Originally posted by IronDanHamza
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Conor Benn targets 147lbs champions but happy to go through Chris Eubank first
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Goatintheboat View Post
On Boots last performances Benn rips his head offButt stuff likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
What story broke? There is no story, it doesn't exist.
You're just flat out lying about it and I've already told you that so I'm confused as to why you're still doing it.
I know you don't like Conor Benn, neither do I, I can't stand the guy but the truth is the truth and what you are doing here is flat out lying.
"According to sources for the Daily Mail, Benn’s lawyers argued that UKAD had no jurisdiction to preside over drug samples collected by VADA."
//krikya360.com/warren-o...ppeals--177177
Comment
-
Originally posted by Smash View Post
There were lots of chatter about it even on this web site
"According to sources for the Daily Mail, Benn’s lawyers argued that UKAD had no jurisdiction to preside over drug samples collected by VADA."
//krikya360.com/warren-o...ppeals--177177
There is no "story" of jurisdiction being the reason he won that first hearing vs UKAD. None. Zero.
You've posted articles of people SPECULATING. There is no story that "broke" where anyone from any party involved (NAPD, UKAD, BBBoC, Conor Benn or Chris Eubank) that confirmed or even implied that jurisdiction has anything to do with it. That includes "Benn's Lawyer" like the Daily Mail has falsely claimed there.
So you saying that Benn was happy about a "jurisdiction loophole" is a lie. It's patently false so I don't know why you keep echo'ing it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
So again you've just doubled down on something that doesn't exist. Why?
There is no "story" of jurisdiction being the reason he won that first hearing vs UKAD. None. Zero.
You've posted articles of people SPECULATING. There is no story that "broke" where anyone from any party involved (NAPD, UKAD, BBBoC, Conor Benn or Chris Eubank) that confirmed or even implied that jurisdiction has anything to do with it. That includes "Benn's Lawyer" like the Daily Mail has falsely claimed there.
So you saying that Benn was happy about a "jurisdiction loophole" is a lie. It's patently false so I don't know why you keep echo'ing it.
we DONT HAVE ANY FACTS as to why eggie was cleared & why ukad won their appeal (must be a reason) & why he was cleared again, its all SPECULATION until we get some facts, there were reports on this site and online and in newspapers that eggies lawyers were using the jurisdiction angle to try to get off, since we have NO FACTS this speculation is just as good an yours or anyones elses speculation, its not lies as u said, u said there was NO STORY but there WAS A STORY at the time
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
Why do you keep repeating this lie? I don't get it. You've had it explained to you ad nasuem yet you continue to flat out lie.
What is it going to take for you to understand that Conor Benn has had two hearings with BBBoC/UKAD? Honestly what will it take for you to grasp that?
He literally just had it the other day, and WON IT.
What part are you not understanding?Last edited by thack; Yesterday, 02:41 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Smash View Post
idk i give up with u
we DONT HAVE ANY FACTS as to why eggie was cleared & why ukad won their appeal (must be a reason) & why he was cleared again, its all SPECULATION until we get some facts, there were reports on this site and online and in newspapers that eggies lawyers were using the jurisdiction angle to try to get off, since we have NO FACTS this speculation is just as good an yours or anyones elses speculation, its not lies as u said, u said there was NO STORY but there WAS A STORY at the time
You are making the claim, that Benn "found out a jurisdiction loophole" and was "happy about it" that is a LIE.
The burden of proof is on you to back up that claim with evidence and there is ZERO. "Speculation" is not evidence, it's actually the opposite of evidence.
You've also made a claim, and doubled down again, that there was a "story" that broke that Benn won his hearing due to a Jurisdiction loophole. That, is not true. There is no story of that being the case and no party involved has ever said that, or even implied it.
So what you need to do is stop lying, and stick to what actually happened.Last edited by IronDanHamza; Yesterday, 02:44 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thack View Post
Is it glue your'e on ? Sounds like the board should have you on strict liability ..
What is it going to take for you to understand that Conor Benn has had two hearings with BBBoC/UKAD? Honestly what will it take for you to grasp that?
He literally just had it the other day, and WON IT.
What part are you not understanding?
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
Erm no, you are making a claim here, not me.
You are making the claim, that Benn "found out a jurisdiction loophole" and was "happy about it" that is a LIE.
The burden of proof is on you to back up that claim with evidence and there is ZERO. "Speculation" is not evidence, it's actually the opposite of evidence.
So what you need to do is stop lying, and stick to what actually happened.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
Why don't you actually address what's being said?
What is it going to take for you to understand that Conor Benn has had two hearings with BBBoC/UKAD? Honestly what will it take for you to grasp that?
He literally just had it the other day, and WON IT.
What part are you not understanding?
Comment
Comment