Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should boxers who test positive for illegal drugs be allowed into IBHOF?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
    Blah, blah, blah. Conspiracy theories.

    Mayweather didn't break any rules, he got a TUE. That's all that matters.
    Like I thought, you cannot handle it ...... you go girl!

    [IMG]//media.*****.com/media/gqSdIQ4cF4BqM/*****.gif[/IMG]

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
      Like I thought, you cannot handle it ...... you go girl!

      [IMG]//media.*****.com/media/gqSdIQ4cF4BqM/*****.gif[/IMG]
      Did Mayweather break the rules? Nope

      CASE CLOSED.

      Opinions and conspiracy theories don't mean shit, you need proof to back it up. You have none. It's just line and lines of nonsense that you type. I can't even be bothered reading it most of the time.
      Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 08-25-2016, 01:44 AM.

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
        What? Its a C/P straight out of WADA!!!
        YOU said Floyd pays off USADA. Where's your proof?

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
          No they aren't NSAC allows IV rehydration. Go ask the MMA fighters who openly admitted doing it until USADA took over UFC testing.

          and go ask Floyd. He admitted to using an IV to rehydrate AFTER USADA took over!

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            and go ask Floyd. He admitted to using an IV to rehydrate AFTER USADA took over!
            And got a TUE which means he didn't break the rules.

            This is boring........

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by SemiGreat View Post
              we never know until after the tests. why is that ?

              no p''e''d will make a guy a better fighter.
              They won't make a guy a "better" fighter. Just a stronger fighter, a faster fighter, a fighter with better O2 intake, a quicker healing fighter, a higher stamina fighter.

              I find it strange that sports figures in other sports, Lance Armstrong, Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Lyle Alzado, etc have all noticeably benefitted from steroid use, yet somehow you don't think it would translate into more success in boxing.

              Have you ever taken any steroids?

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post
                YOU said Floyd pays off USADA. Where's your proof?
                Floyd's representatives pays off USADA and Floyd got USADA recognized and into the door as far as boxing is concerned. USADA returned the favor.

                When Lance Armstrong's representatives paid off the UIC for testing purposes, USADA called that "unethical". The amount reported by Lance is NOTHING compared to what Floyd's reps paid USADA in the long run.


                USADA: They threw Manny under the bus when he did not report his medical condition knowing full well that Floyd did NOT let the NSAC know about his medical condition until 3 weeks after the fight. Furthermore, USADA went out of its way to defend Floyd. It helps when you pay them!

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
                  And got a TUE which means he didn't break the rules.

                  This is boring........

                  So what. So did Lance Armstrong. Lance even got a doctor to help him out too but when its wrong its wrong.



                  You want to get excited.
                  Let me know why Floyd, who admits to making weight for a decade EASILY, needed an IV?


                  Do you believe its like Floyd said because he gave urine?
                  Do you believe its like Floyd said because he gave less than 1 tbsp. of blood 10 days before?

                  Its a lie .....

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
                    And got a TUE which means he didn't break the rules.

                    This is boring........
                    By definition of the term exemption, means he broke the rules. He was given a pass and told that rule did not apply to him, that he was exempt from that rule. You know, that rule you posted a bunch of NSAC info and tried to say didn't exist.

                    It's like a church in the US. The church is tax exempt. That doesnt mean the tax doesn't exist, just that it doesnt apply to that church

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                      By definition of the term exemption, means he broke the rules. He was given a pass and told that rule did not apply to him, that he was exempt from that rule. You know, that rule you posted a bunch of NSAC info and tried to say didn't exist.

                      It's like a church in the US. The church is tax exempt. That doesnt mean the tax doesn't exist, just that it doesnt apply to that church
                      If the rule doesn't apply you can't break it.

                      It doesn't exist under NSAC rules. Which technically is all that matters when fighting in Nevada. USADA testing was voluntary.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP