Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Dr Z View Post



    Yes, let's be honest.


    Between 1997 and 2005, Floyd served eight jail terms on various charges, including drug possession, theft, and trespass​.

    He was arrested on drug charges. He was addicted to opioids. He pled guilty to an armed robbery for which he spent years in prison.

    Those are the facts. Anyone want to disagree with them?

    He did not deserve to die. AND YES, the cop deserved to go to prison by applying what he did for 10 minutes because of his death, and only because of his death. He could have arrested him differently. Taser him? Let us not pretend that if Floyd was fine after the arrest this is not an issue as it is/was.

    BUT, he is no longer a problem to society. He was a x college football player, and a thief amd a robber among other things.

    Travesty and Bigg Dunn are defending him. Let this case rest. Floyd is no poster boy / innocent man. And he doesn't deserve a statue. Someone ought to put a stone down ( bolted ) with his arrest record next to his statue. Otherwise people will think he is some civil right activist or a saint.​
    ive seen people describe him in the same breath as Martin Luther King lol, people have been brainwashed into thinking he was some hero

    Comment


      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

      You missed the point again.

      OJ was the criminal on trial. So yeah it’s the OJ case. Aubrey, Floyd and King were victims. Yet you say their case as if they were on trial. Chauvin, white cops, and the two racists were on trial.

      That illustrates your issues with race. You treat black victims as if they are on trial.

      Please dude read carefully.
      you really trying to change the argument at hand to this? LOL..

      Comment


        Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

        In many cases, like Floyd, they violated his constitutional rights before that thus he isn’t obliged to follow those instructions.

        Dont you know this?

        Yeah you better run after that ether I gave you about Aubrey and your racial issues.
        LOL.. getting second hand embarrassment from you.. happy monday.

        Comment


          Originally posted by travestyny View Post

          Yep, I did get you. And you're still stu-pid enough to think a neck is made to withstand 140lbs. Racists are just made dumb.

          But you last argument just fell. Thanks for playing
          Theres probably a logical reason you're here and not out there practicing law

          Society doesn't need another Al Dullton.

          Comment


            Some necks are like CONvid victims.....too frail to survive what 98.3% of everyone else does

            Comment


              Originally posted by travestyny View Post


              The trainer was asked in the video specifically: How would a trained neck restraint work?

              He said it's an MMA choke where you apply pressure to one side of the neck with your inner thigh, and pressure on the other side is applied by the person's arm.

              Is that what Chauvin did or not?

              And you would agree that he said the neck restraint done with legs is NOT taught, right? So Charlie Kirk was lying, right?

              When asked specifically about if what Chauvin did was an MPD trained neck restraint, the trainer replied, "No sir."
              When asked if it has ever been, he replies, " A neck restraint? No sir."

              He claimed the only time something like that is allowed to happen is when someone is actively aggressive, and even then it's regulated. The definition for active aggression is this:



              Was Floyd performing an assault while he was laid prone and handcuffed? Most of all, when George Floyd passed out, he couldn't possibly be actively aggressive, correct? That means Chauvin definitely should not have been in that position on Floyd after he passed out, correct?
              Chauvin’s mom is in possession of her son’s “Use of Force and Force Applications” training manuals and the MRT is in there. With a picture of a policeman kneeling with both knees on a subject. Chauvin from prison said it was in their written policy manual in section 5-316. There was a police department PowerPoint presentation used for training that had another picture of MRT with knees being used to restrain…but the judge didn’t allow it to be shown at trial. So the police chief and the trainer have been accused of outright lying under oath about MRT not being part of the training.

              Floyd was resisting officer commands from the start. Even the black female he was with told him several times to stop resisting. Then he wouldn’t go in the backseat of the police vehicle, and asked to be put on the ground instead. Once on the ground he continued to not do what the officers were telling him and he also kicked at them. I think that qualifies as active aggression.
              Last edited by ShoulderRoll; Yesterday, 11:34 AM.

              Comment


                Originally posted by TheProudLunatic View Post
                Some necks are like CONvid victims.....too frail to survive what 98.3% of everyone else does
                Police body cam video shows Chauvin’s knee was on Floyd’s shoulder at times, not even on the neck.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                  Police body cam video shows Chauvin’s knee was on Floyd’s shoulder at times, not even on the neck.
                  And not looking as if any extra "excessiveness" is being used to compensate the massive size difference.

                  98.3% would agree

                  Comment


                    Officer Tou Thao, Chauvin’s partner, speaks from prison.

                    Chief Arradondo and Katie Blackwell ”Lied the entire time” about MRT. “Probably to cover themself.”






                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Hector Enrique View Post

                      whats your question? i've answered them all
                      No you didn't. I asked you to confirm whether 11ng/ml of fentanyl is necessarily fatal and you ducked it when I posted that people with 5 times that amount were pulled over for DUI's and lived.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP