Official Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao Postfight aftermath discussion

[RED REP]

9 rounds to 3.

Competitive in places but a lot of clear Mayweather rounds. Only two clear Pacquiao rounds.

36 yo ATG vs 38 yo ATG relatively boring fight.

[Spoon23]

Floyd Mayweather Sr. was freaking out in Floyd in the corner! Saying he needed to "Jump on his *" his whole corner thought he was behind in the fight.

Mayweather loss because he was running more than he was fighting and plus Manny was the aggressor countering Mayweather a lot. Mayweather had to hold Manny push his head away because he getting whooped with combinations and counter punches from Manny. I never in my life seen Mayweather get countered so much he usually do all of the countering.

Manny beats froid, but what can poor manny do against judges,referees,nsac,usada commentators,and the whole vegas mafia.tnx to fraudster. He made the "scam of the century"

Nevada State Athletics Conspiracy defeated Manny not Floyd.

-THE END-

[Johnwoo8686]

Since you have the time to watch the fight on replay. Might as well watch a thorough point by point connected punch per round by both men. That shows Pac really won that night hehe

Enjoy! Pac won this dance. And that's just with one effective hand.

These a very cool trick that has existed in cinema for decades, its called EDITING. That video is highly edited and chiefly constructed to make idiots/boxing novices think something that didn't happen actually did happen. Ive seen that video and it is so biased, chopped up, and spliced together in a way to make it seem Manny did more than he really did.

[Spoon23]

These a very cool trick that has existed in cinema for decades, its called EDITING. That video is highly edited and chiefly constructed to make idiots/boxing novices think something that didn't happen actually did happen. Ive seen that video and it is so biased, chopped up, and spliced together in a way to make it seem Manny did more than he really did.

Nope.

Yeah it was edited, edited the boring hugging parts, the mauling, the pushing of the face, the running, the pulling, the tugging, but what was retained was all the punches connected by both parties which is all there in the video. You can even verify it with your own two eyes

Truth hurts homey. The one armed Pac out scored a healthy Floyd lol

Actually if Floyd was penalized with all that hugging and tugging and pushing. This fight would have been even more pronounced win for Pac lol

Enjoy!

[ADP02]

it wasn't a mistake, It was a lie.

They didn't do everything right-they didn't verify any injury.

Surgery after the fact in this case looks inappropriate, especially given the fact there have been 3 different reports of when the alleged injury occurred (a fact you like to ignore).

There is just as much evidence that the injury was not real, another fact you gloss over. How would a "witness" know the severity of an injury?

People believed Floyd most likely because their was corroborating evidence supporting an injury DURING THE FIGHT from the HBO announcers, Floyd and Floyd's corner all talking about the injury. Manny has none of this.

In addition, Floyd did not have an unnecessary medical condition performed on him by a Dr. previously. Manny had this.

Not only was that Dr. hired by his promoter, but there was no evidence that Manny actually needed medical treatment from his primary physician, who has not indicated he was aware of any injury at ANY time.

You and RR claim but never show any evidence. You even say there is evidence. Show me your evidence that there was no injury.


As for your comment "How would a witness know the severity of an injury". If the witness saw something, it can help assess how bad they felt it was but no, its not like visiting a professional doctor unless the witness is a doctor. The point is that it showed that there were witnesses that agreed with the fact that Manny was injured BEFORE the fight. Some witnesses were professional doctors and some were not. They gave their perspective on the injury.

Still, what made be laugh about your question is that in your next paragraph in your post, you talk differently about "witnesses" who "heard" Floyd say that he was injured. Funny stuff. Made my day! Thanks for the double standards!

Manny had surgery. So not sure why you think that his doctor is not aware.

[ADP02]

NSAC denied the medication because they had no proof of the injury. NSAC is not going to imply or deny an injury exists, they simply wanted proof/confirmation that it exists.

You ignorantly think that by simply filling a check-box, they'll get medication. No, there is a process. They will always want documentation and then speak with his physicians amongst other things. They will want to know when exactly the injury occurred. And if the documentation confirms everything, and the physicians also state he needs the medication, then they will make a decision. The situation was never going to favor them either way because NSAC should have known way before fight week that such an injury existed.

As NSAC already said, the entire situation is unacceptable.

Taking it out of context I see.

I already told you and posted what the commissions said and would have done. See below. Recognize that?
Still waiting for your evidence that Manny was not injured before the fight. Everyone is anxiously waiting. I'm patient. Take your time.

"Pacquiao and Top Rank did not address why he did not check off the box on his prefight medical form to disclose the injury. Aguilar said had he done that, the commission doctor would have monitored Pacquiao leading up to the fight and that he would have been allowed to receive the prefight anti-inflammatory shot"

[ADP02]

These a very cool trick that has existed in cinema for decades, its called EDITING. That video is highly edited and chiefly constructed to make idiots/boxing novices think something that didn't happen actually did happen. Ive seen that video and it is so biased, chopped up, and spliced together in a way to make it seem Manny did more than he really did.

I also analyzed round 3, for example. Before the analysis, all we heard was Floyd fans saying that it was a clear Floyd round to after analysis, it being a swing round that favored Manny.

Either it was that the judges didn't see the punches like we can after the fact or the fact that they are Vegas judges favoring their Vegas fighter Floyd.

[radioraheem]

Taking it out of context I see.

I already told you and posted what the commissions said and would have done. See below. Recognize that?
Still waiting for your evidence that Manny was not injured before the fight. Everyone is anxiously waiting. I'm patient. Take your time.

"Pacquiao and Top Rank did not address why he did not check off the box on his prefight medical form to disclose the injury. Aguilar said had he done that, the commission doctor would have monitored Pacquiao leading up to the fight and that he would have been allowed to receive the prefight anti-inflammatory shot"

The burden of proof was on Team Pacquiao/Top Rank to show NSAC before the fight, even weeks before the fight. NSAC never denied he had an injury, they only asked for proof/confirmation. Unfortunately, the proof was not provided.

Simply checking a box does not mean he'll get the medication. But it's the positive and proper procedure to follow in order to receive it. He still had to show documentation verifying the injury, and NSAC would still talk to his physicians. The funny thing is that if he had the documentation and/or his physicians said he needed it, he would have received it despite not checking the box.

[radioraheem]

You and RR claim but never show any evidence. You even say there is evidence. Show me your evidence that there was no injury.


As for your comment "How would a witness know the severity of an injury". If the witness saw something, it can help assess how bad they felt it was but no, its not like visiting a professional doctor unless the witness is a doctor. The point is that it showed that there were witnesses that agreed with the fact that Manny was injured BEFORE the fight. Some witnesses were professional doctors and some were not. They gave their perspective on the injury.

Still, what made be laugh about your question is that in your next paragraph in your post, you talk differently about "witnesses" who "heard" Floyd say that he was injured. Funny stuff. Made my day! Thanks for the double standards!

Manny had surgery. So not sure why you think that his doctor is not aware.

None of his physicians that NSAC interviewed said he was injured before the fight. They said he was healthy and not a health risk to fight. NSAC cannot knowingly and legally send a fighter that's genuinely injured into the ring.

[ADP02]

The burden of proof was on Team Pacquiao/Top Rank to show NSAC before the fight, even weeks before the fight. NSAC never denied he had an injury, they only asked for proof/confirmation. Unfortunately, the proof was not provided.

Simply checking a box does not mean he'll get the medication. But it's the positive and proper procedure to follow in order to receive it. He still had to show documentation verifying the injury, and NSAC would still talk to his physicians. The funny thing is that if he had the documentation and/or his physicians said he needed it, he would have received it despite not checking the box.

None of his physicians that NSAC interviewed said he was injured before the fight. They said he was healthy and not a health risk to fight. NSAC cannot knowingly and legally send a fighter that's genuinely injured into the ring.

Oh, so you are telling me that today there is a new article that came out that counters all media news that said the following (see below)? SO you are saying that this article says that Manny never had an injury before the fight? Show me this new link please? I can't wait to see this link.

"Manny Pacquiao could face disciplinary action from Nevada boxing officials for failing to disclose a shoulder injury before his fight with Floyd Mayweather Jr."