Russia has started destroying Isis in Syria

[jaded]

Assad is air-striking and barrel bombing children/women/men in the open in front of their family members too. It's just that ISIL scares the F out of people cause they revel in it, assad tries to hide it. Really the only difference, and Assad has the much higher body count.

IDK where you're getting this perception that Assad is somehow more just, and he kills prisoners of all variety far from (mostly male combatants)

Don't get me wrong...I'm not the least bit pro Assad. But the Assad's always have been and always will be how the middle east works...or rather doesn't work.

I'm also going to add that it's difficult to filter what is the reality being reported and just how much is propaganda to sell the interests (oil) of the powers that be. All i know is that if Isis is not stopped they will continue to gobble up more and more of the ****** world. This is what scares Iran...they don't want Isis on their Iraqi border.

[BKM-2010]

In terms of death toll, Assad makes ISIL look good not the other way, sure they both are terrible but Assad is by far responsible for the most civilian deaths in Syria. He's not the better of two evils, hes just one of many evils.

You are brainwashed by your American propaganda. Assad is the type of strong leader that a middle eastern country needs to be stable. These people do not understand anything else other than a brutal rule with an iron fist.

The casualties from Assad's troops are the same reason Israel kills many *********** civilians: The rebels(***** in this case) are operating purposely in populated areas so that IF they get hit back, there will be many unfortunate innocent deaths and you know what that means? "LOOK AT HOW THEY KILL WOMEN AND CHILDREN!" Hook line and sinker, people eat that propaganda up. It's a win/win for rebels because if the goverment stops this, they will lose the civilian war and end up like Gaddafi slaughtered like a pig on the streets.

The Saddam's, Gaddafi's etc. they are what keeps the country under control, they seperate Islam from goverment as much as possible but the Islamic low IQ people do not want to accept that. And on the other hand they wouldn't want a hell-like life under Sharia Law either, and definitely not a democracy either.

You need to dig deeper on these 'dictating regimes' to also see the immense amount of positive things they did for their countries. You need another perspective other than what the media nitpicks and shows you.

[Rudyo]

You are brainwashed by your American propaganda. Assad is the type of strong leader that a middle eastern country needs to be stable. These people do not understand anything else other than a brutal rule with an iron fist.

The casualties from Assad's troops are the same reason Israel kills many *********** civilians: The rebels(***** in this case) are operating purposely in populated areas so that IF they get hit back, there will be many unfortunate innocent deaths and you know what that means? "LOOK AT HOW THEY KILL WOMEN AND CHILDREN!" Hook line and sinker, people eat that propaganda up. It's a win/win for rebels because if the goverment stops this, they will lose the civilian war and end up like Gaddafi slaughtered like a pig on the streets.

The Saddam's, Gaddafi's etc. they are what keeps the country under control, they seperate Islam from goverment as much as possible but the Islamic low IQ people do not want to accept that. And on the other hand they wouldn't want a hell-like life under Sharia Law either, and definitely not a democracy either.

You need to dig deeper on these 'dictating regimes' to also see the immense amount of positive things they did for their countries. You need another perspective other than what the media nitpicks and shows you.

No, you need to wake up and see the truth. I know it's cool to not like America and all. And especially at the start of the conflict, there was a lot of PR against Assad as people were swept up in the Arab Spring. But you have to look at the reality on the ground and see that Assad is a piece of **** too. And just cause they ruled with an iron fist for decades, doesn't mean they're good leaders the countries "need" plus now the genies out of the bottle. There's not gonna be a future for that kind of cold war big man in the future.

As you can tell though, I don't really value your opinion anyways, especially since you called them "Islamic low IQ people".

And BTW just for other people, im not downplaying the danger of ISIL, but people who want to like team up with Assad need to know who they're dealing with. He's a big reason for the rise of ISIL, he kinda sublet them part of the country. Now they're gonna get rid of all the moderate opposition, and smaller groups. The goal for Assad is to be the only other option besides Nusra and ISIL.

[BKM-2010]

No, you need to wake up and see the truth. I know it's cool to not like America and all. And especially at the start of the conflict, there was a lot of PR against Assad as people were swept up in the Arab Spring. But you have to look at the reality on the ground and see that Assad is a piece of **** too. And just cause they ruled with an iron fist for decades, doesn't mean they're good leaders the countries "need" plus now the genies out of the bottle. There's not gonna be a future for that kind of cold war big man in the future.

As you can tell though, I don't really value your opinion anyways, especially since you called them "Islamic low IQ people".

And BTW just for other people, im not downplaying the danger of ISIL, but people who want to like team up with Assad need to know who they're dealing with. He's a big reason for the rise of ISIL, he kinda sublet them part of the country. Now they're gonna get rid of all the moderate opposition, and smaller groups. The goal for Assad is to be the only other option besides Nusra and ISIL.

Right, I won't be able to sleep now that I know some brainwashed online pothead hippie doesn't value my opinion. Good to know.

Much like I expected you ignored my explanation of the anti-Assad propaganda that you yanks eat up. All you can say is "Assad is a piece of ****" because you read all those yank headlines "Assad kills civilians" thinking it's that black and white and not realising that the situation is a lot more complex. It is the rebels' tactic to make sure they get hit in highly populated civilian areas just like *****. That's how Islamic ********* scum operate pal, they play onto your feeling. Hook line and sinker.

I'm from the middle east and still have relatives living there. They all need strong, brutal goverments to keep the wrath of Islam in check. But that is only one aspect of running a country. Your media doesn't show you the level of education for children, the building of roads, hospitals, clean running water and electricity being developed in primitive parts of the countries, the protection of religious ********** from Islam, all these things that Saddam, Gaddafi and Assad THRIVED in.

They can have those type of peaceful countries, all they have to do is not oppose the goverments and create rebel groups. That's too much to ask? Oh yeah, that's not democracy, so you guys need to invade them, displace the "dictators" and tell me again, how well has that worked out for Iraq, Syria and Libya etc? And you wonder why I bust American balls.

[I Love Jesus!]

russia doesnt play around

[Rudyo]

Right, I won't be able to sleep now that I know some brainwashed online pothead hippie doesn't value my opinion. Good to know.

Much like I expected you ignored my explanation of the anti-Assad propaganda that you yanks eat up. All you can say is "Assad is a piece of ****" because you read all those yank headlines "Assad kills civilians" thinking it's that black and white and not realising that the situation is a lot more complex. It is the rebels' tactic to make sure they get hit in highly populated civilian areas just like *****. That's how Islamic ********* scum operate pal, they play onto your feeling. Hook line and sinker.

I'm from the middle east and still have relatives living there. They all need strong, brutal goverments to keep the wrath of Islam in check. But that is only one aspect of running a country. Your media doesn't show you the level of education for children, the building of roads, hospitals, clean running water and electricity being developed in primitive parts of the countries, the protection of religious ********** from Islam, all these things that Saddam, Gaddafi and Assad THRIVED in.

They can have those type of peaceful countries, all they have to do is not oppose the goverments and create rebel groups. That's too much to ask? Oh yeah, that's not democracy, so you guys need to invade them, displace the "dictators" and tell me again, how well has that worked out for Iraq, Syria and Libya etc? And you wonder why I bust American balls.

Brainwashed online hippie pothead>>>>> ****ing moron. So I'm all good. I don't even think you're from the middle east btw, I think you are just a ****ing moron from IDK the UK?

The higher casualties happen in Assad controlled areas because thats where the majority of fighting takes place. It's not some huge tatic by those sneaky rebels, but it is Assad that is ignoring the collateral damage attacking those areas cause so he's as guilty as the people using human shields, which is not what is causing this btw. I'm not one of those americans that get mad at like "yank" or that kind of baiting anyways so sure throw that out there as well.

Go **** yourself too btw.

Muzscum, way to be classy, you piece of ****.

[Rudyo]

BTW, since I'm such a ****** pothead, shouldn't you be really trashing me in this debate Mayweather style? All I've heard from you is the typical response of "Your American media deceives you" I haven't heard you make a single valid point, or mention anything that makes you seem like you undestand anything about your "home" region.

[BKM-2010]

I don't even think you're from the middle east btw, I think you are just a ****ing moron from IDK the UK?

Perhaps you regularly get schooled and humiliated by Brits here, but no I'm from a country you would call paradise you drugged up, hippie ass numb skull. Don't come to Amsterdam, we don't want you here.

The higher casualties happen in Assad controlled areas because thats where the majority of fighting takes place. It's not some huge tatic by those sneaky rebels

Well isn't it nice that you are giving those rebels the benefit of the doubt? That is very sweet of you, But if the FREE SYRIA ARMY is intent on you know, FREEING SYRIA for the good, then pulling a ***** and making sure that if they get hit, as many civilians get hit as possible isn't exactly good for their cause is it? Or are you gonna blame their zero regard for civilian life on Assad as well?

but it is Assad that is ignoring the collateral damage attacking those areas cause so he's as guilty as the people using human shields,

Nice, we're making progress here. You are almost scolding the human shield scum as much as you are the big bad evil Lion of Damascus. Maybe this thought process occured right before you took another hit.

Muzscum, way to be classy, you piece of ****.

I once had *** with Muhammad(pigs pee upon him) rotting skull. In one eye, out the other. "U mad?" as you guys would say.

All I've heard from you is the typical response of "Your American media deceives you" I haven't heard you make a single valid point, or mention anything that makes you seem like you undestand anything about your "home" region.

Lets see I've explained to you that the rebels you love so much are not what they seem, I explained to you why exactly so many innocent people have been hit by bombs, I've explained that if Assad's troop stop doing this they will lose the civil war and get slaughtered in the streets by your "progressive FSA army". I've given a quick rundown on all the positive things that have been done by what your US Media dubs 'evil dictators' which you didn't respond. I asked you how much better the countries have become after the good ol USA removed those guys, no response from you. Etc. I think I've made myself pretty clear here, you on the other hand have lost your cool and are now only focused on ad hominems, the sign of a loser. Good talk.

[Rudyo]

Perhaps you regularly get schooled and humiliated by Brits here, but no I'm from a country you would call paradise you drugged up, hippie ass numb skull. Don't come to Amsterdam, we don't want you here.



Well isn't it nice that you are giving those rebels the benefit of the doubt? That is very sweet of you, But if the FREE SYRIA ARMY is intent on you know, FREEING SYRIA for the good, then pulling a ***** and making sure that if they get hit, as many civilians get hit as possible isn't exactly good for their cause is it? Or are you gonna blame their zero regard for civilian life on Assad as well?

Nice, we're making progress here. You are almost scolding the human shield scum as much as you are the big bad evil Lion of Damascus. Maybe this thought process occured right before you took another hit.



I once had *** with Muhammad(pigs pee upon him) rotting skull. In one eye, out the other. "U mad?" as you guys would say.



Lets see I've explained to you that the rebels you love so much are not what they seem, I explained to you why exactly so many innocent people have been hit by bombs, I've explained that if Assad's troop stop doing this they will lose the civil war and get slaughtered in the streets by your "progressive FSA army". I've given a quick rundown on all the positive things that have been done by what your US Media dubs 'evil dictators' which you didn't respond. I asked you how much better the countries have become after the good ol USA removed those guys, no response from you. Etc. I think I've made myself pretty clear here, you on the other hand have lost your cool and are now only focused on ad hominems, the sign of a loser. Good talk.

Nah ain't lost my cool, as you say I'm always high, I'm always kool brutha. The FSA is a joke anyways, the west will not solve the Syria crisis. This is a long haul deal. FSA and the rebel groups are ****, but so is Assad. I've been to amsterdam, was kinda cool. $$ though. I'm not a ****** either though, and I was born in the proper UK, sure I moved to USA early on but I'm tech not even a yank.

I'm not even saying the rebels would be a better solution, but they're all war criminals. And with this recent influx of support, people are acting like Assad is the peaceful alternative, and deifying him almost when he's as guilty as the rest. Rebels have commited war crimes, Assad has, ISIL has etc etc.. All sides have even used chemical weapons, so all I'm implying is that there is no "good" side to pit against the other.

US showed we have no control by our attempts to arm "moderate rebels" who gave it over to Nusra. But Russia isn't going to come in and clean it up either. You're mistaking me for a ******* btw, I'm not really. I just swear when I feel the need to.

And the attempt by you to try to make me seem dumb by always throwing out pot insults, just makes me laugh. <3

[Mr Ehrmantraut]

Assad is a boss.

No one can take his title. He's putting up Tom Brady type numbers.