Football Soccer Football Soccer Football Soccer

[The Tase]

Need I go on?

If anyone should be campaigning for penalties to go it's an English person. But the system works.

i would like to see a full analytics research and see whether offense or defense gets the upper hand on PK. which side dominates more on penalty kicks.

from my observation pks seem heavily weighted on the offensive side.

id like to see the raw data. if its pretty even both sides, sure keep it as is. but to me it seems offense would have the raw numbers on their side despite what your 4 youtube videos showed.

[New England]

84.5 Overtime – Playoffs – In the Stanley Cup Playoffs, when a game is tied after three (3) twenty (20) minute regular periods of play, the teams shall take a normal intermission (fifteen (15) minutes) and resume playing twenty (20) minute periods, changing ends for the start of each overtime period. The team scoring the first goal in overtime shall be declared the winner of the game.

[Mr Ehrmantraut]

you probably didn't even read the post, and are just upset about getting railed in the bringer thread.

The poll in that thread speaks for itself, get your tongue out of Bringers ass.

Your suggestion of 90 minutes extra time is cringeworthy and honestly very embarrassing.

[jas]

i would like to see a full analytics research and see whether offense or defense gets the upper hand on PK. which side dominates more on penalty kicks.

from my observation pks seem heavily weighted on the offensive side.

id like to see the raw data. if its pretty even both sides, sure keep it as is. but to me it seems offense would have the raw numbers on their side despite what your 4 youtube videos showed.

Obviously the ratio is going to be in favour of penalties scored...........

[El Fenomeno]

This is the first time I've ever seen people moaning about games being decided on penalties.

Classic case of 'if it ain't broke'.

[El Fenomeno]

yes there is. there are infinite 20 minute periods of overtime in every round of the playoffs.

If they played an infinite amount of extra time in football then you'd have instances where whichever team got through to the next round would be physically too exhausted to actually play properly in the next game. It isn't feasible.

Hockey is much more frequent in scoring, thus you can get away with unlimited overtime as there's much more chance of a game ending goal. With football you could literally go on for hours and hours.

i would like to see a full analytics research and see whether offense or defense gets the upper hand on PK. which side dominates more on penalty kicks.

from my observation pks seem heavily weighted on the offensive side.

id like to see the raw data. if its pretty even both sides, sure keep it as is. but to me it seems offense would have the raw numbers on their side despite what your 4 youtube videos showed.

What's the problem with the offensive team getting an advantage? It's the same for both teams!

If only 1 team was taking the pens then maybe you'd have a point.

[jas]

When trolling just makes you look ******......

[Krewella Boyy]

A penalty shootout is the greatest thing ever. As long as the team you support isn't involved in it.

[New England]

If they played an infinite amount of extra time in football then you'd have instances where whichever team got through to the next round would be physically too exhausted to actually play properly in the next game. It isn't feasible.

Hockey is much more frequent in scoring, thus you can get away with unlimited overtime as there's much more chance of a game ending goal. With football you could literally go on for hours and hours.



What's the problem with the offensive team getting an advantage? It's the same for both teams!

If only 1 team was taking the pens then maybe you'd have a point.

it is absolutely "feasible" to play more than 30 minutes of extra time. it says a lot about your athletes if it isn't.


i'd also look into the possiblities with changes to substitution rules, and call for a cut off after a certain amount of extra time.


they'd play at elast an extra 90 minutes under my american rule. i'm starting to like the sound of a 30 minute running period. i may just make them run those until somebody drops dead.

keep in mind that our country is the most athletically accomplished nation of all time, and an american is talking. you really ought to at least think about hearing me out. americans know sport. it's muscle memory.

[The Tase]

Obviously the ratio is going to be in favour of penalties scored...........

still id like to see an analytics based report on pk. they can brake it down to whether or not which side dominates pks.

This is the first time I've ever seen people moaning about games being decided on penalties.

Classic case of 'if it ain't broke'.

If they played an infinite amount of extra time in football then you'd have instances where whichever team got through to the next round would be physically too exhausted to actually play properly in the next game. It isn't feasible.

Hockey is much more frequent in scoring, thus you can get away with unlimited overtime as there's much more chance of a game ending goal. With football you could literally go on for hours and hours.



What's the problem with the offensive team getting an advantage? It's the same for both teams!

If only 1 team was taking the pens then maybe you'd have a point.

i love penalty kicks. i disagree completely with new england on this. still
i think moving the ball back a little bit would balance out penalty shootouts.

futbol isnt above making minor tweaks to improve and evolve the game for the better.