jab Straight combo Pacquiao
        1:45 Straight right Bradley
        1:43 Right Jab Bradley
        1:29 Right cross Bradley
        1:30 Left counter Pacquiao
        1:20 Left Jab Bradley
        0:57 left Jab Bradley
        0:55 Counter Right pacquiao
        0:53 left Jab Bradley
        0:50 right Jab Pacquiao
        0:42 Left Jab Bradley
        0:31 Right Uppercut Pacquiao
        0:22 Right Hook Pacquiao

        I stopped at 0:22 and I dont even need to count the punches I tallied or count the punches in their flurry at the end of the round to know Pacquiao won this by a WIDE margin.

        Pacquiao landed ALL the effective shots and none of bradley punches had any power whatsoever.

        I thought it was closer before I started but now I have no doubt Pacquiao won this round. He landed ALL of the hard shots.
        Last edited by Paclan; 06-11-2012, 07:42 AM.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Flawless* View Post
          That is why Pacman lost right. Especially in the latter rounds, Bradley chose his natural instinct and fought more slicker and won the rounds more clearly. This proves that Pacman never wanted none of Mayweather, Bradley at 140 or Guzman or Nate. Just too much slickness for his one dimensional overrated ass

          Dominated him with one slick foot LMAO
          Troll. Look and watch the fight again. Every time Pac turn on the heat (1 minute before the round ends) he never miss his punches on Bradley's alien head and hurts him every time.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Halls of Fame View Post
            sure you stopped reading there. before the fight everybody knew Bradley has high handspeed, excellent footwork a high ring IQ, all the heart in the world and a great chance of winning. And after the fight Bradley was just "another cherrypicked bum" . LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
            whoever claimed bradley was a slick/skilled fighter was either a pac-tard trying hype up the fight or a bradley fan. i rate bradley high but it ain't for his skills or slickness. dude is a come forward fighter who leaves he chin open and throws wide punches. pac should've dominated him easy. be honest, you've never seen him fight and the only reason you call him "skilled" or "slick" is cause he's black.

            Comment


              Originally posted by jaestix1 View Post
              whoever claimed bradley was a slick/skilled fighter was either a pac-tard trying hype up the fight or a bradley fan. i rate bradley high but it ain't for his skills or slickness. dude is a come forward fighter who leaves he chin open and throws wide punches. pac should've dominated him easy. be honest, you've never seen him fight and the only reason you call him "skilled" or "slick" is cause he's black.
              Be honest, you've never seen him fight and the only reason you say he's a come forward fighter with little skill is because he fought Pacquiao.

              Comment


                @ TS, you realize this thread will be gone in no time right?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by jaestix1 View Post
                  whoever claimed bradley was a slick/skilled fighter was either a pac-tard trying hype up the fight or a bradley fan. i rate bradley high but it ain't for his skills or slickness. dude is a come forward fighter who leaves he chin open and throws wide punches. pac should've dominated him easy. be honest, you've never seen him fight and the only reason you call him "skilled" or "slick" is cause he's black.
                  bradley definitely can be slick, to what degree is another story, he isn't as slick as the top guys, mayweather, whitaker, locche etc

                  but watch the holt fight, he can definitely be elusive and hard to hit

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ArtThouFurious? View Post


                    He had NO feet dum dum. Pacquiao got schooled by a B+ level fighter with only 50% of his limbs working at full capacity.

                    Pacquiao is beyond pathethic.
                    Look at Pacquiao when he has a cramp, he can't move around like in and out as usual. Then look at Bradley who has a broken ankle but the he can jump around and riding his bicycle when Pac turns on the heat. lmao.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                      Be honest, you've never seen him fight and the only reason you say he's a come forward fighter with little skill is because he fought Pacquiao.
                      bradley is not skilled or slick he rarely fights off the back foot and he is not a counter puncher.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP