Originally posted by JAB5239
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rating Frazier
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Pastrano View PostSimple, they beat more big names. Charles beat Louis, Walcott, Moore, Maxim and Bivins and Patterson beat Johansson, Bonavena, Chuvalo and Moore. They were just better boxers than Big George. Charles would pick Foreman apart, much like Young did. Only Charles had a better punch than Young.
I also don't see how beating Louis, Walcott, Moore, Maxim and Bivins is better than those wins either. Aswell as considering the stage of career some of those fighters were in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Holtol View PostI think a lot of athletes get away with taking peds and some don't get away with it.
I understand and agree with you. But we're talking about heavyweights here. One was a super heavyweight as an amateur, the other a light heavyweight. There is strong evidence suggesting one took PED's, while there is no evidence against the other.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostI don't see how beating Johansson, Chuvalo, Bonavena and Moore is better than beating Fraizer X2, Norton, Chuvalo and Lyle all in 5 rounds or less aswell AND coming back 17 years later to win a world title.
I also don't see how beating Louis, Walcott, Moore, Maxim and Bivins is better than those wins either. Aswell as considering the stage of career some of those fighters were in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pastrano View PostWalcott, Moore and Bivins were all prime and Louis is still Louis, prime or not. The man hit hard. As I already said, Frazier was just too small for Foreman and Lyle, Lyle made the mistake of brawling with a stronger man-and nearly stopped him! Lyle was nothing more than a big puncher. Chuvalo was stopped on cuts, Patterson outpointed him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
I understand and agree with you. But we're talking about heavyweights here. One was a super heavyweight as an amateur, the other a light heavyweight. There is strong evidence suggesting one took PED's, while there is no evidence against the other.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pastrano View PostWalcott, Moore and Bivins were all prime and Louis is still Louis, prime or not. The man hit hard. As I already said, Frazier was just too small for Foreman and Lyle, Lyle made the mistake of brawling with a stronger man-and nearly stopped him! Lyle was nothing more than a big puncher. Chuvalo was stopped on cuts, Patterson outpointed him.
Size aside he was the Lineal HW champion and undefeated and Foreman destoryed him.
We're going to have to agree to disagree. I will never agree to Pattersons resume and Charles' HW resume being better than Foreman's.
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostYou don't lose your power with age, you lose your ability to land it.
Tuia was too slow to get inside Lewis's reach to land cleanly. Morrison was a bad joke who would have lost to Cooney. Bruno fell short every time he stepped up. Briggs' power is grossly overrated, usually by people trying to make Lewis look good. Vitali is solid puncher but not a tremendous puncher and with Tyson you can use the same argument that you're using with Louis.....you don't get to have it both ways.
Poet
To be honest, that version of Tyson isnt evenTop 5 of the hardest punchers Lennox faced, But still better than the best Marciano faced.
Comment
-
Comment