Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

[loui_ludwig]

That is Keith Kizer, i thought he would be older.

[IJ1]

pacquiao was not the effective aggressor or the ring general

I'd love to hear your definition of effective aggression and ring generalship.

If a fighter not only outlands, but also lands the harder shots and forces a normally forward-coming fighter to retreat... is that not effective aggression and ring generalship?

[-DSG-]

[QUOTE=IJ1;12236653]I'd love to hear your definition of effective aggression and ring generalship.

If a fighter not only outlands, but also lands the harder shots and forces a normally forward-coming fighter to retreat... is that not effective aggression and ring generalship?[/

pacquiao came forward almost the entire fight did he ever have bradley pinned on the ropes and just tee off on him? Was his jab ever consistently landing on bradley? Bradley controlled the pace and had pac stopping in the middle of the ring waiting for bradley to just brawl cause thats the only way manny could win!

[IJ1]

[QUOTE=-TITAN-;12236683]

I'd love to hear your definition of effective aggression and ring generalship.

If a fighter not only outlands, but also lands the harder shots and forces a normally forward-coming fighter to retreat... is that not effective aggression and ring generalship?[/

pacquiao came forward almost the entire fight did he ever have bradley pinned on the ropes and just tee off on him? Was his jab ever consistently landing on bradley? Bradley controlled the pace and had pac stopping in the middle of the ring waiting for bradley to just brawl cause thats the only way manny could win!

Pacquiao always comes forward, that's a dominant trait. Pacquiao rarely pins anyone to the ropes (but did get Bradley into the corner). I still fail to see how getting someone in a corner/against the ropes proves something regarding effective aggression or ring generalship (Mayweather gets driven to corners all the time). I also fail to see how Bradley could control any pace when tactically retreating from Pacquiao (who, as you said, always comes forward). Pac tee'd off on Bradley while Bradley tried to dodge with head movement (unsuccessfully).

And naturally, the only way Manny could win was to chase Bradley around the ring and land shots (because Bradley no longer wished to engage toe-to-toe like he initially promised). Pac was the aggressor.

[FUC_U_PAYME]

It doesn't matter what it is, it will improve boxing.

no because comubox is not a good way score a fight and the are robbies in the amatures/olympics

[TheSurgeonMDMPH]

I think foreman needs to stfu! Legend or not. He clearly is out of touch.

[CHOWWOKKA]

First Pacquiao loses to a 38 year old lightweight and now he loses to a 1 legged light welterweight...

[The Hammer]

Cause this fool said he scored Pacquiao vs Bradley for Bradley. I should have stopped watching his vids a long time ago, but somehow its pure comedy how he tries to defend his wrong predictions after the fight happened. He picked Bradley to win the fight before it took place and afterwards he made 2 or 3 vids in which he explained an hour long why he thought Bradley won.(I only watched 2 of the vids and I only finished one).

He even said Bradley would win the rematch much clearer. The fact that the whole Mayweather family and Bradley himself basically admit (directly or indirectly) that Pacquiao won the fight, doesnt matter to Dwyer.

Dwyer is just an idiot. Don't take him seriously.

[Pacquiao'd]

LOL @ the OP and this lame thread. sandy vag much?

[RL_GMA]

He's biased as **** though against Pacquiao and for Mayweather. Even when he picked Bute over Froch and was totally wrong, he still tried to justify Bute's loss to give him credit. Just another guy who makes videos.