Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Conor Benn targets 147lbs champions but happy to go through Chris Eubank first

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

    It's not an opinion, you've made a claim that Benn has done something and have no evidence to support that claim thus why it is a lie. You need to look up what the words you use mean.

    You making the claim that Benn is happy because of a jurisdiction loophole is a lie. It's as clear as a lie can be.

    You can't just say a flat out lie, and then say "in my opinion" on the end and that somehow makes it not a lie.

    That's like me saying you are gay, in my opinion. (if you aren't gay) that would be a lie.
    just incase u have not noticed, they have not given any reasons for clearing benn, that is a fact

    another fact is that there were reports linking benns lawyers to a loophole, another fact

    until they give the reason for all of this then we wont know for sure the reasons, that is another fact

    3 facts for u

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

      That's like me saying you are gay, in my opinion. (if you aren't gay) that would be a lie.
      u wouldnt know either way, it could be a joke, u could be an ass hole, u could be gay yourself

      i might talk a bit like kell brook

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



        That's like me saying you are gay, in my opinion. (if you aren't gay) that would be a lie.
        what if there was a newspaper article claiming i was gay?

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



          You can't just say a flat out lie, and then say "in my opinion" on the end and that somehow makes it not a lie.
          but its not a lie, i still think eggie might have tried to play that card & until i get the facts of the matter i will continue to believe this MIGHT be the case, this is NOT a lie, its an opinion

          now if i did not in anyway believe what i was saying, in any shape or form, then it would be a lie

          there is a big difference between the two

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by Smash View Post

            just incase u have not noticed, they have not given any reasons for clearing benn, that is a fact

            another fact is that there were reports linking benns lawyers to a loophole, another fact

            until they give the reason for all of this then we wont know for sure the reasons, that is another fact

            3 facts for u
            Right, we don't know. That's a fact.

            So we can't make the claim that it was because of a jurisdiction loophole, like you lied and claimed it was.

            You can speculate it could be the reason, as well as many. But you didn't do that. You claimed it was a the reason, that's a lie.

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by Smash View Post

              u wouldnt know either way, it could be a joke, u could be an ass hole, u could be gay yourself

              i might talk a bit like kell brook
              Right exactly.

              You could be gay. But I don't know if you are or you aren't. I have no evidence to support that you are as it stands.

              So if I were to make the baseless claim you were gay, that would be a lie on my part. Because I don't know.

              Just like you don't know that Benn won his hearing on a jurisdiction loophole. Yet, you claimed that he did. There's the lie.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by Smash View Post

                but its not a lie, i still think eggie might have tried to play that card & until i get the facts of the matter i will continue to believe this MIGHT be the case, this is NOT a lie, its an opinion

                now if i did not in anyway believe what i was saying, in any shape or form, then it would be a lie

                there is a big difference between the two
                So you've just admitted it was a lie you told basically You've just admitted you have no facts on the matter yet have asserted it as truth. That's why what you said was a lie.

                Whether you believe something to be true or not is irrelevant and has no bearing on the lie you've told. I just explained this to you about 5 minutes ago.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



                  Just like you don't know that Benn won his hearing on a jurisdiction loophole. Yet, you claimed that he did. There's the lie.
                  quote me where i said that eggie definitely won his hearing on this loophole please

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Smash View Post

                    quote me where i said that eggie definitely won his hearing on this loophole please
                    "look hes all happy face now, just like he was when he found out about the jurisdiction loophole"

                    There you go.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                      So you've just admitted it was a lie you told basically You've just admitted you have no facts on the matter yet have asserted it as truth. That's why what you said was a lie.

                      Whether you believe something to be true or not is irrelevant and has no bearing on the lie you've told. I just explained this to you about 5 minutes ago.
                      how can i assert something as TRUTH when we have not been given the reasons, its cant be the truth, it has to be an opinion lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP