James Toney vs Sam Langford

[QueensburyRules]

- - Sam embarrasses Two Ton more than Roy and makes him quit…simples 4 U simpletons…

[Ascended]

Dude you are lost, can you understand anything? You said it yourself âwords mean nothing to me? Or something like that

I should have been more specific, words said to me going agiasnt my words from video describing exactly what's on video don't matter to me

[JAB5239]

I should have been more specific, words said to me going agiasnt my words from video describing exactly what's on video don't matter to me

Describe what you see on film here. Did people really move like this and have movements advanced, or is it the film quality?

[Ascended]

Describe what you see on film here. Did people really move like this and have movements advanced, or is it the film quality?

already answered that question with the correct answer and told you already that the question of walking is ******. I also told you that every advance a person makes can't all be looked at the same depending on what the job is, so why do you keep asking that ****** question?

[them_apples]

The problem with bouts like this one is the rules have changed so much. In langfords day you can grapple, hold and hit etc. you can’t even picture how it would go down or factor in eachothers strengths because it was a different game. If langford cab’t grapple he might take a huge defensive hit because he isn’t used to it. If he can grapple, Toneys move likely won’t even work.

[JAB5239]

already answered that question with the correct answer and told you already that the question of walking is ******. I also told you that every advance a person makes can't all be looked at the same depending on what the job is, so why do you keep asking that ****** question?

You did not answer the question. I asked you to describe what you saw on the link I posted. I'll simplify it for you once again. Now pay attention. Do you think Charlie Chaplin moved like that in real life? It's a simple yes or no question.

[them_apples]

You did not answer the question. I asked you to describe what you saw on the link I posted. I'll simplify it for you once again. Now pay attention. Do you think Charlie Chaplin moved like that in real life? It's a simple yes or no question.

He’s not gonna know who Chaplin is thats the problem.

[Ascended]

You did not answer the question. I asked you to describe what you saw on the link I posted. I'll simplify it for you once again. Now pay attention. Do you think Charlie Chaplin moved like that in real life? It's a simple yes or no question.

No, that style was how it was done back then; it was a limit of cams. Sports wasn't done that way, or was it as stuttery So again, your question is ******.

You're really slow.

The advances are behind the cam. The person you don't see, not the person you see, see how your comment is odd and ******.

The person using the camera used more angles, cameras with better quality, and used more effects in editing.

this is fact from chaps time even compared to 50s let alone 70s-90s

[JAB5239]

No, that style was how it was done back then; it was a limit of cams. Sports wasn't done that way, or was it as stuttery So again, your question is ******.

You're really slow.

The advances are behind the cam. The person you don't see, not the person you see, see how your comment is odd and ******.

The person using the camera used more angles, cameras with better quality, and used more effects in editing.

this is fact from chaps time even compared to 50s let alone 70s-90s

Oh, so now you're saying every fighter fought in the same style back the.? Brilliant!!! Get your eyes checked kid

[Ascended]

The problem with bouts like this one is the rules have changed so much. In langfords day you can grapple, hold and hit etc. you canât even picture how it would go down or factor in eachothers strengths because it was a different game. If langford cabât grapple he might take a huge defensive hit because he isnât used to it. If he can grapple, Toneys move likely wonât even work.

Interesting, so the rules changed,so tech/angles used/timing/defense doesn’t matter huh?,so how about we drop Sam? How he fought without all that wrestling? Do his punches land on Tony, a way more advanced fighter than his whole era? Even when Tone was a amateur, Tony was way more advanced.

I don't look at that wrestling Sam does, and I only look at his punches and his abilities and flaws. And every area I named he and his opponent looks like novices,I don't see him landing at all fighting that horrible vs. Tony, but since you can't see Sam as obsolete, you're also insane, like your fellow cult members, the one who made that odd comment to me right above this comment.