Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
View Post
Lomachenko is pretty much the fix to Boxing's ills.
For decades we had fighters avoiding everyone but the absolute worst opponents. Look at the careers of Jones and Mayweather. That sold VERY WELL with a certain demographic, but most of the world was turned off to Boxing.
Finally, in Lomachenko we have a fighter who hunts down the best challenges. He could have easily drained down to 118, 122, and picked up hopelessly outmatched scalps there. But he started at 126, and still agreed to fight an opponent who purposely came in well-above the limit. He also didn't run across the ring (like Floyd did when Judah hurt him with a body shot) whenever he took bona fide low blow. Hell, he almost STOPPED the rat - something FLoyd couldn't say in his fights with Corrales, Maidana, De La Hoya, and Pacquiao. And that was what he complained about - not the fouling he suffered, but his own failure to step on the gas sooner in the fight. A true man.
The fight with Lopez was close. I don't consider it a robbery, per se: Lomachenko as the Champion should be favored in such close decisions, though that's not a rule; and two of the scorecards were clear indications of either incompetence of bribery. But at least Loma took the fight. WOuld FLoyd have taken that fight? NO!!! And you know if he was forced into it all sorts of hoops would have been put in place to trip up LOpez. Lopez looked like a monster against LOmachenko in there. And the size disparity clearly had an impact on the outcome of the fight, as much as Lomachenko's lack of urgency early in the fight.
There's nothing wrong with defending Lomachenko is what were basically throw away losses.
Comment