Originally posted by PAC-BOY
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd's Illegal IV; A Prefight Ritual Or A One-Time Thing?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by PAC-BOY View PostHe perform an IV when it was not allowed and also did it on the privacy of his own home in which was not allowed. NSAC rules were broken.
Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed to additional restrictions that weren't required by Nevada.
One of the additional restrictions they voluntarily agreed to was that any use of IV would have to be for legitimate medical reasons.
The protocol for determining if the use of an IV is for legitimate medical reasons is to either request an exemption in advance if it's an expected ailment that needs to be treated in the future, or to request a retroactive exemption if it's an unexpected ailment that needed treatment quicker than it takes to get a TUE.
So now only did Floyd follow all Nevada rules, he also followed the additional restrictions he and Manny voluntarily agreed to. Nevada and USADA have both confirmed Floyd did nothing wrong. What more do you want?
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostYou're wrong. No Nevada rules were broken. IVs were allowed in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason.
Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed to additional restrictions that weren't required by Nevada.
One of the additional restrictions they voluntarily agreed to was that any use of IV would have to be for legitimate medical reasons.
The protocol for determining if the use of an IV is for legitimate medical reasons is to either request an exemption in advance if it's an expected ailment that needs to be treated in the future, or to request a retroactive exemption if it's an unexpected ailment that needed treatment quicker than it takes to get a TUE.
So now only did Floyd follow all Nevada rules, he also followed the additional restrictions he and Manny voluntarily agreed to. Nevada and USADA have both confirmed Floyd did nothing wrong. What more do you want?
Poor Pac had to have his arm stapled back on to prepare to fight floyd.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostYou're wrong. No Nevada rules were broken. IVs were allowed in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason.
Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed to additional restrictions that weren't required by Nevada.
One of the additional restrictions they voluntarily agreed to was that any use of IV would have to be for legitimate medical reasons.
The protocol for determining if the use of an IV is for legitimate medical reasons is to either request an exemption in advance if it's an expected ailment that needs to be treated in the future, or to request a retroactive exemption if it's an unexpected ailment that needed treatment quicker than it takes to get a TUE.
So now only did Floyd follow all Nevada rules, he also followed the additional restrictions he and Manny voluntarily agreed to. Nevada and USADA have both confirmed Floyd did nothing wrong. What more do you want?
Although the substances contained in the IV were not banned by WADA, whose standards USADA says it follows, the fact that they were given intravenously was not allowed.
The TUE for Mayweather's IV -- and the IV was administered at Floyd's house, not in a medical facility, and wasn't brought to our attention at the time -- was totally unacceptable," Bennett is quoted as saying in the report. "I've made it clear to [USADA CEO] Travis Tygart that this should not happen again. We have the sole authority to grant any and all TUEs in the state of Nevada. USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions. Not in this state. We are less than pleased that USADA acted the way it did." -Nevada State Athletic Commission executive director Bob Bennett
Comment
-
Originally posted by PAC-BOY View PostAlthough the substances contained in the IV were not banned by WADA, whose standards USADA says it follows,[B] the fact that they were given intravenously was not allowed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostNot allowed unless USADA ruled it was for legitimate medical reasons and USADA ruled it was for legitimate medical reasons. Therefore it was allowed. You guys are so ****ing ****** it's unbelievable.
If it was used as a legitimate medical reason it was still done in the home by MAYWEATERS MEDICAL TEAM...Not a qualified medical staff in a medical facility....which was unacceptable along with the USADA giving a fighter an exemption in the state of Nevada. And also before they even informed the ***ing commission lol .
You're siding with the USADA because they are protecting themselves and Floyd. I get it. And youre making yourself look ****** for doing so. You're honestly not a bad poster i dont know why youre not seeing this.
I am siding with the Commission Well because its their Sate their rules and they say it was done wrong. THE END. Hell thats all i need to know. And I dont care who the fighter is. Its a done deal when the the President of the NSAC says it was done wrong.
Thats the bottom line facts. NSAC says so. Im done no need to debate that fact any longer. I dont care what USADA says! You do. But they aint Las Vegas Nevada!Last edited by PAC-BOY; 01-20-2020, 01:06 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PAC-BOY View PostDude you are the idiot here. You are taking the word of the agency that was wrong and is covering up their shlt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostUSADA was hired to determine if USADA approved. USADA approved. How can USADA be wrong about whether USADA approved? Think about how ****** you sound here.
Just rewind and look back. Nothing else to say. NSAC says it was done wrong. THE END
Its the commissions rule. They even settled that it was done wrong. Its a non arguable situation. USADA claims they did everything right. OF COURSE. Its what you do to keep your reputation. Its damage control. Even NSAC knows that. And they were warned in Nevada. Luckily the agents in the IV were not illegal, but how they were given and where they were given and how much was given was NOT in compliance with the NEVADA STATE ATHLETIC COMMISSION
Comment
Comment