Originally posted by Ascended
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
James Toney vs Sam Langford
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
Oh, so now it's the angles that made Chaplin walk that way on film, not the speed and quality?
I'm specifically talking about camera effects, camera quality, and angles used with cameras in general, not a person walking, so stop acting ******.yes in all these areas they advanced alot from his time vs 70s-80s movies/shows prove this as fact
Acting was horrible in chaps time compared to even the 50s and 60s, which I consider the best as far as face expressions goes and acting. Alot of people do for the same reason
So you're an idiot like always.
Last edited by Ascended; 04-11-2024, 06:44 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
So you think Charlie Chaplin really walked like that, and walking has advanced, not film, since that time? That's what you're telling me, right?
And please don't tell me what I see as trash. I see your posts as trash if that helps clarify anything for you.
Great post.JAB5239 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ascended View Post
What does walking have to do with what I said? Your comment doesn't make any sense. You slow person. Everything that has advanced with people can't all be looked at the same way, which makes your comment invalid. so stop
I'm specifically talking about camera effects, camera quality, and angles used with cameras in general, not a person walking, so stop acting ******.yes in all these areas they advanced alot from his time vs 70s-80s movies/shows prove this as fact
Acting was horrible in chaps time compared to even the 50s and 60s, which I consider the best as far as face expressions goes and acting. Alot of people do for the same reason
So you're an idiot like always.
them_apples likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
You can't even see you are derailing your own ****** argument. You agree camera's have improved. Therefore given the poor quality from back then effects the way you see fighters fight. You can't have it both ways dopey. You've been owned yet again.
Can you do that?
I never agreed to anything I said what's on video as always
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
You can't even see you are derailing your own ****** argument. You agree camera's have improved. Therefore given the poor quality from back then effects the way you see fighters fight. You can't have it both ways dopey. You've been owned yet again.Willow The Wisp them_apples like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
You can't even see you are derailing your own ****** argument. You agree camera's have improved. Therefore given the poor quality from back then effects the way you see fighters fight. You can't have it both ways dopey. You've been owned yet again.
Last edited by Ascended; 04-11-2024, 07:17 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ascended View Post
60s cam in black and white remember you said color matters to so color+better cam quality compared to 30s-40s and I see these guys don't have the same obsolete tech/flaws and way more advanced but I been owned? Interesting
Comment
Comment