Manny Pacquiao Vs Timothy Bradley 2 & Undercards Master Discussion Thread

[T18Z]

The names is exactly what I'm after...do you know them? Or was the whole thing all smoke and mirrors to cover up HBO's blatant biasness. This is also why I asked you how you scored the fight. Cause every one of your arguments seem to be supported by HBO IMO. Maybe you never heard of slight of mouth to fool the masses...

Right, so now this is HBO bias? What about the people ringside who scored the fight for Pacquaio? (99% btw) They didn't have HBO commentary, but let me guess, they're also bias?

Should I turn the sound off, put my socks on and also turn all the lights off in my house, will that make me less bias?

So, let me ask, what do you think of the 5 judges all scoring it for Pacquaio? Were they paid off? All wrong? Deluded? How is everyone of my arguments supported by HBO dumb@ss? HBO commentary doesn't effect compubox, they don't listen to the commentators. Also HBO don't own the WBO judges, they didn't control the re-scoring or the punch statistics.

Lastly, are you so ignorant you actually believe you're smarter than 99.9% of the boxing population who scored it for Pacquaio? Do you think you're some intellectual anomaly who has seen something others haven't? Like you're somehow immune from any form of bias yourself towards Bradley? Get a grip, really.

[jas]

Yes, I agree

Props to you sir, green k sent.

[DARKSEID]

I wasn't going to order this fight because fuck Bob Arum

But after seeing Bradley in the best shape I ever seen him and Pacquiao going hard in his training camp, I have no choice. I have to buy it.

[-MEGA-]

Right, so now this is HBO bias? What about the people ringside who scored the fight for Pacquaio? (99% btw) They didn't have HBO commentary, but let me guess, they're also bias?

Should I turn the sound off, put my socks on and also turn all the lights off in my house, will that make me less bias?

So, let me ask, what do you think of the 5 judges all scoring it for Pacquaio? Were they paid off? All wrong? Deluded? How is everyone of my arguments supported by HBO dumb@ss? HBO commentary doesn't effect compubox, they don't listen to the commentators. Also HBO don't own the WBO judges, they didn't control the re-scoring or the punch statistics.

Lastly, are you so ignorant you actually believe you're smarter than 99.9% of the boxing population who scored it for Pacquaio? Do you think you're some intellectual anomaly who has seen something others haven't? Like you're somehow immune from any form of bias yourself towards Bradley? Get a grip, really.

Ok fella take a seat, schools in session....

As to paragraph one. HBO is biased! That was one of the first things to come out after all this.

Are you claiming their not? Y/N please

Paragraph 2: you could turn your tv upside down and watch it backwards in a mirror, I don't give a Sh it!

Paragraph 3: again who are these 5 judges? Why weren't their names out out there so people could know who "rescored" the fight. That might give people more security. My belief is that the fight was never rescored it was all "smoke and mirrors". Compubox? please they are just as much a part of HBO and can be manipulated too.

Lastly, your "99%" theory. As I've said maybe you've never heard the term slight of mouth/tongue or hand. The masses are easily fooled and I'm sorry your one of them. In this case people were fooled into thinking it was a one sided fight, a blowout. Which is simply not true. But as for the other one percent. No matter how they scored it, they had it a close fight because they use their own knowledge and come to their own conclusions...

Class dismissed...go play now!

[jas]

Storm troopers are delusional.

[Dr Rumack]

Apparently Roach had a box full of socks delivered to Bradley.

This note was attached:

To me, you are boxing's number one*sox symbol. Please think of me not as your arch-nemesis*but as your sole supporter. I hope the enclosed gift helps with the heeling process."

[PACnPBFsuck]

I wasn't going to order this fight because fuck Bob Arum

But after seeing Bradley in the best shape I ever seen him and Pacquiao going hard in his training camp, I have no choice. I have to buy it.

Real Talk

[jas]

Apparently Roach had a box full of socks delivered to Bradley.

This note was attached:

Haha the puns are endless!

[T18Z]

Ok fella take a seat, schools in session....

As to paragraph one. HBO is biased! That was one of the first things to come out after all this. - No real proof except evidently biased youtube videos made by fans like you.

Are you claiming their not? Y/N please - I believe there are a very small amount of mistakes in every fight, however I do not believe it was the work of bias, nor do I believe it is enough to make the statistics flawed.

Paragraph 2: you could turn your tv upside down and watch it backwards in a mirror, I don't give a Sh it! - Then shut the hell up about bias if you don't care how people watch it.

Paragraph 3: again who are these 5 judges? Why weren't their names out out there so people could know who "rescored" the fight. That might give people more security. My belief is that the fight was never rescored it was all "smoke and mirrors". Compubox? please they are just as much a part of HBO and can be manipulated too. - The fact you believe the fight was never re-scored showes how really incompetent you are, smoke and mirrors? What are you, 10? Do you also think 9/11 was a conspiracy and the president is an alien too?

Lastly, your "99%" theory. As I've said maybe you've never heard the term slight of mouth/tongue or hand. The masses are easily fooled and I'm sorry your one of them. In this case people were fooled into thinking it was a one sided fight, a blowout. Which is simply not true. But as for the other one percent. No matter how they scored it, they had it a close fight because they use their own knowledge and come to their own conclusions... - So I'm right, you think you're smarter than you actually are. You think you know more than experts in boxing, and believe everyone else is missing something, except for you. You provide no logic to your arguments, you use no facts, nothing. Whenever I do, you state 'smoke and mirrors'.

Once again compubox isn't affected by HBO whatsoever, nor is the WBO, but let me guess, they're bias?

Class dismissed...go play now! - Yeah, class is dismissed, and you failed, as expected. If you're going to attempt to 'take someone to school' then you should probably at least use some actual relevant facts and think logically, instead of acting like a 12 year old conspiracy theory fool.

Sessions over, enjoy your play time.

Read the above.

[-MEGA-]

Read the above.

Just how I figured you'd respond. With a whole lot of nothing and name calling. Shows your true intellect, as I made reference to.
You could argue all day that PAC won...but he didn't!
You could refer to compubox as a mathematical truth...but it isn't!
You could argue 5 judges rescored the fight for PAC...but he still lost.
Your argument overlooks one key thing PAC didn't win officially. But I understand your argument is so that history is kind to PAC. That's cool, I'm a fan of his too. But the next time you argue you should put your own thought into it, not something you've read or seen on tv....