Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[cortdawg25]

It's obvious NSAC can't get their story straight either.

Haha...how is that crow?

[ADP02]

Again you are speculating. Someone could argue the same nonsense about Pacquiao or the huge number of professional boxers that don't even volunteer and pay for random drug testing. Without concrete evidence, you are only stating an opinion. An opinion which means nothing and changes nothing.

Even PED experts like Victor Conte don't even take your stance. And instead believe Mayweather is doing something else entirely if he is indeed using PEDs.

Show me all the posts that you and other Floyd fans made over the years that state that it was nonsense that Manny was on PEDs vs those Floyd fans that were convinced that Manny was on PEDs with almost nothing to go on? and less info than we have here for Floyd.


Sorry but the information that is out there points to Floyd doing something to get an advantage that he should not have received. That was the whole point of these tests, remember? At the end it was Floyd that ended up getting the advantage while Manny was refused.



The commissions had denied Manny but were OK with Floyd getting an advantage and you think this is all acceptable. :

Aguilar denied it (for Manny), saying the commission had no previous indication there was an injury and couldnt allow a shot in fairness to the Mayweather camp.

The commissions had no previous indications on Floyd's so called injury that required medical help and an IV after the weigh in. Yet, all is good in Vegas!!!


.

[ADP02]

Why won't the media report our 6 conspiracy theories glued together as a fact?

"Don't believe in conspiracies? Lance Armstrong was ringleader of biggest doping conspiracy in sporting history"

Just like Floyd, Lance delayed testing, took saline type solution to mask, .......

[radioraheem]

Show me all the posts that you and other Floyd fans made over the years that state that it was nonsense that Manny was on PEDs vs those Floyd fans that were convinced that Manny was on PEDs with almost nothing to go on? and less info than we have here for Floyd.

Sorry but the information that is out there points to Floyd doing something to get an advantage that he should not have received. That was the whole point of these tests, remember? At the end it was Floyd that ended up getting the advantage while Manny was refused.

The commissions had denied Manny but were OK with Floyd getting an advantage and you think this is all acceptable. :

Aguilar denied it (for Manny), saying the commission had no previous indication there was an injury and couldnt allow a shot in fairness to the Mayweather camp.

The commissions had no previous indications on Floyd's so called injury that required medical help and an IV after the weigh in. Yet, all is good in Vegas!!!

.

Sorry, but you have no proof that Floyd Mayweather is indeed on PEDS. That is a fact. All you have is pure speculation.

I have stated in the past, and just now, that without factual evidence, all anyone has is nothing but speculation. I can be of the opinion that Marquez was on PEDs during Marquez vs. Pacquiao 4, but there is no proof that Marquez was on PEDs. So I'm doing nothing more than speculating. Similarly, some are of the opinion that unless the boxer is doing random drug testing year round, than they are dirty. But that too is speculation, not fact.

[hardvibes]

^ And the "floydism" goes on. I can't believe it. These people will never open their eyes.

[ADP02]

Sorry, but you have no proof that Floyd Mayweather is indeed on PEDS. That is a fact. All you have is pure speculation.

I have stated in the past, and just now, that without factual evidence, all anyone has is nothing but speculation. I can be of the opinion that Marquez was on PEDs during Marquez vs. Pacquiao 4, but there is no proof that Marquez was on PEDs. So I'm doing nothing more than speculating. Similarly, some are of the opinion that unless the boxer is doing random drug testing year round, than they are dirty. But that too is speculation, not fact.

There are a lot of circumstances that point to Floyd doing it. Follow Lance Armstrong's case as an example then see what Floyd did. Very similar.

Those circumstances is enough to formulate a credible case against Floyd. We know that you do not want to go there but again, its at this point much more than speculation. They are facts that have been admitted to. There is no way that Floyd should have been allowed to get that IV after the weigh in but he did.

The commission said themselves about Manny that they can't approve because it was too late in the game for a request even though they were non-prohibited in nature and even though they were told BEFORE the fight. Floyd by-passed that step altogether. So to say, the commissions were not aware nor did they approve BEFORE the fight.

So by their own statements, Floyd did something against what the commissions expect. That is, unless there are 2 standards. One for Manny and a different, special one for the Vegas hometown guy named Floyd.

[b00g13man]

So you have 2 different stories coming from the NSAC. Which is accurate and why did they change their tune?

You're the one who brought up the NSAC's comments into it. Why did you choose to believe one story, and not the other?

It's in the Nevada rules.



PROHIBITED ACTS;

NAC 467.850; Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)
1.The administration of or use of any:
(a)Alcohol
(b)Stimulant; or
(c)Drug or injection that has not been approved by the Commission

It doesn't say say saline use is unapproved anywhere. Are you reading that as "needing to get explicit approval before using x", because that isn't what it is.

[Rath]

The head of NSAC said he did nothing wrong and the case was CLOSED

you never trusted NSAC before, remember when Pac said let NSAC do it's job?

what gives now?

[Rath]

Arum and Pacquiao knew about this since May, yet it wasnt worth their time to discuss. It never became a thing until that phaggot hauser made a big deal about it.

there was a confidentiality clause on the contract

[Rath]

NSAC doesnt have to issue an exemption for the IV, since it wasnt in violation of their rules in the first place. It was against USADA/WADA rules, so how would they grant an exception for someone elses rules?


NSAC makes no sense here.

If NSAC make no sense how come Mr. Larry XXX used NSAC to vindicate floyd did nothing wrong?