Should First Cousins be Allowed to Marry?

[Russian Crushin]

Yet you can't name a single one.



I am saying that if an animal exclusively has *** for the purposes of procreation, then they're probably not having gay ***, nor would they exhibit gay tendencies. As I've previously stated, what many observe as "gay ***" among animals is neither gay nor ***.

#1 i named humans, which are animals

#2 you have a computer and it probably has internet, which probably has google, or yahoo if you prefer, so im sure you can find out which animals

Ok so you made up a definition for what exactly defines *******uality, and you want me to accept it? cmon

[Russian Crushin]

They shouldn't, it probably put in place because that environment breeds the next generation.

Maybe giving extra benefits for just having children could be the way to go, but then that could lead to people just have children to early and more broken homes and the children suffering.


Why should gay/lesbians get these rights? For just having a ***ual relationship?

What happens if someone is not married can't they have the same rights.

Example Floyd might want 50 cent to be his next of kin to be 50 cent, now say if their relationship is not ***ual, it wouldn't be allowed but if was they would get those rights.

If people want the right to name one other person for next of kin and inheritance rights, then it should be open to everybody.

Are you trying to say gays cant love each other?

And by the last sentence, you basically give a reason for why gays should be allowed to marry, you know that right

You are very ignorant of the certain benefits that married couples receive

[D4thincarnation]

So because *******uality is more "common", it shoule be illegal

And how does equal rights = extra rights? Please explain

New York calculated that the states economy would gain $210 mil in the 3 years following gay marriage allowance. SOunds like giving back to society to me

Now explain to me exactly what banning gay marriage contributes to society, except discrimination of course

Why should they get extra right. I take it your single, not married, they could be paying less tax, get inheritance rights and the rest for what, having *** with the same person?

How does it reward society?

I personally think marriage should have no legal place in society and everyone should have the right to nominate one person so they they get their inheritance rights and next of kins.

There, all equal there.

Happy?

[D4thincarnation]

Are you trying to say gays cant love each other?

And by the last sentence, you basically give a reason for why gays should be allowed to marry, you know that right

You are very ignorant of the certain benefits that married couples receive

No, i'm saying you don't need to be in ***ual relationship to love someone.

[Russian Crushin]

Why should they get extra right. I take it your single, not married, they could be paying less tax, get inheritance rights and the rest for what, having *** with the same person?

How does it reward society?

I personally think marriage should have no legal place in society and everyone should have the right to nominate one person so they they get their inheritance rights and next of kins.

There, all equal there.

Happy?

OMG they want EQUAL rights what part of that is sooooo hard to understand. Stop using the word "extra" out of context.

ANd i explained exactly how gay marriage would reward society, now explain to me how banning it will

And everybody does have that equal right.....well except gays that is

[Jim Jeffries]

It has become too obvious that you're just trolling, but I have a few minutes to burn.

#1 i named humans, which are animals

Not exactly evidence of it occurring elsewhere in nature, is it? Quit stalling, you claimed there are "thousands," surely one example isn't beyond your grasp.

#2 you have a computer and it probably has internet, which probably has google, or yahoo if you prefer, so im sure you can find out which animals

Google what? Some gay activists' subjective opinions on what might constitute *******ual "tendencies" in animals? No thanks.

Ok so you made up a definition for what exactly defines *******uality, and you want me to accept it? cmon

Excuse me for assuming that *******uality involved ***. Perhaps you could enlighten me.

[Russian Crushin]

No, i'm saying you don't need to be in ***ual relationship to love someone.

Yea......so?

[D4thincarnation]

Yea......so?

So why should those people miss out on those rights?

[D4thincarnation]

OMG they want EQUAL rights what part of that is sooooo hard to understand. Stop using the word "extra" out of context.

ANd i explained exactly how gay marriage would reward society, now explain to me how banning it will

And everybody does have that equal right.....well except gays that is

It is not equal because a lot of people don't get those rights, if it was equal everyone would have them.

Understand?

[Russian Crushin]

It has become too obvious that you're just trolling, but I have a few minutes to burn.



Not exactly evidence of it occurring elsewhere in nature, is it? Quit stalling, you claimed there are "thousands," surely one example isn't beyond your grasp.



Google what? Some gay activists' subjective opinions on what might constitute *******ual "tendencies" in animals? No thanks.



Excuse me for assuming that *******uality involved ***. Perhaps you could enlighten me.

So you call me out on being a biology major, yet refuse to acknowledge biological findings on *******uality in animals, claiming its "gay activist's opinion"

Then basically make up your own definition of *******uality and want me to accept it yet when you dont accept scientific findings