Comments Thread For: The case for Tyson Fury to stay retired

[BrankoB]

Yes, with Josh looking vulnerable I can see tyson licking his lips at his chance of beating josh. I don't think Tyson will pass it up, but retirement isn't far from Tyson mind. Take it one fight at a time.
Who knows, if ddd beats usyk, then I'm sure fury might fancy ddd too.

If DDD beats Usyk it will not be a points decision, it has to be a violet stoppage and in that case Tyson would probably not touch DDD with a six foot pole.

[Liondw]

I'm fine with no Fury-Joshua fight. Fury would've outboxed him easily.

There are heavyweight fights that never happened that I wish we could've seen, like Lewis vs Bowe, though they fought in the amateurs, Bowe vs M.Tyson and Foreman-Tyson.

[SUBZER0ED]

Fury's claim to fame was beating a 39 year old Klitschko and a trilogy with Wilder, who to be honest was a one trick pony and could not box. He almost lost to that guy. Other than that, who has he really beat? He almost lost against a guy who never boxed before, fought a shot Chisora 3 times and other guys like Whyte were compete garbage. When he finally fought someone good, he lost twice against a guy 6" shorter and 60 lbs lighter.

Fury's biggest advantage was his height but he had no power.

Tell that to Wilder.

[SUBZER0ED]

Not sure what he would buy with more money? If he was'nt s t u pid with his money he must be rich beyond his wildest dreams.
One last win might tempt him but what's the point really? If he fights a soft touch we already know he's going to win, and if he takes on a threat he might lose or get hurt.

Personally, I'd have retired a long time ago. Once I got 10 or 20 million in the bank I couldn't see the point in
getting punched in the face.

Fighters are a different kind of breed. They like causing pain and accept that they may receive some as well.

[champion4ever]

Fury suffers from severe mood swings. He is up today and then down tomorrow. Next week he would announce that he was never retiring and fight Anthony Joshua at Wembley; Perhaps sometime in the late spring of this year.

[SUBZER0ED]

He's ruined legacy with Francis ngannou and usyk loss. Now he needs salvage operation by beating josh and ddd.
Always says there's someone more to fight? Fury s not had a 100 fight career like duran, so what's wrong with 2 more?
Nobody asked you to wait 10 years to fight josh. If you don't want Josh fight ddd first, the man who best josh.
Actually, best josh first, so at least you've equalled what ddd did

I agree that the fight vs Ngannou did some harm to Fury's legacy, especially when AJ later destroyed Frances in two rounds. But the Usyk losses didn't ruin his legacy at all. He fought the best in the division and lost two competitive fights. There's no shame in that.

[Phase III]

Why is it so hard to understand that Fury is just looking for attention to stay relevant? Fury is only interested in how much money he can scam Turki for. He has no passion for the sport, he isn’t prepared to put in the hard work to fight at a weight that gives him the best chance to win. He’s only interested in playing his game so he can extract as much Turki money as possible. Who cares about two losers, one shot (AJ) and one on his last legs (TF)? So if Brits love their losers, fine, go at it, but cut the BS retirement game. Look if the Brits want to see two losers let Hearn and Warren stage the fight themselves without the Saudi money. Only then will rational people understand that if that were the case, the fight won’t happen because Hearn and Warren have gotten fat,
d u m b and s t u p I d living off Turki’s lack of boxing knowledge. I keep telling you Warren, Hearn, and Spencer Brown are Turki’s lap dogs.

What proof? Why is Bakole not being mentioned even though he’s also managed by Spencer Brown and a wanted criminal? Because he’s with Boxxer and Warren and Hearn don’t want to put their fighters into losing a fight they can’t make money off.

Turki, go make Bakole v AJ or Bakole v Fury. You can bet your saving that neither Warren or Hearn want any part of that fight because in the case of Hearn, that would be the last time he has a chance to pimp AJ. Isn’t the name of the game to put on the best fights? Fights that are 50/50 and unpredictable? Turki would rather spend ridiculous money on a Canelo v Crawford which is nothing more than a money grab for both fighters. Did anyone see how Crawford looked against Madrimov? Turki, Crawford v V. Ortiz makes sense, but, Crawford want no part of that because he knows Turki is ripe for getting his pockets picked. How about Canelo v the winner of Benevidez v Morrell? Turki, Canelo wants the little guys for the most money, while Crawford just wants his golden parachute. What part of that do you not understand Turki?

How about Inoye v Junto? I’m sure fans would even want Bakole v Dubois, Usyk, or Zhang. Turki, stop being a fan boy and put your money on fights people want. Fury v AJ, is complete BS just like Canelo v Crawford.

[hugh grant]

I agree that the fight vs Ngannou did some harm to Fury's legacy, especially when AJ later destroyed Frances in two rounds. But the Usyk losses didn't ruin his legacy at all. He fought the best in the division and lost two competitive fights. There's no shame in that.

I was being a bit dramatic but ruined legacy in terms of instead of being best of era he's been downgraded.
I mean foreman and frasier probably weren't best of era too but they were nobodies fool, and neither is fury. I like fury.

[rrayvez]

Not very likely that fury stays retired. He’s to unstable for that.

[champion4ever]

Tyson Fury is trolling us all. He shall return. He has too much fight left him in not too.

I repeated this in an earlier post but Fury has never been over matched or even decisively defeated in his entire career.

He’s never been KO, stopped or even beaten up in the ring before. His only losses came from a man who was both exceptional and with a special talent; Which was Okeksandr Usyk.

Likewise, even those two fights were close. Many boxing fans believed he won both of the them as well.