Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A law in San Francisco that legalizes shoplifting up to $950 has caused the closure of stores all across downtown

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    A law in San Francisco that legalizes shoplifting up to $950 has caused the closure of stores all across downtown

    A law in San Francisco that legalizes shoplifting of up to $950 worth of goods has caused the closure of stores all across downtown because of the massive loss they have suffered to shoplifters.

    In their “wisdom,” the City Council passed Prop 47, an ordinance that prevents police officers from arresting or even stopping anyone who steals less than $950 worth of goods.

    Unsurprisingly, the new city law spurred the growth of organized gangs of thieves who gather together and run into a store as a group to grab everything they can carry knowing full well that neither the police, nor the store owners, can do a thing to stop them.

    Now, stores such as Walgreens, CVS, and convenience store chains, are closing dozens of locations in the city because their product loss rate has climbed more than 100 percent.

    Walgreens, for one, has closed 17 locations in the last few years — approaching half of its San Francisco outlets. And CVS is also closing locations.

    CVS supervisor Ahsha Safaí recently told the that the theft is completely out of control and local residents are afraid to even enter the store because of the gangs roaming the aisles.

    “This has been uncontrolled,” Safaí said. “Individuals are scared to enter these shops — seniors, folks with disabilities, kids. It’s simply taking place overtly. We are able to’t simply as a metropolis throw up our arms and say that is OK. We now have to provide you with options.”

    CVS also revealed just how lopsided the theft is in the city: “At CVS, 42% of losses within the Bay Space got here from 12 shops in San Francisco, that are solely 8% of the market share, Brendan Dugan, director of organized retail crime and company investigations, stated on the listening to.”

    This hits vulnerable elderly residents the most, the media notes. After all, these stores are also pharmacies and when these locations close, so do their pharmacies. This leaves elderly patients unable to get their life-saving prescriptions filled.

    It also hurts people who don’t have cars because instead of being able to walk down to the corner store, they now have to travel several miles to find a place to shop.

    Once again, we see that ********s care more about criminals than they do the taxpayers and the average citizen.

    #2
    So now shoplifters have to wait for items priced at $999.00 to go on sale.
    Last edited by jaded; 05-18-2021, 09:55 PM.

    Comment


      #3
      Newsom is releasing another 74k inmates. And yeah its not ok to steal and its still a crime but its cite and release knowing these junkies wont show to court. Its been like this for a long time now.

      Comment


        #4
        No way


        Comment


          #5
          This has been a ****** law in San Fran for a while now I believe, but I’m sure with the pandemic it’s only gotten worse

          Comment


            #6
            ******** way EVERYTHING FREE!!!
            Fists_of_Fury Fists_of_Fury likes this.

            Comment


              #7
              I read something about this a while back and did a little bit of digging, apparently they do it a few places too like Dallas ($750 limit) and they had a kinda guideline here in the UK up to £200 which was abandoned after an outcry from shop owners. I think the general idea is that it costs more to prosecute that kinda shet plus they're unlikely to get a conviction and even if they did the cost of either pursuing non payment of fines or a custodial sentence is unsustainable.... more a question of economics, daft as it sounds States, or more particularly municipal governments simply ain't got the resources. Given some of the stuff they do find money for however I ain't surprised some folk are upset...

              I understand that there can be circumstances where leniency should reasonably be applied or at least some mitigation considered, such as in cases of existential need (stealing a loaf of bread to feed your kids for instance), but surely these should be discretionary and down to the judgement of individual enforcement officers or the mercy of the victim?


              EDIT: Although actually the article in the OP is innacurate in a number of ways... Proposition 47 does not legalise theft it merely recategorises certain types of theft and drug offenses as misdemeanors, carrying fines and and up to 6 months in county jail (12 months for some possession offenses)

              Shoplifting. The proposition added Penal Code section 459.5 to create a new misdemeanor offense called "shoplifting," punishable by up to 6 months in county jail. Shoplifting would be defined as "entering a commercial establishment with intent to commit larceny while that establishment is open during regular business hours" where the value of the property does not exceed $950. Any other entry into a commercial establishment with intent to commit larceny is burglary. Any act of shoplifting as defined above must be charged as shoplifting. No person charged with shoplifting may also be charged with burglary or theft of the same property.
              Petty Theft. Proposition 47 added Penal Code section 490.2 to expressly define petty theft as “obtaining any property by theft where the value of the money, labor, real or personal property taken” does not exceed $950. This new definition of petty theft applies notwithstanding Section 487 “or any other provision of law defining grand theft.” (Pen. Code, § 490.2(a).) As such, the new definition of petty theft appears to apply regardless of how specific categories of property are treated under separate statutes. This new provision is not applicable to any theft that may be charged as an infraction “pursuant to any other provision of law.”
              Also it does not prevent officers from arresting or stopping people who commit such crimes.
              Prop. 47 maintains law enforcement’s ability to arrest and detain people for misdemeanors (and jail them for up to one year, if convicted), if they believe that is necessary for public safety






              billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

              Comment


                #8
                As someone who lives here... You do not go downtown if given a choice.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Dayuuum I need to get a bus full of hunters point brothers together and go shopping in Union Square SF.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Keep the stuff behind the counter and let them ask for it?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP