This kills Hauser's article. Guess you shouldn't create an article based of adding fictional details to known info from 4 months ago.
Kills his article Floyd is so adement about usada and its " random testing " yet they clearly stated they don't conduct random testing lmao if anything it contradicts everything Floyd has been shouting about blah ha ha ha !!
All of a sudden there was a doctor on site now yet several weeks ago they had no idea that the IV was being administered .. I have read it all
why wouldnt they defend theirselves? give me a break they are not lying about any of this that wouldnt make sense maybe u guys have been hoodwinked by someone vada pay roll and hauser who ahs worked for multiple places sponsored by top rank. how about taking emotion out of it and realize the article was bs
How could NSAC have cleared Floyd for an IV if they found out 3 weeks AFTER the fight?
the minute the fighter signed their drug tested contract with usada, it allowed the TUE to be placed into overiding NSAC policy, its messed up, but bc the fighters agreed to third party testing, it pretty much limited NSAC power. as far as the IV they listed when they made it aware and this rule next is what counter hauser:
If a non-prohibited substance is infused or
injected without a concurrent hospital
admission, surgical procedure or clinical
investigation; a TUE must be submitted
for this Prohibited Method if more than 50 mL of fluid per a 6-hour period is
infused or injected.
key word being submitted...which means as long as they put in the intent and paper work, it could be administered and then be accepted and approved later. hence kevin iole reporting it on may 22 when all the drug testing details came out.
Kills his article Floyd is so adement about usada and its " random testing " yet they clearly stated they don't conduct random testing lmao if anything it contradicts everything Floyd has been shouting about blah ha ha ha !!
Damage control. Reputation is the cornerstone of power. Protect your reputation at all costs
Wtf. So basically you think if someone accuses anyone of anything that means their guilty & have no recourse to counter the argument without it just being about damage control instead of their details of what happened since they were the ones there? Hauser wasn't in the room. The USADA was. Yet somehow Hauser knows the truth & the USADA doesn't? **** man based on their history I trust the USADA to be less agenda driven than Hauser.
u cannot do that..opening up medical records to thousands of athletes..thats wat this would result in...i kno this is extreme, but could surely be the case...if one has aid/hiv or something terrible now that is disclosed in public record and more lawsuits are coming..medical records are iffy...not many instances where your doctor patient priv is revoked bro
You don't think this is idiotic in this kind of business where the other fighter has no way of contesting the results? Don't even know why they have this confidentiality agreement in an environment where cheaters are supposed to be exposed, and not protected. This is like providing safe havens to criminals.
Who wants to bet USADA doesnt take the steps to sue Hauser. You would think if Hauser was spreading nothing but lies and inaccuracies, they would surely sue him for defamation as it causes serious damage to the integrity of USADA. Problem is, if they were to sue it would require them to release all the testing records and I highly doubt they want to do that. We saw how fast Floyd settled when TR lawyers subpeonad Floyd's team to disclose all his testing records.
Comment