Originally posted by Pelon Psyclone
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Calzaghe beats Jones at any age.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Terrible... View PostCalzaghe is not an unconventional fighter who relied on reflexes their is a reason Hopkins is the better OLD FIGHTER than Jones
there is probably a reason he never fought Eubank,Benn etc etc but it dont mean he avoided them cause he could not beat them does it ?
What kind of **** is this?
ALL fighters rely on their reflexes.
Some choose to develop actual technique to go along with natural abilities.
Roy didn't, and it cost him later in his career.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AceNguyen View PostAre you denying that Roy Jones has declined more than Joe Calzaghe?
Did I say as much or are you simply assuming?
The fact of the matter remains, Joe Calzaghe has slowed down as well when it comes to speed and reflexes.
Prime for prime, its a close fight whether you want to admit it or not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AceNguyen View PostOnce again - so because Old Joe > Old Roy, it means that Prime Joe > Prime Roy too? Isn't there something to be said for some fighters declining rapidly and some having greater longevity? Joe may be greater for a longer period of time, but that has nothing to do with how they fight each other prime for prime.
The difference between Joe now and Joe 7 years ago vs. Jones now and Jones 7 years ago is not even worth comparing, Jones has fallen off a cliff and everyone knows it. Joe has not, hence his ass-kicking of Jones but that doesn't prove anything about a Prime-for-Prime fight.
Round 3 could not have existed a decade ago, Jones could actually throw left hooks back then and had ten times the speed and power.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Wiley Hyena View PostI've never seen a Calzaghe opponent that wasn't confused. Confused fighters tend to lock up and become uncertain. Roy did the same thing. I doubt youth would have alleviated this condition.
He's confused now because he can't throw a left hook or combination and couldn't hurt Calzaghe anymore. If that 3rd round happened in Jones's prime, he would pop a few punches and Calzaghe would have to raise his hands or be knocked down. I would say youth definitely would have alleviated that condition.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wiley Hyena View Post"If your going to say Calzaghe is better then Roy because he beat this Roy than Terry Norris is better then any version of Sugar Ray Leonard. Its the same thing."
No. It's not the same thing at all. First of all Calzaghe is only 3 years younger than Jones. So now you have to consider the issue as to whether or not longevity is an element of true greatness. Surely it is, and Calzaghe wins again. However, if you're disposed to disagree, then one is forced to consider how a prime Calzaghe would have handled a prime Roy. There is absolutely no reason to think that Calzaghe, who in his prime was a lightening fast mongoose of a fighter, could not just as easily have disposed of a prime Roy Jones, Jr. IN the end, "styles make fights." And, Roy simply could not handle Calzaghe's style. NOBODY ever has.
"Disposing of a prime Roy Jones Jr." might be the dumbest thing I ever read in a boxing discussion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wmute View PostActually watching Jones in his prime would be enough of a reason.
"Disposing of a prime Roy Jones Jr." might be the dumbest thing I ever read in a boxing discussion.
Comment
Comment