Broner needs help guys.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Broner: Everybody Knows I Beat Pacquiao; I Controlled Fight!
Collapse
-
Adrien "I won that round, right?" Broner
[img]//media.*****.com/media/1fdYdesJFRPMjS9ANC/*****.gif[/img]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View PostArbitrary semantics you've been trained to believe are more than false equivalencies.
You can win every round of a close fight bubba.
As far as condescension goes; who here has my track record? I am the man who posted all the champions from 686 BC to now. I am the man who posted all the authorities who ever rules over boxing. Want an understanding of physics? Yeah, I do that too.
I don't know **** about boxing? Me? You sure? I am condescending? You sure I'm not the one expert willing to deal with you idiots? You only understand one language and it ain't professionalism is it bubba?
How many historians outside of myself are here?
How many physicists outside of myself are speaking to you?
Boxing Historians, Kinesiologists ( Means the study of the physics of the human body, IE I am specialist above a general physicist ) they come to teach the fans what the fans missed right? No? Why? Maybe because you ****heads be ****heads and they run and cry like intellectuals like to do. Maybe I'm just the rare professional with enough prick in him to clap back at your goofy asses....no offense.
Maybe you've been indoctrinated to speak like a prick until out pricked by a bigger prick? Maybe that's why experts do not give a **** about fans?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThat's true. And you can also have fights which are close but clear draws. Eg, if each fighter clearly wins 6 close rounds of a 12 round fight.
But, imo, there is no case to be made for Broner winning any more than 3 rounds, maximum, of that fight last night, and 2 of the judges gave him 4 rounds.
That's what people are complaining about.
Boxing has always had flexible rules that allow corruption. That's why everyone's always crying about corruption but nothing ever gets done about corruption.
If you look at Broughton's Rules for the first rules on purse splits you'll read a nice little addendum that was exploited for a good 100+ years before being somewhat brought to heel by the Pugilistic Club.
A rules system based on exceptions. You're meant to do this most times but sometimes this is not the answer. Most fights the ref will call low blows, but, if the ref is not calling low blows punch them nuts son before the other fellas gets yours....that is boxing.
So unless the corruption is really ridiculous, as in Pac knocks Broner from pillar to post with multiple KDs and **** and it still goes to AB, then you can *****, but this crying over every score card that does match the consensus of a fanbase that has yet to learn its own history, science, or authorities is really getting out of hand.
Not a single high profile fight goes on anymore without a whole ****load of people crying about judges like those folks did nothing to be that person in that seat and we are the real experts.
I ain't saying the judges are perfect or beyond reproach, but, y'all're crying because the fella you reckon'd won by UD won by UD it just isn't as wide a UD as you all thought?
C'mon....that's not a culture youse really want to endorse. Boxing should not be overtaken by majority rules and popularity contests to such an extent that we can't even allow minor disagreement between the know-nothing fans and know-it-all judges.
I did my best, someone ought to make a case for Broner and I ain't really a fan of him or Pac so this is what y'all get.
Broner is not worth crying over
Comment
-
-
Comment