Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Miguel Cotto To Get Taxed By WBO, Even if Non-Title

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    i would like to verify if this is the first time this is happening or is cotto fans the only one crying about having their boy having to pay sanction fees. i believe i've read multiple times that champs have to pay sanction fees for their fights title or no title. so why the bitching?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by coufsax View Post
      I would like to know why he has to pay.
      you know why its called tax?.....coz everyone has to do it.......

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Sin City View Post
        that's a bunch of bull****.
        Cotto should vacate the belt immediately or find another opponent.
        agreed, cotto vs mosley 2 in las vegas! make it happen.

        Comment


          #24
          I say **** it already! I want to see this d@mn fight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by briggs33 View Post
            yeah cotto should just vacate and see what they want to do then..put Pac and Roach in a corner t osee if they are gna bak out and face Mosley or man up and fight Cotto...Cotto doesnt need the WBO he can pick up a new belt in any of his next fights because ever1 in the top 20 has 1 of some kind
            this guy says everyone in the top 20 has a belt that cotto can take.......this is the funniest **** ever.......or maybe not....

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Talisayen View Post
              damn, whinning, bitching, and crying at it's best!!!

              cotto needs to look for another alternative boxer to fight with and get paid $4M max or continue the bout with pacman and pay $150,000 sanctioning fee to put the belt on the line but with a $15M guaranteed purse.

              what do you think is a better option?

              can anybody please give cotto and the nutguggers a calculator to do the math to determine the better option.
              You're alacrity to criticize anybody that does not kneel before Pac is blinding you man. We're talking about the audacity of the organizations to force fighters to pay them sanctioning fees any which way. Why do you think the WBO has named so many different champions: Interim, Super, In recess blah blah blah. Its their way to steal from everybody's hard earned work. And its not like the organizations are helping set up the best fights, if anything they make these fights much, much harder to make. Or are you defending their actions. Be a man and step up with a clear opinion instead of relying on the same ol' tired posts.

              Comment


                #27
                That's really messed up how their doing Cotto. Why can't it be a non
                title fight? And why does he have to pay even if he vacates the title?
                Boxing is becoming more and more greedy as the days go by.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by nj_evoixgsr View Post
                  i would like to verify if this is the first time this is happening or is cotto fans the only one crying about having their boy having to pay sanction fees. i believe i've read multiple times that champs have to pay sanction fees for their fights title or no title. so why the bitching?
                  Why don't you step up with some facts. This kind of shady **** happens all the time but it doesnt make it right. What has to be done is the following, regardless of how ridiculous it sounds: Cotto vacates and the WBO puts up the vacant title in case of a Manny win. If Cotto wins the title remains vacant and a mandatory between whatever two scrubs the WBO think are worthy is put up for a bid. This way everybody wins. Any problems with that?

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by baracuda View Post
                    this guy says everyone in the top 20 has a belt that cotto can take.......this is the funniest **** ever.......or maybe not....
                    He's not right but close.There are sooooo many belts out there for each division.
                    WBO
                    IBF
                    WBC
                    WBA
                    TKO
                    HBO
                    BET
                    ABC
                    CBS
                    NBC
                    CNN

                    Sometimes you don't even know who owns a belt....Cotto? Take the belt into the ring with a trash can and dump it and then tell pacquiao that he can now have it. I would laugh my butt off....Didn't a boxer once do that?

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
                      That's really messed up how their doing Cotto. Why can't it be a non
                      title fight? And why does he have to pay even if he vacates the title?
                      Boxing is becoming more and more greedy as the days go by.
                      yeah....cotto is being persecuted here....victim of a heinous crime...ive never heard of anyone paying his fees before...why are they doing this horrible thing to cotto.....poor guy.......i hope he gets justice....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP