continued......
“It’s atrocious,” the Harvard educated lawyer said of the decision. “As a lawyer, I’m offended. I believe in the law and in justice. How do you convict a man without any evidence? Everyone concedes that there is no evidence. To revoke a man on a technicality is horrendous.
When asked by this writer if the sentence would overturned should the test results come back favorable for Margarito in Mid-March, Chairman Timothy Noonan answered “No,” claiming that because the gauze was wet, nothing would be changed.
Arum stated that Margarito’s lawyer would file a writ with the California Superior Court and has plans to try and get Margarito licensed elsewhere in the United States. If not, he will promote Margarito in home country of Mexico.
“It’s atrocious,” the Harvard educated lawyer said of the decision. “As a lawyer, I’m offended. I believe in the law and in justice. How do you convict a man without any evidence? Everyone concedes that there is no evidence. To revoke a man on a technicality is horrendous.
When asked by this writer if the sentence would overturned should the test results come back favorable for Margarito in Mid-March, Chairman Timothy Noonan answered “No,” claiming that because the gauze was wet, nothing would be changed.
Arum stated that Margarito’s lawyer would file a writ with the California Superior Court and has plans to try and get Margarito licensed elsewhere in the United States. If not, he will promote Margarito in home country of Mexico.
Comment