Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do people rate Canelo's resume so high, even relative to GGG's?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by SweetPbfAli View Post
    Is this a serious thread? Canelo has the strongest resume in boxing outside of Manny. I don't even see much room to argue otherwise.




    this guy is an idiot

    Comment


      Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
      Fun fact GGG has faced just 5 opponents that have ever been world champ his ENTIRE career. Meanwhile Canelo has already beaten 15 world champs. GGG is older then Canelo and today with so many belts out there it has never been easier to become a world champ in the history of boxing. That's a huge indictment on the tomato can filled resume GGG has. Hell if you consistently stay as a top 15-30 ranked contender in your weight class long enough you can accidentally become world champ with all the belts that become vacant out there alone. The fact that GGG fought so many bums who have accomplished nothing in the sport before or after fighting him says volumes about his resume. You can count on 1 hand how many universally top 10 ranked middleweight he has fought most of these clowns he faced weren't even on RING, ESPN or 3rd party top 10 rankings. Canelo has fought damn near 20 universally top 10 ranked fighters.

      But dyck for brains GGG fans really want us to believe that the level of opponents are equal. Not even bringing up the fact that Canelo has won titles in 3 weight classes, beaten lineal champs, hall of famers, top 10 P4P ranked fighters, unified belts in 2 different weight classes but because you say wins over guys like Vanes and Stevens are GOOD Wins and comparable to wins over guys like Cotto, Trout, Jacobs, Lara, etc make it so? LMAO




      he managed to close the grand-canyon sized difference in their resumes..... by labeling Vanes as "good", and Mosley as "ok"

      Comment


        Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
        You lost creditability when you listed Rolls as a OK Win. Vanes a semi retired gate keeper at 154 coming off a loss and 2 years without fighting and you force him to fight for the first time ever at 160 is a terrible win. Rolls is even worst a journeyman almost as old as GGG with no punching power ranked the 81st best middleweight in the world having never even fought a top 50 ranked middleweight? Rolls had only one 10 round fight his entire career. He was basically a 35 year old 8 round fighter.

        You got to go back to when Canelo was a teenager to find a time he fought someone that wasn't even a top 50 ranked fighter. The levels in both guys resumes is so wide Canelo could get hit by a bus and never fight again and GGG could spend the next 3 years fighting nothing but world champs and universally top 10 ranked fighters and STILL not match Canelo's resume right now....and Canelo not even done he's not even 30 yet and still adding on...while GGG is fighting nobody with a pulse the Rolls of the world and Vanes in between begging for more rematches with Canelo. He isn't even trying to add to his legacy leaving his bytch fans to try and talk up a resume of fighting house arrest Wade, retired 154lb Vanes, 8 round 35 year old nobody Rolls, career gate keeper Rosado, Curtis Stevens who has lost to everybody and before he fought GGG was white washed by Jessie Brinkley and knocked out by a bum with 38 career losses Primera.





        these guys pump up Stevens and Monroe..... but guys like Cotto and Mosley were just old LMAO

        Comment


          Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
          I do rate GGG pretty high.....

          you have ploughed your nose WAAAAAY up his ass


          As for the other names... if he was going 12 rounds with Macklin and Monroe, and getting dropped by Lemieux and Stevens etc en route to getting a KO or going 12...I would agree that he is/was overrated...but running through about 15 of those guys by KO I just think is really impressive.

          I don't think Canelo would have gotten all of his guys out by KO and maybe would not have 'won' all of them..
          .


          you owe us that name

          who would have beaten Canelo... name him, you crack-head... ???

          Comment


            from the other thread.....


            The point is, who cares that... (Golovkin)... didn’t move up, he fought Jacobs and Canelo twice

            If Canelo wanted to defend his middleweight crown 20 times and not move up in weight, I wouldn’t care and no one else should.


            yea I don't care about the weight either

            Mr " anyone from 154-168 " can fight at 160 his whole career, no problem

            a lot of fighters campaigned in one division their whole career

            he was actually perfectly entitled to feast on scrubs his whole career as well

            it's just their talk that gets people riled

            forget Ward, I get whats up when it came to Ward..... but I thought that Golovkin would fight guys like Saunders, Andrade, Charlo, Lara, etc..... refusing to negotiate on weight with 153lb Cotto, but being more than happy to negotiate on weight with 160lb Rosado..... is utterly ridiculous

            ALL of those names he missed are a top 2 win on his resume

            ALL of those fights could have made, on multiple occasions

            some of those names, would be the best win on his resume now..... some of those other names, could still prove to be the best..... but are at least a top 2 win right now

            pretty disappointing that a guy who promised fans so much, ended his career with so few notable wins on his resume, and so many notable misses..... wtf?

            #timidselectionpolicy
            Last edited by aboutfkntime; 07-13-2019, 05:30 PM.

            Comment


              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              Golovkin will not even fight those guys.... he will avoid them to select an opponent who never had a " best day " LMAO
              There is no one on Canelo's resume that Golovkin can't beat. You know that as well as I do. So cut the wild exaggeration.

              Comment


                Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                There is no one on Canelo's resume that Golovkin can't beat. You know that as well as I do. So cut the wild exaggeration.
                Alvarez beat back to back 39 year olds (N'Dou and Baldomire ) before his epic title fight with Mattew Hatton.
                That must tie some kind of record.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                  There is no one on Canelo's resume that Golovkin can't beat...... So cut the wild exaggeration.


                  I never said that..... so cut the bullshlt

                  I said there are a pile of guys who Golovkin won't fight


                  yea I don't care about the weight either

                  Mr " anyone from 154-168 " can fight at 160 his whole career, no problem

                  a lot of fighters campaigned in one division their whole career

                  he was actually perfectly entitled to feast on scrubs his whole career as well

                  it's just their talk that gets people riled

                  forget Ward, I get whats up when it came to Ward..... but I thought that Golovkin would fight guys like Saunders, Andrade, Charlo, Lara, etc..... refusing to negotiate on weight with 153lb Cotto, but being more than happy to negotiate on weight with 160lb Rosado..... is utterly ridiculous

                  ALL of those names he missed are a top 2 win on his resume

                  ALL of those fights could have made, on multiple occasions

                  some of those names, would be the best win on his resume now..... some of those other names, could still prove to be the best..... but are at least a top 2 win right now

                  pretty disappointing that a guy who promised fans so much, ended his career with so few notable wins on his resume, and so many notable misses..... wtf?

                  #timidselectionpolicy

                  not sure if Golovkin could have beaten Cotto, who was knocking out the same fools that Golovkin was knocking out

                  I want to know why G avoided that fight

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                    I never said that..... so cut the bullshlt

                    I said there are a pile of guys who Golovkin won't fight





                    not sure if Golovkin could have beaten Cotto, who was knocking out the same fools that Golovkin was knocking out

                    I want to know why G avoided that fight
                    I'm not sure he could beat Floyd but I was referring to guys Canelo beat. Cotto never happened because they weren't in the same weight class. When Cotto and Canelo made their fight Golovkin stepped aside to let it proceed. The WBC wanted that fight because it was a natural between two popular Latino fighters. Mexico and Puerto Rico have had a long boxing rivalry so the fight was a natural. I won't get into what happened after but that's my understanding of how it played out.
                    Last edited by TonyGe; 07-13-2019, 08:56 PM.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                      I'm not sure he could beat Floyd but I was referring to guys Canelo beat. Cotto never happened because they weren't in the same weight class. When Cotto and Canelo made their fight Golovkin stepped aside to let it proceed. The WBC wanted that fight because it was a natural between two popular Latino fighters. Mexico and Puerto Rico have had a long boxing rivalry so the fight was a natural. I won't get into what happened after but that's my understanding of how it played out.
                      Your fantasy BS is irrelevant when comparing resumes. Golovkin's resume is pathetic compared to Canelo's.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP