Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Broner: Everybody Knows I Beat Pacquiao; I Controlled Fight!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    This is 6th grade science and has nothing do with objects moving in space. That is not the only anomaly about the "moon landings" but dust would not go up in the "air" in an airless environment when kicked up by the feet of walking astronauts or a moving wheel.

    Comment


      Sure, why not? Broner made Pacquiao miss 400+ punches, way more than Pac missed; so I guess you could argue, 'he had better defense'. Or his movement around the ring was exactly what he wanted to do, so maybe he was the 'ring general'.

      Obviously I wrote this tongue-in-cheek (sorry no sarcasm font), but it just goes to show you how the ambiguity in boxing scoring allow for judges to score in favor of whichever fighter they want (the A-Side), and it being somewhat justified by the rules.

      But as long as we hold on to this antiquated method, without it being fully articulated, then we always have the possibility for legitimized robberies.

      (Once again, reading comprehension, not writing Broner actually won, just using this as a soapbox)

      Comment


        Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
        Lololololol I’ll trade him for Amir Khan even. At least he goes out on his shield. Broner doesn’t let his hands go but feels letting him gums go after the fight will compensate
        Yeah we can all laugh at Khan but at least he tries

        Comment


          Originally posted by NEELZ View Post
          I would like to point something out about the moon landings. They WERE 100% faked. The earth is not flat, Broner did not win the fight. Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and holiday creations. But go to youtube and look at the videos on the faked moon landings videos. There are plenty of verifiable scientists who look at the videos of the lunar rover and the landings on the moon and can see quite clearly that those videos are not of the moon.

          There are lots of things to say about the moon landings but this should be apparent. The moon is an airless, vacuum. No atmosphere. When the moon rover is riding around kicking up dust in the "air", that would be impossible in an airless, vacuum. In an airless vacuum all the material stays stuck to the surface. Lots of other things to say, but the technology in '68 had no hope of landing a man safely on the moon.


          Todays technology which should be much more advanced, makes no effort to land on the moon because of the Van Allen belt and other obstacles.


          lmao, your dumb ass doesnt realize china just landed on the moon in like the last year.

          Comment


            Broner reminds me of that stripper giving me a lap dance when I was younger that told me she was a high school teacher by day. They are both full of sh@t...

            Comment


              I can see how a fighter can think he's doing well in the moment, but there was no excuse for Kevin Cunningham lying to him in the corner saying he was winning all those rounds. He set it up so that Broner would be surprised and do another dumbass post-fight interview.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
                Wow and Christ.


                This forum suffers from cognitive dissonance in masses.


                Broner thought Broner was winning because it was a close fight. Pac is not as good as you claim, Adrien is not as bad as you claim, and this fight was far from one sided.

                Only reason folks bury Adrien the way they do is because he got under their skin. Like he wasn't trying to or some ****. As if this isn't the desired effect.
                Your joking right? Broner was outworked for almost the whole fight and in 2 rounds literally was on ***** street running for his life.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by NEELZ View Post
                  This is 6th grade science and has nothing do with objects moving in space. That is not the only anomaly about the "moon landings" but dust would not go up in the "air" in an airless environment when kicked up by the feet of walking astronauts or a moving wheel.
                  If force is applied to a tiny object like a speck of dust, it will move in the direction of the force applied. The dust moved up and away from the rear of the rover because of the force applied to it by the rotation of the wheels, then it began to come back down to the moon's surface as gravity overcame the force applied by the wheels.

                  There is no need for "air" to explain how and why that happened. 6th grade science is all you need

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
                    Arbitrary semantics you've been trained to believe are more than false equivalencies.

                    You can win every round of a close fight bubba.


                    As far as condescension goes; who here has my track record? I am the man who posted all the champions from 686 BC to now. I am the man who posted all the authorities who ever rules over boxing. Want an understanding of physics? Yeah, I do that too.

                    I don't know **** about boxing? Me? You sure? I am condescending? You sure I'm not the one expert willing to deal with you idiots? You only understand one language and it ain't professionalism is it bubba?

                    How many historians outside of myself are here?

                    How many physicists outside of myself are speaking to you?

                    Boxing Historians, Kinesiologists ( Means the study of the physics of the human body, IE I am specialist above a general physicist ) they come to teach the fans what the fans missed right? No? Why? Maybe because you ****heads be ****heads and they run and cry like intellectuals like to do. Maybe I'm just the rare professional with enough prick in him to clap back at your goofy asses....no offense.

                    Maybe you've been indoctrinated to speak like a prick until out pricked by a bigger prick? Maybe that's why experts do not give a **** about fans?
                    Listen, I could not care less about what you posted in the past; what manufactured background you claim to be from; or for any man that repeatedly refers to others as “bubba” and then rambles on about the size of “pricks”.

                    You can write up all the history lessons you wish, YOU and your fake background cannot COMPREHEND what you are watching in the ring. If your background is legit, you should be ashamed of yourself for wasting your life on a sport you clearly will never grasp. It was a close fight though right? Boxingfan91 already put you in your place. Go write up a story about ancient pugilists from the navy that will have this place buzzing zzzzz... Thanks.

                    Comment


                      AB lost and it wasn't even close.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP