Manny Pacquiao Vs Timothy Bradley 2 & Undercards Master Discussion Thread

[Rome-By-Ko]

I can't wait for PAC to remove his tooth and become PACmonster/Tax from lonely toons..

[KRITKL]

Just heard about this.
Tim is going all out getting ready for this fight, can't wait!
One thing I did notice, is Tim always that slow when he does mitts and shadow boxes?
Hope he's holding back or something if not Manny's going to light him up.
This fight has got me fcuking pumped! Just got confirmation that I'm going to be off work, time to make some phone calls!

[champion4ever]

You mean the 5 world class judges who reviewed the fight and all had Pacquaio winning unanimously? Also Pacquaio has never admitted he didn't do enough to win dumbo, he said he was compassionate towards Bradley as the fight progressed because he was getting outclassed, BIG DIFFERENCE.

All signs point to Pacquaio winning, you are not a genius, you do not know better than 99.9% of the world, stop being an idiot.

It's a real shame that no one has ever taught you any manners. Why all the name calling? I've never insulted you or called you out your name personally. I am only stating my opinions and just a few facts.

Also as far as those 5 world class judges are concerned they weren't scoring the fight at ringside. They had the luxury of reviewing it on tape. It's much different when you are a judge, judging a fight live as opposed to tape because you could hear the full impact of the combatants in the boxing ring.

In addition, If Pac truly believed that he had done enough in order to secure the win in the first fight, then why mess with a successful formula? Just repeat the same losing performance as he had done previously with a new set of judges.

Lastly, I advise you to go back and view how the three official judges scored the first fight. The fight was hanging in the balances and hinged on the last third of the fight, in which Bradley dominated and where Pac appeared to coast. That's why we got the controversial decision we have today. If you don't believe me then just Google it and you will see for yourself exactly what I am talking about.

[T18Z]

It's a real shame that no one has ever taught you any manners. Why all the name calling? I've never insulted you or called you out your name personally. I am only stating my opinions and just a few facts.

Also as far as those 5 world class judges are concerned they weren't scoring the fight at ringside. They had the luxury of reviewing it on tape. It's much different when you are a judge, judging a fight live as opposed to tape because you could hear the full impact of the combatants in the boxing ring.

In addition, If Pac truly believed that he had done enough in order to secure the win in the first fight, then why mess with a successful formula? Just repeat the same losing performance as he had done previously with a new set of judges.

Lastly, I advise you to go back and view how the three official judges scored the first fight. The fight was hanging in the balances and hinged on the last third of the fight, in which Bradley dominated and where Pac appeared to coast. That's why we got the controversial decision we have today. If you don't believe me then just Google it and you will see for yourself exactly what I am talking about.

It's a shame nobody ever taught you common sense or logical thinking. I don't care if you get upset, it's true.

[champion4ever]

I got a simple yes or no answer question for you. Failure to answer in Yes or No will result in automatic defeat in the debate, complete loss of credibility as a poster and severe repercussions as to how posters view you from a respect standpoint.

Now here we go....

I would rather land 100 punches more than my opponent as opposed to throwing 100 punches more than him. Do you agree? Remember, 1 word answer of yes or no .

Yes, I agree

[-MEGA-]

You mean the 5 world class judges who reviewed the fight and all had Pacquaio winning unanimously? Also Pacquaio has never admitted he didn't do enough to win dumbo, he said he was compassionate towards Bradley as the fight progressed because he was getting outclassed, BIG DIFFERENCE.

All signs point to Pacquaio winning, you are not a genius, you do not know better than 99.9% of the world, stop being an idiot.

Can you name these 5 "world class judges" please or show me a link to said judges?

[PACnPBFsuck]

I'm changing over to Team Bradley by decision, Bradley is putting out that hard work and dedication, I'm on board.

I can definitely respect that.

[sugarsmosley]

I can't wait for PAC to remove his tooth and become PACmonster/Tax from lonely toons..

lol what

[T18Z]

Can you name these 5 "world class judges" please or show me a link to said judges?

I'll remove the words world class then, and just state 5 obviously competent judges. Don't bother acting like you actually require their names, because it doesn't matter. 5-0 is the end result.

Let me guess, they got paid off though?

WBO President Francisco "Paco" Valcarcel said five judges, from New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Pennsylvania and Puerto Rico, will re-score the bout and submit their work confidentially to the WBO, with the scores to be gathered by Monday.

The five officials, from all over the world, sat down and viewed a video of the fight earlier this week. The 5-man WBO judging panel rescored the fight for Pacquiao, by a landslide. The scores were 115-111, 116-112, 117-111, 118-110, 117-111, essentially scoring eight or more rounds to the Filipino fighter.

[-MEGA-]

I'll remove the words world class then, and just state 5 obviously competent judges. Don't bother acting like you actually require their names, because it doesn't matter. 5-0 is the end result.

Let me guess, they got paid off though?

The names is exactly what I'm after...do you know them? Or was the whole thing all smoke and mirrors to cover up HBO's blatant biasness. This is also why I asked you how you scored the fight. Cause every one of your arguments seem to be supported by HBO IMO. Maybe you never heard of slight of mouth to fool the masses...