Official Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao Postfight aftermath discussion

[radioraheem]

Radioraheem will come back and still show us ....... no proof and no evidence of his statements.

While, as I stated, there are plenty who knew about the injury prior to the fight. Yet, he still thinks there was no injury.

Nice try to spin it, but no cigar. I do not have to show any proof. Team Pacquiao informed NSAC that he had an injury 90 mins before the fight (extremely late). Therefore, NSAC requested proof, but was provided with none. So they denied his request for medication. The end.

[ADP02]

Nice try to spin it, but no cigar. I do not have to show any proof. Team Pacquiao informed NSAC that he had an injury 90 mins before the fight (extremely late). Therefore, NSAC requested proof, but was provided with none. So they denied his request for medication. The end.

So all you needed to say is that you have no proof because if you did, you would have had that in post #1.

Now after all this going back and forth, you saying that you don't need to is quite silly. Especially since YOU said that what I presented to you was not enough. You wanted more proof. Too funny.

I have posted over and over again people saying that they were aware of Manny's injury BEFORE the fight. You have no proof to dispute that there never was an injury. I have much more than you since you have NOTHING!!! So yes, you need to show PROOF. Something, anything ...... but we both know that you have NOTHING!

[radioraheem]

So all you needed to say is that you have no proof because if you did, you would have had that in post #1.

Now after all this going back and forth, you saying that you don't need to is quite silly. Especially since YOU said that what I presented to you was not enough. You wanted more proof. Too funny.

I have posted over and over again people saying that they were aware of Manny's injury BEFORE the fight. You have no proof to dispute that there never was an injury. I have much more than you since you have NOTHING!!! So yes, you need to show PROOF. Something, anything ...... but we both know that you have NOTHING!

NSAC denied the medication because Team Pacquiao provided NO PROOF of the injury. It was up to them to provide official documentation confirming the injury. But they never provided it. So with your logic, NSAC is supposed to provide PROOF that Pacquiao did not have an injury, correct?



Oh this is fun.

[The Big Dunn]

Nice try ..... not really.

ElAttrache said that Pacquiao was able to get through the 12 rounds against Mayweather because he "modulated his approach. He moderated what he did with his right hand. His punch count was less than it has been. He did alter the way he fought to get through the fight with the injury. He is in pain."

ElAttrache is a well-known sports surgeon who has operated on Los Angeles Lakers guard Kobe Bryant, Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Zack Greinke and New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, as well as boxers such as former heavyweight champion Vitali Klitschko and former welterweight titlist Andre Berto.



Oh, so believing Floyd has no bearing? Funny stuff coming from a Floyd fan. You Floyd fans never asked to see MRIs, documents, doctor's interviews before. Why the change?

he modulated his approach because he kept getting hit with right hands. Floyd made him reduce his punch output, like he has all his opponents. of course I wouldn't expect a Dr. not involved in the sport to know that. I guess all of Floyd's opponents had a "shoulder injury that modulated their output".

who he operated on in the past has no bearing on if I think Manny is lying. I base Manny lying on his actions.

If he will lie to his wife Jinkee, he will lie to anyone.

In 2002, there was no NSB, so that is why there was no request for info. Floyd also had not lied like Manny had back then so his actions didn't require further verification.

[ADP02]

NSAC denied the medication because Team Pacquiao provided NO PROOF of the injury. It was up to them to provide official documentation confirming the injury. But they never provided it. So with your logic, NSAC is supposed to provide PROOF that Pacquiao did not have an injury, correct?



Oh this is fun.

Lots of fun ...... you still have no proof that there was no injury.

Commissions were aware of an injury. You own quotes say so. Thanks for providing my proof!

Due to when they knew about it, they couldn't assess if it required medication or not. That is obvious to EVERYONE except you and a few other Floyd fans. That's it! Everyone else knows that an injury occurred before the fight. That is why they had doctors with a prescription. That is what USADA approved of. Too bad you can't get it. So simple.

[Spoon23]

Lots of fun ...... you still have no proof that there was no injury.

Commissions were aware of an injury. You own quotes say so. Thanks for providing my proof!

Due to when they knew about it, they couldn't assess if it required medication or not. That is obvious to EVERYONE except you and a few other Floyd fans. That's it! Everyone else knows that an injury occurred before the fight. That is why they had doctors with a prescription. That is what USADA approved of. Too bad you can't get it. So simple.

Told you radioraheem is a dimwit radioactive zombie now haha

[ADP02]

he modulated his approach because he kept getting hit with right hands. Floyd made him reduce his punch output, like he has all his opponents. of course I wouldn't expect a Dr. not involved in the sport to know that. I guess all of Floyd's opponents had a "shoulder injury that modulated their output".

who he operated on in the past has no bearing on if I think Manny is lying. I base Manny lying on his actions.

If he will lie to his wife Jinkee, he will lie to anyone.

In 2002, there was no NSB, so that is why there was no request for info. Floyd also had not lied like Manny had back then so his actions didn't require further verification.

Manny has done some wrong as has others as have you and I but he has changed .... but of course, you will not say that because that counters your weird agenda.

The point of that quote that I provided to you was not the doctors expertise about boxing but to point out that Manny was in fact injured.

In 2002? Man, I can show you threads that were made just months ago that Floyd fans said that Floyd said he was injured so its a fact . No more proof was required. Some brought up the injury, some brought up that he required surgery and some both.

[ADP02]

Told you radioraheem is a dimwit radioactive zombie now haha

Too bad he is not the real radioraheem. If he were, he would have at least tried to get proof. Our radioraheem needs no proof but its funny that he keeps on asking us to provide lots of proof and when we do, its not acceptable. Even though they were witnesses and seen Manny injured.

[Spoon23]

Too bad he is not the real radioraheem. If he were, he would have at least tried to get proof. Our radioraheem needs no proof but its funny that he keeps on asking us to provide lots of proof and when we do, its not acceptable. Even though they were witnesses and seen Manny injured.

Yeah the real radioraheem is a real boxing analyst. This poser is more of a crackhead type so he definitely not the real deal lol

[radioraheem]

Lots of fun ...... you still have no proof that there was no injury.

Commissions were aware of an injury. You own quotes say so. Thanks for providing my proof!

Due to when they knew about it, they couldn't assess if it required medication or not. That is obvious to EVERYONE except you and a few other Floyd fans. That's it! Everyone else knows that an injury occurred before the fight. That is why they had doctors with a prescription. That is what USADA approved of. Too bad you can't get it. So simple.

Again, with your logic, NSAC needs proof that Pacquiao did not have an injury. The burden of proof was on Team Pacquiao, and Team Pacquaio did not provide the proof of an injury before the fight. As a result, NSAC denied the medication.

But according to your logic, NSAC should have provided proof that Pacquiao does not have an injury.

Official documentation showing and clearly stating an injury is proof. Witnesses is not concrete proof or confirmation, especially when there's a conflict of interest with the witnesses because they were recently employed by you.