Comments Thread For: Froch Says No Thanks To Andre Ward, Eyes Chavez Jr.

[hitking]

You keep babbling on about this but refuse to give examples. Seems you're just butthurt for the sake of being butthurt.

Floyd's ducking everybody. Everybody is ducking GGG. And Stevenson is ducking Kovalev, which you've already been ****d on earlier:3some:

[FLY TY]

The same f.uck ass clowns that get on here everyday b1tchin' about Floyd. And get on here b1tchin' about folks duckin' GGG. And who get on here b1tchin' about Stevenson chasing the money and telling Kovalev to kick rocks. And the same ones applauding Froch for blatantly ducking the best fighter in his division. Y'all are some f.uckin' clowns. And if I could, I would slap the **** outta y'all. And when you hit the ground I'd kick you in your f.uckin' heads till you stop moving.

This.....

[Hougigo]

Yea there's a clear #1 and #2.

Fighting again doesn't really clear up who's better because Froch doesn't look like he's improved in anyway to beat ward.

This is only a money fight.... and if it's only a money fight, Ward would have to go over to England to really maximize that for both guys. HBO doesn't have enough money to bring Froch hear and satisfy Ward...unless it's PPV.... and this fight is not PPV here between those 2

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Floyd's ducking everybody. Everybody is ducking GGG. And Stevenson is ducking Kovalev, which you've already been ****d on earlier:3some:

Stevenson took a lower paying fight against a lesser opponent than Kovalev. How is that the same as what Froch is doing? It's not. If Stevenson had fought Hopkins and not Forfarna, there'd be no issue from me.

I've never said everyone is ducking GGG. People on here actually think I'm a GGG "hater" because I say he hasn't fought anyone and that Sergio took the far more lucrative fight and is clearly not ducking him.

Mayweather and Pacquiao have conveniently avoided each other whilst making good money to fight lesser opponents for years. Both are to blame.

No double standards here. You clearly flip flop depending on the race of the fighters which is quite sad.

[hitking]

Yea there's a clear #1 and #2.

Fighting again doesn't really clear up who's better because Froch doesn't look like he's improved in anyway to beat ward.

This is only a money fight.... and if it's only a money fight, Ward would have to go over to England to really maximize that for both guys. HBO doesn't have enough money to bring Froch hear and satisfy Ward...unless it's PPV.... and this fight is not PPV here between those 2

I don't really "disagree" with any of that. My entire point has been that Froch and his fans love to boast about what a warrior he is. And IMO a true warrior would be wanting to avenge his loss to Ward more than anything else. And my only other beef is the double standards on this site when it comes to a subject like this. There's very little consistency. Everything is based on who these clowns like and dislike, even when forming opinions on similar subjects.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I don't really "disagree" with any of that. My entire point has been that Froch and his fans love to boast about what a warrior he is. And IMO a true warrior would be wanting to avenge his loss to Ward more than anything else. And my only other beef is the double standards on this site when it comes to a subject like this. There's very little consistency. Everything is based on who these clowns like and dislike, even when forming opinions on similar subjects.

"To get the Ward loss off my record before I retire would be the best thing to do" - Carl Froch when interviewed TODAY on Skysports.

[White_Knight]

I don't really "disagree" with any of that. My entire point has been that Froch and his fans love to boast about what a warrior he is. And IMO a true warrior would be wanting to avenge his loss to Ward more than anything else. And my only other beef is the double standards on this site when it comes to a subject like this. There's very little consistency. Everything is based on who these clowns like and dislike, even when forming opinions on similar subjects.

Wrong. Froch fought Ward. Floyd never fought Margarito, Williams, Pacquiao, and Martinez (at 150). Floyd probably won't fight Lara if he wins either. Froch didn't take a 2-year holiday to avoid a tough division. Froch didn't say "he can have the belt". Froch didn't sign up with a different promoter to avoid a fighter.

The situations are completely different.

[Hougigo]

I don't really "disagree" with any of that. My entire point has been that Froch and his fans love to boast about what a warrior he is. And IMO a true warrior would be wanting to avenge his loss to Ward more than anything else. And my only other beef is the double standards on this site when it comes to a subject like this. There's very little consistency. Everything is based on who these clowns like and dislike, even when forming opinions on similar subjects.

If Ward says he'll go over there and Froch still said no then I'll jump on. That'd be his best chance at avenging his loss and getting paid. Not a Wembley fight, but he could get a crowd in Nottingham

[mathed]

Its funny. Cause Ward already beat Froch but guess who needs who? Froch about to get that big paper in Vegas on PPV. Something Ward always wanted. But guess what? Ward about to be sitting at home watching the fight feeling real bitter.

I remember the days (not long ago) when posters would call me a blind hater for saying Ward was spoiled and pampered. I'm just glad that more people are coming around to see his more dominant traits. The guy is skilled but he truly does think he is too good for everybody else or something. I don't get his motives though his career is nearing it's final stages at this point.

[crold1]

"To get the Ward loss off my record before I retire would be the best thing to do" - Carl Froch when interviewed TODAY on Skysports.

There's nothing wrong with taking some more major money fights while Ward works out his issues. As stands, no one knows if Ward will be available to fight at all in 2014.