Charlie Kirk Sets B.L.M Supporter Straight On George Floyd

[The Big Dunn]

why are you talking about testimonies and reports there is a video out there where we can see how he acted be honest youve never even watched it have you....

Because that is what matters in court and clarifies what is seen in video.

No you draw a false conclusion for racial reasons as you try to defend Chauvin.

Yes I have. I am just ignoring your race and agenda driven interpretation of it.

Final point- if Chauvin hadn’t lied, maybe he could have testified to contradict what those filming said at trial.

Oops too bad.

[IceTrayDaGang]

This post seems to imply this is the only way a black man can like Floyd can become claustrophobic.

Is this what you mean?

What you did in this post would never stand up in a court of law. You guys keep just throwing anything to the wall to try and blame the victim because he is black.

Chauvin is in prison because of his actions.

I already beat you to that... check my post explaining that GF being black has nothing to do my with decision! I just want you to acknowledge that he on drugs!!! It's hard to defend someone on drugs because there's no way to tell how a person is going to act..

[IceTrayDaGang]

and before you say i am being racist because GF is black.. i defended Ahmaud Arbrey so you cant say i am being racist because GF is black.

i just cant defend GF here because he has drugs in his system.. it doesnt matter if he was white, i would have said the same thing.

The Big Dunn

[IceTrayDaGang]

The Big Dunn

it has nothing to do with race... I already said I dont agree with the actions of Chauvin but then again GF was on drugs!

[The Big Dunn]

I already beat you to that... check my post explaining that GF being black has nothing to do my with decision! I just want you to acknowledge that he on drugs!!! It's hard to defend someone on drugs because there's no way to tell how a person is going to act..

Of course it does. You have an agenda where you state blacks don’t comply with police so it’s ok for police to do whatever they want.

You never have held police accountable for violating the rights of black people. As an example, you were ok with stop and frisk despite it being found unconstitutional.

He wasn’t on drugs such that it contributed to his death as you, Madison and others falsely portray.

Cops don’t know if what they are seeing is a drug reaction or not. The person could be having a stroke, not saying Floyd did.

That is why they are trained to handle situations a specific way. It’s the job. If you can’t handle it get another one.

[The Big Dunn]

The Big Dunn

it has nothing to do with race... I already said I dont agree with the actions of Chauvin but then again GF was on drugs!

Like I said - you have a clear agenda when it comes to black peoples and police interactions. You have stated this multiple times.

You don’t care if police violate the rights of black people in these situations.

To now try and run away from that because I am calling you out for it is weak on your part.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Of course it does. You have an agenda where you state blacks don’t comply with police so it’s ok for police to do whatever they want.

You never have held police accountable for violating the rights of black people. As an example, you were ok with stop and frisk despite it being found unconstitutional.

He wasn’t on drugs such that it contributed to his death as you, Madison and others falsely portray.

Cops don’t know if what they are seeing is a drug reaction or not. The person could be having a stroke, not saying Floyd did.

That is why they are trained to handle situations a specific way. It’s the job. If you can’t handle it get another one.

LOL.. when did i said that? i posted several times on here that i dont agree with Chauvin's actions but it's hard for me to defend GF because he was on drugs! how many times i gotta repeat this?

If GF wasnt on drugs then, 100% i back him up... just like I did with the Arbery case.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Like I said - you have a clear agenda when it comes to black peoples and police interactions. You have stated this multiple times.

You don’t care if police violate the rights of black people in these situations.

To now try and run away from that because I am calling you out for it is weak on your part.

please kindly bump those post up!!

[The Big Dunn]

The Big Dunn

Aubrey needed no defense. He didn’t commit any crime. He was jogging.

That you feel you needed to defend him shows how race impacts your thinking and judgement.

You should’ve thought before posting that.

Also here is the other way you show how racist you are- whether it’s Aubrey, Floyd or king you name them as being on trial when it’s the white men that were.

You didn’t do that with OJ though.

Clearly you have racial issues.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Like I said - you have a clear agenda when it comes to black peoples and police interactions. You have stated this multiple times.

You don’t care if police violate the rights of black people in these situations.

To now try and run away from that because I am calling you out for it is weak on your part.

matter fact, i hate cops!! so what are you even talking about lol? i have made it clear on here that i dont like cops!