Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[Rath]

So I guess that means no!

Belief only when conveniently fits your nonsensical agenda.

you believe bennets interview a week later but not his first so would you call that a nonsisical agenda?

[GTTofAK]

So I guess that means no!

Belief only when conveniently fits your nonsensical agenda.

Nope you are just ******. I'm actually sorry for you.

[radioraheem]

Nope you are just ******. I'm actually sorry for you.

I'm actually sorry for you, because you do such a great job at owning yourself. You can't even help it.

[ADP02]

The NSAC were cool with Lance? I had no idea. USADA also just decided to do a 180, and go all out to bring him down? Yeah, right. Use your brain sometimes.

When I said they were fine, I meant that when Floyd, I mean Lance, was rumored to be on PEDs, the officials said he passed all his tests and did nothing wrong.

Lance said that he had nothing to hide and it was all HARD WORK.


Sound familiar?

[GTTofAK]

It's in the Nevada rules.



PROHIBITED ACTS;

NAC 467.850; Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)
1.The administration of or use of any:
(a)Alcohol
(b)Stimulant; or
(c)Drug or injection that has not been approved by the Commission

Good find also noticed that they they tell the reader to refer WADA for further information so the NASC admits that they follow WADA protocols.

[GTTofAK]

When I said they were fine, I meant that when Floyd, I mean Lance, was rumored to be on PEDs, the officials said he passed all his tests and did nothing wrong.

Lance said that he had nothing to hide and it was all HARD WORK.

And USADA did nothing until someone outside of the organization, in the case of Armstrong the LA federal prosecutor, did their own investigation.

[-Hyperion-]

Because boxing is corrupted in every level. If you're being objective, you know the IV deal is fishy, and merited at least more hard questioning to everyone involved, especially USADA, Mayweather and NSAC. USADA dealing with private contracts directly with the fighters or the promoters is such a big conflict of interest. The contract of the Pacquiao-Mayweather negotiations is proof(retroactive unjustified TUE's planned ahead of time). Remember when Richard Schaefer *****ed about VADA telling only Peterson about the failed A sample, because they had no way of saving the card, then proceed to hire USADA for Morales-Garcia and doing test after test until Morales could come out clean and not notifying the NYSAC?Yet no one in the mainstream boxing media questioned their continued relationship with boxing. Main question I would ask them in the matter of the IV:

--How did Mayweather qualify for a TUE in the IV matter when we know their guidelines highly discourage it for something like dehydration and make a case for oral treatment being the medically preferred option?

--The record of tests administered to Mayweather don't indicate he was tested on May 1st, which contradicts the story of him being tested before and after the IV was administered, why?

NSAC hires and keeps employing and defending judges that have a history of major screw ups that indicate either corruption or incompetence, fighters going over their authority with impunity(like Mayweather refusing the comission approved gloves that Maidana was going to use in the first fight), pityful drug testing standards... in the matter of the Mayweather IV:

--- Why uphold an illegal retroactive TUE when you had no idea of it even being needed for 19 days?how could you possibly check it's validity when you didn't evaluate if Mayweather qualified for it?

To Mayweather:

--- Why cite blood draining as the reason for dehydration when records show he wasn't tested in the 10 days prior to the weigh in?

--- Did USADA try to dissuade him from the use of the IV treatment?

The mainstream boxing media are just too concerned about getting their credentials pulled that they forgot the word journalism...

[Rath]

Floyd fans built their case around USADA and NSAC's statement that Floyd did nothing wrong.

they will spin it from there.

[radioraheem]

When I said they were fine, I meant that when Floyd, I mean Lance, was rumored to be on PEDs, the officials said he passed all his tests and did nothing wrong.

Lance said that he had nothing to hide and it was all HARD WORK.

Sound familiar?

So are you implying an athlete that is rumored to be on PEDs is in fact on PEDs? That athlete can't possibly be clean, correct?

[Rath]

So are you implying an athlete that is rumored to be on PEDs is in fact on PEDs? That athlete can't possibly be clean, correct?

only for those athlete who has been tested by USADA for years.

thought that trap will work do you?