This is 6th grade science and has nothing do with objects moving in space. That is not the only anomaly about the "moon landings" but dust would not go up in the "air" in an airless environment when kicked up by the feet of walking astronauts or a moving wheel.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Broner: Everybody Knows I Beat Pacquiao; I Controlled Fight!
Collapse
-
Sure, why not? Broner made Pacquiao miss 400+ punches, way more than Pac missed; so I guess you could argue, 'he had better defense'. Or his movement around the ring was exactly what he wanted to do, so maybe he was the 'ring general'.
Obviously I wrote this tongue-in-cheek (sorry no sarcasm font), but it just goes to show you how the ambiguity in boxing scoring allow for judges to score in favor of whichever fighter they want (the A-Side), and it being somewhat justified by the rules.
But as long as we hold on to this antiquated method, without it being fully articulated, then we always have the possibility for legitimized robberies.
(Once again, reading comprehension, not writing Broner actually won, just using this as a soapbox)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by NEELZ View PostI would like to point something out about the moon landings. They WERE 100% faked. The earth is not flat, Broner did not win the fight. Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and holiday creations. But go to youtube and look at the videos on the faked moon landings videos. There are plenty of verifiable scientists who look at the videos of the lunar rover and the landings on the moon and can see quite clearly that those videos are not of the moon.
There are lots of things to say about the moon landings but this should be apparent. The moon is an airless, vacuum. No atmosphere. When the moon rover is riding around kicking up dust in the "air", that would be impossible in an airless, vacuum. In an airless vacuum all the material stays stuck to the surface. Lots of other things to say, but the technology in '68 had no hope of landing a man safely on the moon.
Todays technology which should be much more advanced, makes no effort to land on the moon because of the Van Allen belt and other obstacles.
lmao, your dumb ass doesnt realize china just landed on the moon in like the last year.
Comment
-
I can see how a fighter can think he's doing well in the moment, but there was no excuse for Kevin Cunningham lying to him in the corner saying he was winning all those rounds. He set it up so that Broner would be surprised and do another dumbass post-fight interview.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View PostWow and Christ.
This forum suffers from cognitive dissonance in masses.
Broner thought Broner was winning because it was a close fight. Pac is not as good as you claim, Adrien is not as bad as you claim, and this fight was far from one sided.
Only reason folks bury Adrien the way they do is because he got under their skin. Like he wasn't trying to or some ****. As if this isn't the desired effect.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NEELZ View PostThis is 6th grade science and has nothing do with objects moving in space. That is not the only anomaly about the "moon landings" but dust would not go up in the "air" in an airless environment when kicked up by the feet of walking astronauts or a moving wheel.
There is no need for "air" to explain how and why that happened. 6th grade science is all you need
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View PostArbitrary semantics you've been trained to believe are more than false equivalencies.
You can win every round of a close fight bubba.
As far as condescension goes; who here has my track record? I am the man who posted all the champions from 686 BC to now. I am the man who posted all the authorities who ever rules over boxing. Want an understanding of physics? Yeah, I do that too.
I don't know **** about boxing? Me? You sure? I am condescending? You sure I'm not the one expert willing to deal with you idiots? You only understand one language and it ain't professionalism is it bubba?
How many historians outside of myself are here?
How many physicists outside of myself are speaking to you?
Boxing Historians, Kinesiologists ( Means the study of the physics of the human body, IE I am specialist above a general physicist ) they come to teach the fans what the fans missed right? No? Why? Maybe because you ****heads be ****heads and they run and cry like intellectuals like to do. Maybe I'm just the rare professional with enough prick in him to clap back at your goofy asses....no offense.
Maybe you've been indoctrinated to speak like a prick until out pricked by a bigger prick? Maybe that's why experts do not give a **** about fans?
You can write up all the history lessons you wish, YOU and your fake background cannot COMPREHEND what you are watching in the ring. If your background is legit, you should be ashamed of yourself for wasting your life on a sport you clearly will never grasp. It was a close fight though right? Boxingfan91 already put you in your place. Go write up a story about ancient pugilists from the navy that will have this place buzzing zzzzz... Thanks.
Comment
Comment