Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Expects Golovkin To Stake Title, Despite Canelo's Beef

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by original zero View Post
    hahaha you're such an idiot dude. the WBC has done that for years. if there's no mandatory already and there's a huge fight, they'll count it as a mandatory to reset the clock. over and over you prove that you either started following boxing yesterday, or never pay attention to what's really going on.




    and they counted it as a mandatory to reset the clock for the winner. the WBC rules clearly state the WBC can do whatever the **** they want whenever they want as long as they deem it in the best interest of boxing.

    i'm sorry they don't call you about every decision that they make.
    The clock started 1 year after their fight regardless you phuking idiot and nobody has a beef with them allowing a unification fight. Everyone had a problem with letting floyd remain world champ at a weight class without having to face a mandatory or actually fight at that weight and still nothing you have shown says the WBC ever made Canelo the mandatory after the fight and out their own mouths they said they the opposite they didn't make a mandatory specifically for Floyd already breaks their own rules of needing of having to face a mandatory challenger within 12 months of winning the title. Let alone not stripping him because he was fighting exclusively in another weight class. Not only did floyd not do that they didn't even name a mandatory and then made a mockery by sanctioning a welterweight championship fight with the 154 belt on the line something that has NEVER happened in the history of the Jr Middleweight title let alone go 2 full years without naming a mandatory challenger something that also has never happened.

    Go suck more Haymon dyck after all the denial and proving you wrong you finally just fall back on well WBC has a clause that says they can do whatever they want anyway. You should of led with that then make up lies only to look ****** when you arrive at the same road as I said from jump they broke their own phuking rules because they corrupt and they are in Haymon's pockets.
    Last edited by bigdunny1; 05-30-2017, 06:18 PM.

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
      The clock started 1 year after their fight regardless you phuking idiot and nobody has a beef with them allowing a unification fight. Everyone had a problem with letting floyd remain world champ at a weight class without having to face a mandatory
      The WBC rankings are publicly available from that time. Canelo was #1. Canelo was not enforced as a mandatory because Canelo didn't want to be enforced as a mandatory. Period.

      Please show us one public comment from Canelo or his team asking for the Mayweather rematch to be ordered. You can't. The WBC had no mandatory to enforce because the #1 ranked fighter wanted to wait.

      Nobody would have gained anything by calling Canelo out publicly for wanting to take his time. But you can't act like Mayweather was avoiding facing the top fighter when the top fighter didn't want to face him.

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by original zero View Post
        The WBC rankings are publicly available from that time. Canelo was #1. Canelo was not enforced as a mandatory because Canelo didn't want to be enforced as a mandatory. Period.

        Please show us one public comment from Canelo or his team asking for the Mayweather rematch to be ordered. You can't. The WBC had no mandatory to enforce because the #1 ranked fighter wanted to wait.

        Nobody would have gained anything by calling Canelo out publicly for wanting to take his time. But you can't act like Mayweather was avoiding facing the top fighter when the top fighter didn't want to face him.
        again stop lying that's not how it works. Their rankings wasn't the issue them refusing to create a mandatory challenger or strip a fighter who was fighting in another weight class is the issue. WBC decides the mandatory and they refused to create one first lie Canelo wasn't the mandatory because one didn't exist and they admitted they did this only for Floyd. Second even if they did and canelo chose not to accept the fight their rules state he has X amount of time do decide or they move to the next fighter who gets the mandatory spot. Fighters turn down title shots all the time because of injury or they want other fights and they move on to the next guy on the list you don't just REFUSE to create a mandatory because one guy passes on the opportunity you phuking lying haymon dyck rider. That breaks WBC protocol and it's listed on their own website. You keep saying this is normal when it's not. Stop putting canelo in the middle of the BS that went on with the WBC and Haymon you re tard. WBC never mentioned him because he had nothing to do with their decision. WBC taking money from Haymon and their corruption is the ONLY reason he was allowed to keep a 154 title that he won at catchweight and then go back to welterweight for 2 straight years without being stripped. And they didn't even try to hide it breaking their own rules by not enforcing or even creating a mandatory challenger.
        Last edited by bigdunny1; 05-30-2017, 06:37 PM.

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
          stop phuk boy if canelo didn't want to fight him again then by their rules they move down to the next ranked fighter and he becomes the mandatory. Floyd refused to fight Canelo at 154 the first time but you telling me had the WBC demanded a rematch at 154 he was just going to say sure ok? Floyd wasn't fighting ANYONE at 154 period. And the WBC had to release numerous statements on this fiasco and NEVER once said it was because of canelo. You pulling shyt out your azz. They broke their own rules to NEVER create a mandatory so that they didn't have to go through the akward situation of Floyd either vacating the belt or them being forced to strip him. So to get around him never making a mandatory defense they REFUSE to ever create one and enforce one allowing him to continue fighting for YEARS in welterweight fights while keeping a Jr Middleweight title. You are wrong take your L and sit the phuk down. WBC is corrupt and were being paid by Floyd and Haymon to look the other way.
          They weren't being paid off like you suggest, Floyd made so much more off his acclaim so their fees could be higher. Business decision for them, more WBC being compromised than Floyd needing to pay them off. Same as they did with canelo and this play Chavez belt

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
            again stop lying that's not how it works.
            hahahhaa you're gonna tell ME how the WBC works when you've been consistently wrong over and over in this thread and i speak to the WBC on an almost daily basis?

            laughable.

            the WBC has ALWAYS allowed things to drag on when the #1 ranked fighter isn't in a rush to get his title shot. this is nothing new.

            the WBC has ALWAYS been the most flexible with step aside fees. the WBC has ALWAYS been the most flexible with allowing big stars additional time to make mandatories and the WBC has ALWAYS been the most flexible with allowing #1 ranked fighters to take their time if they so choose.

            for instance, when wilder was trying to fight povetkin, povetkin decided he didn't want his title shot yet, wanted another tune up, and wanted his title shot to take place the next year instead. in the IBF, he would have been automatically kicked out of the rankings for doing this. but in the WBC, #1 ranked fighters are allowed to take their time if they wish.

            which is exactly what canelo did.

            and you have no evidence to the contrary.

            we all know you're a big dummy but just in case there is anybody new here, i don't want them to get confused by your nonsense.

            you have no idea how the sanctioning bodies work and you have no idea how the industry operates. you're a half ******ed fan on a message board with no experience and no knowledge. you post from your mom's basement with pimples on your face and you couldn't get laid if your life depended on it.

            who do you think you're fooling?

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by TheUptownKid View Post
              They weren't being paid off like you suggest, Floyd made so much more off his acclaim so their fees could be higher. Business decision for them, more WBC being compromised than Floyd needing to pay them off. Same as they did with canelo and this play Chavez belt
              that's semantics whether they said here I will pay you money don't strip us or WBC decided to break rules to get money without having the conversation it's still corruption. And you only have to look at the long list of Haymon WBC champs and the shady circumstances a lot of them got the title to the opponents the WBC has mandated to see the alliance and corruption between the 2. But again WBC literally broke every single rule they have in place just for Floyd to keep that belt until he retired.

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by original zero View Post
                hahahhaa you're gonna tell ME how the WBC works when you've been consistently wrong over and over in this thread and i speak to the WBC on an almost daily basis?

                laughable.

                the WBC has ALWAYS allowed things to drag on when the #1 ranked fighter isn't in a rush to get his title shot. this is nothing new.

                the WBC has ALWAYS been the most flexible with step aside fees. the WBC has ALWAYS been the most flexible with allowing big stars additional time to make mandatories and the WBC has ALWAYS been the most flexible with allowing #1 ranked fighters to take their time if they so choose.

                for instance, when wilder was trying to fight povetkin, povetkin decided he didn't want his title shot yet, wanted another tune up, and wanted his title shot to take place the next year instead. in the IBF, he would have been automatically kicked out of the rankings for doing this. but in the WBC, #1 ranked fighters are allowed to take their time if they wish.

                which is exactly what canelo did.

                and you have no evidence to the contrary.

                we all know you're a big dummy but just in case there is anybody new here, i don't want them to get confused by your nonsense.

                you have no idea how the sanctioning bodies work and you have no idea how the industry operates. you're a half ******ed fan on a message board with no experience and no knowledge. you post from your mom's basement with pimples on your face and you couldn't get laid if your life depended on it.

                who do you think you're fooling?
                again why you lying what they did has literally never happened. We not talking about step aside fee after a mandatory challenger has already been named. We not talking about extending when you have to face that already named mandatory challenger because a champ is injured or exercising a unification fight. NONE of that occurred they simple refused to name a mandatory for one fighter and then let that go for 2 years while he was NOT strictly in another weight class and then sanctioned that 154 belt be on the line for a welterweight championship fight. Go ahead phuk boy name a single other time this happened you won't be able to because it don't exist. The closest thing you will find is Sugar Ray Leonard who retired then came back when he fought Lalonde which was controversial at the time and never happened before or since.

                MOST flexable is code for most corrupt. And laughing at you trying to move the goal posts bringing up step aside fee and other examples that have nothing to do with what the WBC did with Floyd.
                Last edited by bigdunny1; 05-30-2017, 06:53 PM.

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
                  And you only have to look at the long list of Haymon WBC champs and the shady circumstances a lot of them got the title to the opponents the WBC has mandated to see the alliance and corruption between the 2.
                  Haymon also has lots of WBA and IBF champions as well. Which makes sense considering Haymon has the best stable in boxing, managing hundreds of fighters for lots of different promoters.

                  Meanwhile, Arum has THE MAJORITY OF WBO CHAMPIONS IN THE WORLD.

                  Take out the tiny tiny weight classes dominated by Asia and Arum has almost every WBO champion period.

                  So where is the real corruption? After all, the WBO was founded by the man Arum publicly confirmed as the leader of the WBA's bribery operation. When the WBA got rid of him over the scandal (the scandal Arum exposed), he started the WBO (which Arum nearly exclusively supports).

                  So where is the real corruption? The WBC, which has never had a bribery scandal in its history, or the WBO, which was founded by the #1 bribery mogul in the history of boxing?!?

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
                    again why you lying what they did has literally never happened.
                    just gave you a recent example of it happening. you just don't like the example so now you're moving the goal posts. mayweather defended both titles. he didn't have a 154 pound mandatory because the 154 pound #1 didn't want a title shot yet. period. end of story.

                    it's not my fault you have no idea how this sport works. the WBC won't order a mandatory defense against a fighter who doesn't want a title shot yet.

                    canelo could have demanded a title shot, he didn't. he didn't because he had been recently embarrassed by mayweather and didn't want a rematch anytime soon.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by original zero View Post
                      Haymon also has lots of WBA and IBF champions as well. Which makes sense considering Haymon has the best stable in boxing, managing hundreds of fighters for lots of different promoters.

                      Meanwhile, Arum has THE MAJORITY OF WBO CHAMPIONS IN THE WORLD.

                      Take out the tiny tiny weight classes dominated by Asia and Arum has almost every WBO champion period.

                      So where is the real corruption? After all, the WBO was founded by the man Arum publicly confirmed as the leader of the WBA's bribery operation. When the WBA got rid of him over the scandal (the scandal Arum exposed), he started the WBO (which Arum nearly exclusively supports).

                      So where is the real corruption? The WBC, which has never had a bribery scandal in its history, or the WBO, which was founded by the #1 bribery mogul in the history of boxing?!?
                      Everyone sees what is going on with the WBC and Haymon fighters and unlike you I have no problem acknowledging what is going on with the WBO and top rank. But the WBC lets floyd go 2 years fighting at welterweight and still holding the 154 title and they don't even hid the corruption by refusing to ever name a mandatory challenger during that stretch and you still play ****** and make up lies for why this occurred. At least the WBC get's paid to pretend nothing exists with Haymon but you sucking his dyck everyday not getting a dime

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP