Is the "GGG" a major draw in the UK (using Brook's name) the biggest stretch?

[Vasyl’s dad]

What were GGG's numbers before that fight? Was GGG on PPV in the UK before?

Don't deflect. Just answer. If Brook did carry this ppv, his numbers before should be quite similar. So what were they?

[Wolfie*]

Don't deflect. Just answer. If Brook did carry this ppv, his numbers before should be quite similar. So what were they?

Not deflecting because we can go back and forth with this. Brook was the headline fighter and there is no denying that. They were booing GGG for godsakes at that fight.

[Robbie Barrett]

I'm not not like you, I don't come here with an agenda to discredit and **** on any boxer. But you are the one telling lies here.

Before he fought GGG, Kel Brook was a highly respected fighter with UK hard core boxing fans, but he was NOT a Sky PPV star.

Kel was paid £400k for fighting Gavin .. thats a 10th what he got for the Golovkin match, and the show, with Anthony Joshua on the bill, had a buy rate of 139k, compared to 500k+ when Kel fought GGG.

You said Brook never headlined a PPV before Golovkin, i proved you a wrong and i'm the liar? How does that work?

[kafkod]

You said Brook never headlined a PPV before Golovkin, i proved you a wrong and i'm the liar? How does that work?

Check the viewing figures for Brook's PPV appearence vs Gavin. 139k, and he shared that bill with AJ.

Numbers don't lie, only sad trolls like you.

[Robbie Barrett]

Check the viewing figures for Brook's PPV appearence vs Gavin. 139k, and he shared that bill with AJ.

Numbers don't lie, only sad trolls like you.

You're the liar, you said Brook never headlined a PPV, you lied. Joshua was on the undercard and wasn't the draw he is now, obviously.

I don't know how me proving you a liar makes me one.

[Humean]

You're the liar, you said Brook never headlined a PPV, you lied. Joshua was on the undercard and wasn't the draw he is now, obviously.

I don't know how me proving you a liar makes me one.

Brook-Gavin was technically the PPV that night but it was Joshua and the overall card that drove the PPV numbers as Brook-Gavin would never have been a stand-alone PPV in a million years.

[Robbie Barrett]

Brook-Gavin was technically the PPV that night but it was Joshua and the overall card that drove the PPV numbers as Brook-Gavin would never have been a stand-alone PPV in a million years.

He said Brook never headlined a PPV, he did. kafkod lied, i've caught him loads of times just making stuff like this up, that's what he does.

[Humean]

He said Brook never headlined a PPV, he did. kafkod lied, i've caught him loads of times just making stuff like this up, that's what he does.

I don't know him, maybe he did lie or maybe he forgot that Brook-Gavin was the headliner on that PPV as it is easy to forget. It was the first Sky Sports PPV I can remember that wasn't marketed upon the main event.

[Wolfie*]

Let me know how much Canelo vs GGG or GGG vs Jacobs PPV is in the UK since GGG is such a big draw there.

[Humean]

Let me know how much Canelo vs GGG or GGG vs Jacobs PPV is in the UK since GGG is such a big draw there.

The fact that Brook-Golovkin could do such good PPV numbers does indicate Golovkin's pull. Brook had to piggy-back upon Joshua and two other world title fights to 'headline' his previous PPV and Brook was essentially going to be paid off Fury's PPV should the Brook-Chaves have happened. Brook is a genuine PPV fighter only when fighting a few other opponents, one of which is Golovkin. Similar story for Eubank who should have been the one fighting Golovkin.