Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao Denies Steroid Use, Roach Blasts Floyd

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Eaner0919 View Post
    oh I know sir

    but I counter that with

    if it's indeed all water weight like you think then why does he look very similar in all his weigh in pics? look it up as you say.

    12 more lbs in 9 months is all hydrating or not cutting?

    I have a hard time believing that sir. Not to say I believe Manny is indeed taking PEDs but for anyone to solely dismiss this as Sr's rantings when other people whose opinions I respect and trust have expressed the same questions is being a bit naive
    wow! the guy gained 3 lbs. in over a year while jumping 2 divisions.

    he must be on roids.

    pacquiao-marquez 2 at super featherweight march 2008

    weigh in weight - 130

    fight night weight - 145





    pacquiao hatton at junior welterweight may 2009

    weigh in weight - 138

    fight night weight - 148

    Comment


      Originally posted by str8balln
      steroids are hormones that cause masculinity in females because of the testosterone included in it. females, obviously dont have these hormones, thats why when they take it, it causes masculinity in their physique. it doesnt explain ur point that it enlarges the head of a man.

      again ive never heard this from any medical standpoint. if there's no backed up facts and all is based from heresay and images and points of view of people uneducated with medications... then there's no point in giving out opinions that are not backed up.

      by the way...the testosterone used in steroids are used for increased muscle mass....not *********** of bones.

      that's why i dont get the reasoning behind steroids makin a head bigger...for that to happen bones need to enlarge, the skull needs to grow.


      This was my post:


      Some of the data points are:

      1. Other Roach trained fighters/athletes have tested positive for steroids
      2. Pac's obvious size increases while maintaining exceedingly lean muscle mass
      3. A culture of steroid use around the Wild Card gym
      Etc...

      less credible and specific has been "have you noticed how disproportionately large Pac's head is?" and "overseas athletes are more prone to PED use because the culture is more permissive".


      Please do not try to twist or misrepresent what I said. Despite English being my third language, i am pretty decent with words. Generally.

      Comment


        Originally posted by str8balln View Post
        not confused. where's ur post at?
        See post # 165

        Comment


          Originally posted by Al Haymon View Post
          This was my post:


          Some of the data points are:

          1. Other Roach trained fighters/athletes have tested positive for steroids
          2. Pac's obvious size increases while maintaining exceedingly lean muscle mass
          3. A culture of steroid use around the Wild Card gym
          Etc...

          less credible and specific has been "have you noticed how disproportionately large Pac's head is?" and "overseas athletes are more prone to PED use because the culture is more permissive".


          Please do not try to twist or misrepresent what I said. Despite English being my third language, i am pretty decent with words. Generally.
          so in your first data point : since other athletes trained y roach tested positive...that makes pacquiao positive?


          i mean no disrespect as we are all open to everyone's opinions...

          but where's the data point about the subject of the accusation? PAC?

          its like were jumpin to conclusions.."since all roach's trained figthers tested for steroids (where actually did you find this fact?) and there is a culture of steroid use in the wild card gym....we conclude that pacquiao is positive of steroid use?


          get my point? i dont know...maybe we're misunderstanding each other.

          a test will validate these accusations.

          *ur point with the increase in weight but still having lean muscles do warrant questioning...and i agree with you on that.
          Last edited by str8balln; 09-16-2009, 01:49 PM.

          Comment


            Originally posted by str8balln

            by the way...the testosterone used in steroids are used for increased muscle mass....not *********** of bones.

            that's why i dont get the reasoning behind steroids makin a head bigger...for that to happen bones need to enlarge, the skull needs to grow.
            Actually, isn't acromegaly a fairly common side effect of hGH?

            Comment


              Originally posted by str8balln View Post
              so in your first data point : since other athletes trained y roach tested positive...that makes pacquiao positive?


              i mean no disrespect as we are all open to everyone's opinions...

              but where's the data point about the subject of the accusation? PAC?

              its like were jumpin to conclusions.."since all roach's trained figthers tested for steroids (where actually did you find this fact?) and there is a culture of steroid use in the wild card gym....we conclude that pacquiao is positive of steroid use?


              get my point? i dont know...maybe we're misunderstanding each other.

              a test will validate these accusations.
              You are misunderstanding, because you either skipped some posts... or jumped in mid-******.

              i will RE-POST, and then i'd like you to tell me what I said that has sent you into this tailspin.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Mr._Pink View Post
                yes a guy who is on the slide , several years older and a natural featherweight will beat floyd at 147. yup.
                That's why he called it upset! No need to elaboarate much of PBF advantages!

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Al Haymon View Post
                  Actually, isn't acromegaly a fairly common side effect of hGH?
                  i have taken care of patients with acromegally

                  for it to be acromegally you hands, feet, ears, mouth nose, jaw line etc....needs to be humongous and very obviously out of line with the other body parts.

                  u dont diagnose a person with acromegally because his head is damn huge though.
                  Last edited by str8balln; 09-16-2009, 01:54 PM.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by str8balln View Post


                    get my point? i dont know...maybe we're misunderstanding each other.
                    .
                    Original post:



                    If I had to bet my mortgage, I would say that Pac gears up.

                    Of course, it is simply my opinion, and the 'evidence' is all circumstantial and indirect. However, there is copious data swirling around him...and where there's smoke, there's usually fire.


                    Str8balln,

                    Now, if you think "Al haymon" is an idiot, that's fine. but i was VERY specific that it was solely my opinion, and the 'evidence' (in quotes, no less) is circumstantial.

                    It is comical (yet somewhat disappointing) how the posters in this thread are doing the same thing that they are charging Floyd, Sr with.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Al Haymon View Post
                      Actually, isn't acromegaly a fairly common side effect of hGH?

                      Does Pac have long ass fingers a common side effect of HGH?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP