James Toney vs Sam Langford

[Ascended]

Oh, so now you're saying every fighter fought in the same style back the.? Brilliant!!! Get your eyes checked kid

I never said same style where did you see me say or imply that? They for a fact had all the Same obsolete flaws I proved it mutiple times on video

[JAB5239]

I never said same style where did you see me say or imply that? They for a fact had all the Same obsolete flaws I proved it mutiple times on video

They have the same flaws today, and more that I have pointed out and you have conveniently ignored. I have proved it multiple times on video. And the video's I posted are on .modern cameras. Imagine how fighters today would look on film at a lower speed, from a distance and in black and white?

[Ascended]

They have the same flaws today, and more that I have pointed out and you have conveniently ignored. I have proved it multiple times on video. And the video's I posted are on .modern cameras. Imagine how fighters today would look on film at a lower speed, from a distance and in black and white?

They don't fight from range much; they leave themselves open a lot. A lot of times, they will just throw themselves into the body and not protect themselves. They use mostly counters when up close; the lateral movement is very basic; they don't seem to be able to punch from range while doing it smoothly; they have to stop then punch most of the time; and their feet are mostly tiptoeing. And a lot of times they wait for the person to hit them, standing right in front of their opponent

I posted mutiple vids of guys from the Louis era fighting with these same flaws every last fighter

I asked you before to name the fighters who made mid-card fighting with these same flaws in 70s-90s you couldn't now you're saying fighters now have the same obsolete flaws as I named so go ahead and name the fighters or show the matches,

the exact flaws i named matter alot to me I need exact

[JAB5239]

They don't fight from range much; they leave themselves open a lot. A lot of times, they will just throw themselves into the body and not protect themselves. They use mostly counters when up close; the lateral movement is very basic; they don't seem to be able to punch from range while doing it smoothly; they have to stop then punch most of the time; and their feet are mostly tiptoeing. And a lot of times they wait for the person to hit them, standing right in front of their opponent

I posted mutiple vids of guys from the Louis era fighting with these same flaws every last fighter

I asked you before to name the fighters who made mid-card fighting with these same flaws in 70s-90s you couldn't now you're saying fighters now have the same obsolete flaws as I named so go ahead and name the fighters or show the matches,

the exact flaws i named matter alot to me I need exact

I've posted videos of modern fighters doing the same things. What is mid card fighting? And can you explain how lateral movement has advanced? You make claims and than say you posted video. I've made claims and posted video. Fighters now certainly display the same flaws. You said they do t fight from range. I posted video showing modern fighters not fighting from range. You say the just throw themselves into fighters leaving themselves open. I've posted video of modern fighters doing the same things. On top of that I've argued modern heavyweights don't parry and catch punches as much, use head feints or hand feints as much and do not work the body as much. I'll add that their conditioning isn't as good either. Of course there are exceptions in EVERY era, but you're to blind to not only see it, but to understand it and why. But you have won. I admit it. You have won the top prize so far this year in the game "My life of ignorance and terminal ******ity". Congratulations.

[QueensburyRules]

Heâs not gonna know who Chaplin is thats the problem.

- - That because Charlie being so old, he now so outdated to be on A$$Ended radar....

[Ascended]

I've posted videos of modern fighters doing the same things. What is mid card fighting? And can you explain how lateral movement has advanced? You make claims and than say you posted video. I've made claims and posted video. Fighters now certainly display the same flaws. You said they do t fight from range. I posted video showing modern fighters not fighting from range. You say the just throw themselves into fighters leaving themselves open. I've posted video of modern fighters doing the same things. On top of that I've argued modern heavyweights don't parry and catch punches as much, use head feints or hand feints as much and do not work the body as much. I'll add that their conditioning isn't as good either. Of course there are exceptions in EVERY era, but you're to blind to not only see it, but to understand it and why. But you have won. I admit it. You have won the top prize so far this year in the game "My life of ignorance and terminal ******ity". Congratulations.

No names agian or videos with the exact flaws I named so agian lying in public,you won't post the exact flaws that existed in every louis era fighter cause no fighter made pro with those many obsolete flaws since then,which makes you a liar

all you can show is guys now with flaws of this era which is invalid

[billeau2]

They don't fight from range much; they leave themselves open a lot. A lot of times, they will just throw themselves into the body and not protect themselves. They use mostly counters when up close; the lateral movement is very basic; they don't seem to be able to punch from range while doing it smoothly; they have to stop then punch most of the time; and their feet are mostly tiptoeing. And a lot of times they wait for the person to hit them, standing right in front of their opponent

I posted mutiple vids of guys from the Louis era fighting with these same flaws every last fighter

I asked you before to name the fighters who made mid-card fighting with these same flaws in 70s-90s you couldn't now you're saying fighters now have the same obsolete flaws as I named so go ahead and name the fighters or show the matches,

the exact flaws i named matter alot to me I need exact

What the fck?! Trying to sound smart you really reveal You're ******ity. Have you looked at the comments you posted here?

Range is not a quality that deals with a sum total or a minus. Nor is it something you turn on or off.

And what do you mean leave yourself open a lot? Without a specific example just a totally arbitrary statement. Do you mean they put their face out deliberately?

Counters up close? Without a specific example that makes absolutely no sense. You can counter a jab, you can counter to the body fighting close but countering in close? What the f*** does that mean?

You obviously don't know anything about punching dynamics based on your description of stopping to punch, etc. Just stop

[Marchegiano]

Just gonna go ahead and throw this out there.

They didn't sound like that either.

[Ascended]

Just gonna go ahead and throw this out there.

They didn't sound like that either.

Crazy idiot cult member

[JAB5239]

Just gonna go ahead and throw this out there.

They didn't sound like that either.