Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mike Tyson VS Bruce Lee. No rules street fight. Who wins and how?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by mrpain81 View Post
    Facts

    Mike Tyson

    Height - 5,11 - Weight - 215lb

    Fighter credentials:

    Amateur fighter - Documented Amateur fights against skilled/trained fighters.

    Professional fights - Documented fights against the best prizefighters in the world, won the heavyweight title becoming the best prizefighter in the world 2 times.

    Street fights - Has documented street fights and arrests for beating up grown men.

    Movie fights - Knocked out the guy on the hangover.

    Other credentials:

    Will fuck you till you love him

    Will eat your children and asshole.

    He's the best ever

    Style impetuous

    Defense impregnable




    Bruce Lee

    Height - 5,7 - Weight - 135lb

    Fighter credentials:


    Amateur fights - No record exist.

    Professional fights - No record exist.

    Street fights - Conflicting reports but no articles or arrest reports of them ever happening.

    Movie fights - Undefeated in movies beating up biggest stronger movie fighters.

    Other credentials:


    1 finger pushups

    Master of making faces and noises

    Can knock people onto a chair with a 1 inch punch
    You need to add the infamous "Gary Elms" to your list for Bruce Lee's notable opponents for Amatuer career.

    Apparently fought "Gary Elms" in the "Hong Kong tournament" in 1958.

    Gary Elms, an alleged "3 Year Boxing Champion" despite no record of his existence before or after. No missing report, nothing.

    There's no record of this tournament either strangely.

    Sources and witness - Bruce Lee's friend.

    Comment


      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
      Me overcomplicating? Seems the other way round to me.

      What I'm saying seems a pretty simple line of thinking.

      Professional fighters..The rest. Pretty simple.

      And no I don't agree with the second sentence. When someone asks another person "Are you a fighter" what I gather they are asking is if they are a professional fighter.

      If someone asks me if I'm a fighter I'm not going to say "Yes" because I had some punch ups with Timmy Jones and Barry Johnson over the park.
      How am I overcomplicating things? By looking at the simple definition of the word? As I said before, you are the one overcomplicating things; for whatever reason you are attaching different words/terms to a word that has a very simple meaning.

      Professional fighters and the rest is correct, but not in the way that you see it. There are professional fighters, who are just one of many types of fighters.

      And no the second sentence of mine was correct. The issue you're stumbling into isn't a result of the person not fitting into the definition of a fighter, it is down to what is implied when asking a particular term. If you ask someone if they're a fighter, most people would assume they're referring to their career; it is really no different to asking someone if they're a doctor, you'd expect a person with a doctorate in Law to say no.

      Comment


        Originally posted by FeFist View Post
        How am I overcomplicating things? By looking at the simple definition of the word? As I said before, you are the one overcomplicating things; for whatever reason you are attaching different words/terms to a word that has a very simple meaning.

        Professional fighters and the rest is correct, but not in the way that you see it. There are professional fighters, who are just one of many types of fighters.
        Well yeah, anyone can have a "fight" but having a fight doesn't make you a fighter.

        Originally posted by FeFist View Post
        And no the second sentence of mine was correct. The issue you're stumbling into isn't a result of the person not fitting into the definition of a fighter, it is down to what is implied when asking a particular term. If you ask someone if they're a fighter, most people would assume they're referring to their career; it is really no different to asking someone if they're a doctor, you'd expect a person with a doctorate in Law to say no.
        Yeah..Precisely.

        I wouldn't call someone who isn't a practising doctor a Doctor just as I wouldn't call someone who isn't a professional fighter a fighter either.

        Simple stuff.

        Comment


          wtf thats a bit unfair bruce lee was justa ****in actor and a media feel good hype..

          Comment


            Originally posted by FeFist View Post
            How am I overcomplicating things? By looking at the simple definition of the word? As I said before, you are the one overcomplicating things; for whatever reason you are attaching different words/terms to a word that has a very simple meaning.

            Professional fighters and the rest is correct, but not in the way that you see it. There are professional fighters, who are just one of many types of fighters.

            And no the second sentence of mine was correct. The issue you're stumbling into isn't a result of the person not fitting into the definition of a fighter, it is down to what is implied when asking a particular term. If you ask someone if they're a fighter, most people would assume they're referring to their career; it is really no different to asking someone if they're a doctor, you'd expect a person with a doctorate in Law to say no.
            Now you are just playing around with language to make some case that Bruce Lee is in some related category to an accomplished professional fighter and he is not, he has no prize fighting accomplishments nor has he ever been proven to have fought and beaten anyone of proven notable fighting skill. Due to lack of documentation its quite possible he had never been in any physical altercation in his entire life.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Chalino Sanchez View Post
              wtf thats a bit unfair bruce lee was justa ****in actor and a media feel good hype..
              Alleged Streetfighter/Actor

              Get it right

              Comment


                Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post
                In a street fight Bruce Lee would win

                One swift BULLET the kneecap or Patella and its a broken LEG

                All Bruce would have to do is feint a punch and SHOOT the kneecap and the fights over

                Size doesn't mean **** vs a GUN

                Fixed it for you.

                Comment


                  Would Bruce Lee engage Tyson? doubtful. My bet is he would try to kick Tyson's knees out. It comes down to is can he do that before Tyson land a hard punch to his head?

                  Comment


                    Mike Tyson wrestles with tigers FFS literally.

                    Bruce Lee wouldn't have a chance in hell against Tyson.

                    Pacquiao however would have a shot. Because he has speed, he has intelligence(target the vulnerable areas like the liver) and he has power.

                    If he can punch like that with gloves, imagine how much he would **** you up without gloves.
                    Last edited by DARKSEID; 03-25-2014, 11:48 PM.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
                      Now you are just playing around with language to make some case that Bruce Lee is in some related category to an accomplished professional fighter and he is not, he has no prize fighting accomplishments nor has he ever been proven to have fought and beaten anyone of proven notable fighting skill. Due to lack of documentation its quite possible he had never been in any physical altercation in his entire life.
                      Bruce Lee had nothing to do with my post. I don't consider the alleged streets fights, nor am I impressed with the one inch punch, broken bag etc.; Mike Tyson would destroy him.

                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                      Well yeah, anyone can have a "fight" but having a fight doesn't make you a fighter.
                      Fitting the definition of the word fighter, means someone isn't a fighter? I'm going to once again say no on that matter. For the third time now, a fighter is someone who simply engages in a fight, so to that end anyone who engages in fights can be labelled a fighter.



                      Yeah..Precisely.

                      I wouldn't call someone who isn't a practising doctor a Doctor just as I wouldn't call someone who isn't a professional fighter a fighter either.

                      Simple stuff.
                      What you wouldn't call someone is on you. The fact of the matter is they would be a doctor in their field of study. The same way someone who is not a professional could be called a fighter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP