Originally posted by Pigeons
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Povetkin's Promoter: Trace of Meldonium Was Just 70 Nanograms
Collapse
-
Originally posted by JRB123 View Post1 microgram is considered as positive...the promoter says that Povetkin had been shown to have 7 nanograms in his system, which is .07 micrograms. If that's the case, then the fight is still on, and it should be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostThe definition for several is - "more than two but not many".
It took 7-8 months from the time Pov took it to the time he popped positive. 7-8 is not several.
Comment
-
Povetkin's team say he stopped taking meldonium last September, before it was officially added to the WADA banned substances list January this year. But the claim doesn't stand up because VADA's records show Povetkin tested negative for any banned substances on April 7, 8, and 11, before testing positive for meldonium on April 27th.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PunchyPotorff View Post7-8 isn't several? Plz advise which reference book or url you used to come up with that.
The definitition of several is more than 2-3, but not many.
Either way, it doesn't really matter because somehow Pov found a way to pass 3 tests before failing the 4th, but had the stuff in his system since September?
Comment
-
This from ИATAS bears re-posting:
Baby Blimp Dan Rafael tweeting this below is kinda bogus. He's assuming a lot...
"Povetkin was negative in VADA tests on 4/7, 4/8, 4/11. Positive on 4/27. Story that substance in system was from 2015 before ban is fantasy."
Especially if by 'positive' he's referring to the .07 test... since from what I read the limit is 1.0. Unless my math is wacko, .07 is less than 1/10th the limit.
This issue is generating a bunch of confusing info, none of which seems to be more than smoke and mirrors at this stage IMO. You're either within guidelines or you aren't. And it looks like Povetkin is within guidelines... so why did Rafael even 'break' a non-story?
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by PunchyPotorff View PostThis from ИATAS bears re-posting:
Baby Blimp Dan Rafael tweeting this below is kinda bogus. He's assuming a lot...
"Povetkin was negative in VADA tests on 4/7, 4/8, 4/11. Positive on 4/27. Story that substance in system was from 2015 before ban is fantasy."
Especially if by 'positive' he's referring to the .07 test... since from what I read the limit is 1.0. Unless my math is wacko, .07 is less than 1/10th the limit.
This issue is generating a bunch of confusing info, none of which seems to be more than smoke and mirrors at this stage IMO. You're either within guidelines or you aren't. And it looks like Povetkin is within guidelines... so why did Rafael even 'break' a non-story?
Comment
Comment