Originally posted by Boxing1013
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do people rate Canelo's resume so high, even relative to GGG's?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Real King Kong View PostThis is why resumes don’t really matter until a fighter’s career is judged as a whole tbh...even then, who really cares. It can all be very subjective and it’s pretty well meaningless unless we’re talking about mythical p4p rankings. What really matters is the fights themselves...the best fighters facing each other as close to their primes as possible. That’s the only circumstance where who’s the best is settled...and even then it’s only on a given night. Boxing at the highest level is a sport of single fights over whole careers imo. Resumes invariably turn into never ending subjective arguments, cuz everyone can’t fight everyone and fighters peak at different times.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing1013 View PostSadly I think you're correct as far as people having a personal vested interest in their fighter or fighters doing well...or being perceived well...and also then denigrating other fighters to try and make their guys look better by comparison, while also slighting that fighter/his 'people'.
I personally don't think I have that problem...but I'm sure we all have our biases...I just try to look at stuff objectively and let the chips fall where they may...there have been great black white Mexican etc fighters...black fighters all-time probably have the highest percentage in my view...but the eastern euros are really doing well in this era and probably closing that gap some.
But yeah I guess my point is that it's not like there is a clear superiority there for any 'group'...or a real need for a great ____ hope...if someone really wants to pin their hopes on someone from their background, they honestly have a litany of fighters, past and present to choose from, to be proud of.
Yeah name wise...it is not really a debate...Mosley and Cotto are on Canelo's...and Lara too...GGG can't really compete there...if those were prime versions of Mosley and Cotto at or around their best weights...I would rate those wins as great wins.
That's the type of stuff an ATG would have...and honestly very rarely in this sport does a fighter have multiple great clear wins over another great fighter...especially if he doesn't have almost as many losses as well.
I do think Canelo beat Lara though so I give him full credit for that win...I love Lara but he pisses me off sometimes with how lackadaisical he can be at times...and that is why Canelo took it imo...he just raised his level while Lara didn't.
Some of those names on Canelos resume imo mean nothing because I think GGG would have best those guys as well. Take cotto for example. Cotto literally paid GGG step aside money so he could fight Canelo for the MW title at a catchweight of 155lbs. GGG should have just said no to get that name.
Then in two fights they were virtually even though I had GGG edgejng both fights 8-4 then 7-5. Even if you went by offical results nothing proves Canelo is far superior to GGG. Officially he beat GGG by 1 round. GGG even out landed Canelo in like 20/24 rounds. Then his fans complain about power punches and how Canelo landed so many BUT facts are still they did nothing to GGG.
Top that off with the fact Canelo is now cornered and desperate to do anything to avoid a 37 year old GGG again? Despite it being "easy"? Please.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Socialtwinkie View PostI thought at best Canelo drew with Lara. But a draw imo would have been fine but I think Canelo was gifted that too. Even he thought he lost that fight until it was announced.
Some of those names on Canelos resume imo mean nothing because I think GGG would have best those guys as well. Take cotto for example. Cotto literally paid GGG step aside money so he could fight Canelo for the MW title at a catchweight of 155lbs. GGG should have just said no to get that name.
Then in two fights they were virtually even though I had GGG edgejng both fights 8-4 then 7-5. Even if you went by offical results nothing proves Canelo is far superior to GGG. Officially he beat GGG by 1 round. GGG even out landed Canelo in like 20/24 rounds. Then his fans complain about power punches and how Canelo landed so many BUT facts are still they did nothing to GGG.
Top that off with the fact Canelo is now cornered and desperate to do anything to avoid a 37 year old GGG again? Despite it being "easy"? Please.
People not scoring all the good work GGG was doing in those fights is just odd imo...he was outworking Canelo in most every round...and some of them clearly...the other rounds were relatively close...just can't really see how anyone can get to 6 or 7 rounds for Canelo without twisting how they score fights.
Comment
-
Anyone who can put Golovkin and Canelo's resumes in the same sentence doesn't know much about boxing. Casuals are allowed to think that, tho, since they know very little about boxing.
War Boxing!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing1013 View PostCanelo's cut was bigger!!! GGG won!! lolLast edited by Thuglife Nelo; 07-13-2019, 02:03 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing1013 View PostThat dude is actually a good poster imo...he is one of the few people on here who keeps it pretty real based on what he sees, from I can tell...I've read quite a few of his posts and never really found anything that over the top or rude...your posts on the other hand
Nehequini got suspended I guess ;0 lol
I think however the LDBC are to blame for your cute actions. Though I never seen LDBC ride GGG like so...
How is the other Rene Box Young account going?
Comment
-
Dayam boxing1013 life mission is to defend ggg tomato can resume. He asks the question to troll everyone... It's like arguing someone why his god exists but my God doesn't. Emotions
Comment
-
the part that must always be remembered when comparing their resumes...is canelo is like 29...and lil g is like 37...
now canelo might end up retiring young since he will be so well off financially....but he still has plenty of time to do great things and add to his...which is already very good
lil g is 37 and basically fighting bums until someone forces canelo to fight him again...lil g has 3 good names on his and hes 1-1-1 with all fights being pretty close for the most part...he was supposed to be a killer that was going to end canelo "as we know him".....LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing1013 View PostGood points man...it is always about the opinions...I honestly just love boxing...so I get on here every so often to see what the topics of the day are...and occasionally I will see some narratives gaining steam that I don't really personally see.
So just wanted to throw it out there in a way...to see what others thought on the specifics...I figured most posts would be combative and maybe a little rude but I thought (correctly imo) some people would come in and give some good perspectives.
But yeah...I guess we can all see what we want to see sometimes...I do rate GGG very high based on what I've seen from him...but I think there are some valid criticisms that can be leveled at him too...I think he could have done more vs Jacobs and certainly Canelo to really help his legacy.
He could have moved up at a certain point if he really wanted to focus on 'legacy' too...could argue staying at MW was a better legacy move too...never really hurt Hagler...but still it is a worthwhile question about him.
I think waiting on Canelo was the right move all around...but I do think he could have negotiated earlier with Canelo on weight too...not saying he should have because it all worked out...but yeah I think it is fair to have some criticisms of him or anyone else.
Just to me a lot of the stuff leveled at him is kind of head-scratching stuff lol...like I'll read an article or two and will see the same lines parroted by different posters etc lol...Idk it's just weird to me I guess...I guess we all see things differently sometimes.
I just get tired of the comments from the haters and the guys too ****** to pour piss out of a boot with instructions on the heel. :-)
Comment
Comment