Originally posted by Richard Richardson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
Aubrey needed no defense. He didn’t commit any crime. He was jogging.
That you feel you needed to defend him shows how race impacts your thinking and judgement.
You should’ve thought before posting that.
Also here is the other way you show how racist you are- whether it’s Aubrey, Floyd or king you name them as being on trial when it’s the white men that were.
You didn’t do that with OJ though.
Clearly you have racial issues.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
Weak.
The autopsy itself was performed on May 26. With the PRELIMINARY findings stating that Floyd had a level of fentanyl in his system that was fatal under normal circumstances.
But the final, official report on that autopsy didn’t come out until June 1. After there had been time for B.L.M goons to destroy property and for the Minnesota Attorney General to take over the prosecution after public outcry.
You see his cause of death written there in the autopsy plainly 12 hours after death. Duck it like the bltch you are
keep trying to make up excuses. But we both know I exposed your idiocy as usual
Last edited by travestyny; 05-09-2025, 03:49 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post
LOL.. when did i said that? i posted several times on here that i dont agree with Chauvin's actions but it's hard for me to defend GF because he was on drugs! how many times i gotta repeat this?
If GF wasnt on drugs then, 100% i back him up... just like I did with the Arbery case.
I am not going to scour the threads to find them. If me not doing this allows you to claim I am lying, so be it.
But we both know you’re on record as posting this.
Floyd isn’t on trial. He doesn’t need your defending. That you frame it like this illustrates your racial issues.
Again, that you actually keep saying you defended Aubrey makes you look worse.
Aubrey was a victim that was jogging. He did nothing wrong.
What possibly do you have to defend him from? Jogging while black. Self defense against racists?Last edited by The Big Dunn; 05-09-2025, 03:58 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
Aubrey needed no defense. He didn’t commit any crime. He was jogging.
That you feel you needed to defend him shows how race impacts your thinking and judgement.
You should’ve thought before posting that.
Also here is the other way you show how racist you are- whether it’s Aubrey, Floyd or king you name them as being on trial when it’s the white men that were.
You didn’t do that with OJ though.
Clearly you have racial issues.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
You have often said blacks dont comply and resist. You’ve made blanket statements.
I am not going to scour the threads to find them. If me not doing this allows you to claim I am lying, so be it.
But we both know you’re on record as posting this.
Floyd isn’t on trial. He doesn’t need your defending. That you frame it like illustrates your racial issues.
Again, that you actually keep saying you defended Aubrey makes you loon worse.
Aubrey was a victim that was jogging. He did nothing wrong.
What possibly do you have to defend him from? Jogging while black. Self defense against racists?
anyways, short day at work.. we'll catch up on this on Monday.. hope you have a great rest of your day and have a great weekend.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post
because OJ is guilty! yall blacks even made rap songs talking about committing a murder then hiring Johnnie Cochran to get out of it... why would blacks say this if yall dont believe OJ walked free from a murder case!
OJ was the criminal on trial. So yeah it’s the OJ case. Aubrey, Floyd and King were victims. Yet you say their case as if they were on trial. Chauvin, white cops, and the two racists were on trial.
That illustrates your issues with race. You treat black victims as if they are on trial.
Please dude read carefully.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 05-09-2025, 03:59 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post
NEVER.. only when they actually resisted!!! i hate cops dude..
anyways, short day at work.. we'll catch up on this on Monday.. hope you have a great rest of your day and have a great weekend.
Dont you know this?
Yeah you better run after that ether I gave you about Aubrey and your racial issues.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 05-09-2025, 03:57 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
Yeah, the medical examiner appears to have changed his tune between the preliminary findings and the final report.
But are you saying he was incorrect when he said that that Floyd had fatal levels of fentanyl in his system? Based on Floyd having 11 ng/mL while deaths have been certified at 3?
He didn’t change anything. He states it clearly here. It was the top line of the autopsy and he states it is STILL his top line. Liar.
"My opinion remains unchanged," Baker said as his testimony concluded. "It's what I put on the death certificate last June. That's cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint and neck compression."
"That was my top line then," he added. "It would stay my top line now."
Last edited by travestyny; 05-09-2025, 04:09 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
Lmao. Weak that you got proven wrong and you can’t admit it.
You see his cause of death written there in the autopsy plainly 12 hours after death. Duck it like the bltch you are
keep trying to make up excuses. But we both know I exposed your idiocy as usual
The official autopsy report didn’t come out until June 1.
What part of that don’t you understand?
Hector Enrique likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment