Comments Thread For: Cotto: I Have Nothing To Prove To Canelo or Golovkin

[Craveman]

Belts are worthless, and have been for a long time now.

Only casual fans need a roadmap to tell them who the best fighter is in each division.

You silly kid, tell me where the WBC rank Wladimir Klitschko at HW.....
..... and then tell me why I should take them, and you, seriously ?

BTW, you are two posts away from skulking out of here with your tail between your legs, just saying.....

Ive been there done that with casual fans like you.

You're missing the point. Cotto knows those belts are important if not why hasn't he dropped them? Tell me.

[aboutfkntime]

OK, a different tack.....

If Golovkin beat Cotto at 160.......

Who would be Golovkins best win ?

Who ?

I want a reply to this post, or I will cut-n-paste the b1tch eveywhere

[Craveman]

OK, a different tack.....

If Golovkin beat Cotto at 160.......

Who would be Golovkins best win ?

Who ?

I'd say Murray. I've been saying Cotto should vacate the belts or fight Golovkin.

[tokon]

Cotto should just try to take his payday against Floyd and ride off into the sunset with another couple millions.

He won't win more than 2 rounds but his fans won't be reluctant to call it a "competitive" one again.

Good option to have.

[Craveman]

These asshats are crying about meaningful fights, and attempting to use ABC belts as justification.

Hypekin is a supposed killer, with a shht resume'..... and yet these asshats are trying to insinuate that little-ol-Cotto is a meaningful scalp at 160, just because he holds a SDFKLJGHFDSGLK belt.

Still waiting for Caveman to tell me why the WBC dont rate Klitschko, and why I should rate him

Never said that. Like you, I think Cotto isn't great win. Just about setting the matters right because I like the idea of Golovkin unifying all the belts like a true champion because he is willing to fight anyone unlike Cotto.

[aboutfkntime]

I'd say Murray. I've been saying Cotto should vacate the belts or fight Golovkin.

So, you admit that Cotto is not a very meaningful win at 160 for a supposed killer, not even better than Murray, who is solid but no world-beater?

I agree entirely.

Now fcuk off !

[aboutfkntime]

never said that. Like you, i think cotto isn't great win. just about setting the matters right because i like the idea of golovkin unifying all the belts like a true champion because he is willing to fight anyone unlike cotto.

Then stop fkn crying about it !

[Craveman]

I am with you when it comes to these trinkets. I just like to see competitive fights. GGGs quest for a belt, as if beating an ex jr welter, is not what being the "middleweight champion" is all about.

The GGG crew is setting the bar low if all we ever here is how the little guy is terrified and will be destroyed easily by GGG. I would be depressed if beating on an aging/smaller opponent, was the highlight of my favorite fighter's career.

Not true. Lee is top rated and he has the WBO belt. Ndam and Lemieux are fighting each other for the IBF belt and whoever wins would a good opponent. It's only Cotto who's not good and holding WBC and The Ring belt. The problem is they're all ducking him.

[Craveman]

Then stop fkn crying about it !

You are. I'm just saying he should drop it because he ain't worth it or go and get battered.

[Craveman]

Just get that into your head.

Fight or vacate Cotto!