Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Duran: Mayweather Not TBE, I Would Have Beaten Him
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Postain't no one trying to take anything from floyd, emo.
wasn't even talking about floyd. defensive like a chick.
Making sure to include an insult in every reply (with no counter argument), but I'm the defensive one acting like a chick
Thanks for the waste of time.Last edited by doom_specialist; 10-24-2015, 07:08 AM.
Comment
-
The best Duran beats Floyd.
The out of shape, unfocused, past his prime loses to Floyd, and thats only one Floyd would fight.
So if could be made a reality, in anyway, Floyd would win
Comment
-
The peak Duran would beat Floyd.
But it isn't too late for Floyd to make me change my mind. Fight GGG at middleweight and if GGG cant knock you out, even if GGG wins, I would go for you to win a points decision against Duran.
Moral of the story. Fight GGG already Floyd at 160. That is important because Floyd never took risks throughout his career, so just do it once. Duran did with more kos than Floyd has fights.Last edited by hugh grant; 10-24-2015, 07:40 AM.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Steve plunger View PostBenitez was elusive as a guy as mayweather and hearns dropped and beat him by decision
Originally posted by Steve plunger View Post...Duran was a master at defence and not easy to hit
Originally posted by Steve plunger View Post....Castillo was a lightweight and your comparing a Paul Williams to a Thomas hearns lol
Compared to Floyd Hearns would be massive (so everyone says), and my point is that Floyd has fought (and beat) larger fighters plenty.
Originally posted by Steve plunger View Posthere you have 130lb natural fighter in mayweather vs 147 lb pound fighter with the reach of a heavyweight
EARLY Hearns gets smoked by early Mayweather just like EARLY Hearns got smoked by Hagler. Same basic result, Floyd in and gone, Hearns KO'd.
LATE Floyd (2007+) would get smoked by EARLY Hearns.
You can't do straight up comparisons because they changed styles. EARLY Hearns was sloppy and had piss poor defense. Leonard was tagging him all night long, Hagler picked him apart. When Hearns came back larger he wasn't wild anymore, he was precise and accurate, dangerous. That's the Hearns that would give Floyd problems. Duran had the same problem, wild, taking risks early, got more precise and studied later on. That Duran would give Floyd problems.
People couldn't beat Floyd because they couldn't out box him. Wild fighters failed to do so (Cotto, Ortiz, Maidana, supposed to be Pacquiao). Why do you think Floyd drained Canelo and Marquez? A fresh Marquez would have given Floyd problems, a calm Tim Bradley gives Floyd problems. Terence Crawford would give Floyd problems. Lara would give Floyd problems. Not saying any of them would have won, but they would have given Floyd problems. Thus why the fights never would have happened.
Originally posted by Steve plunger View Postyou think slow maidana caught mayweather
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Postcastillo wasn't lanky, you nitwit.
All I said was, Castillo was larger (physically in appearance) than his opponent (Floyd), and got beat. Twice.
De La Hoya was larger than his opponents (Floyd AND Manny) and got beat.
Regardless of anything else, Floyd beat a physically larger opponent and has done multiple times. Size means nothing if you have the skill.
Thus it's not a stretch to believe that Floyd could beat a physically larger Hearns - though Hearns' size is because he was lanky, not just because of height - and Hearns made significant mistakes as a younger fighter. His chin was suspect for years and he was off balance, just like Hamed, and we see what happened there.
THAT is what I said. Pay attention, people.Last edited by Combat Talk Radio; 10-24-2015, 03:42 PM.
Comment
-
Maybe , maybe not.
Any fighter can beat any other fighter on a good night. I don't know why people think that any fighter will always beat another fighter all the time. Do NHL, NBA, NFL teams always beat the same teams every time they play. The problem with boxing is that fighters are matched up so carefully and given advantages so that they drastically increase their odds of winning.
Comment
Comment