Manny Pacquiao Vs Timothy Bradley 2 & Undercards Master Discussion Thread

[Carpe Diem]

Anyone knows when they'll have their media day workout? It should be tomorrow or Friday because they'll be in Vegas next week.

[jas]

bradley is getting announced 2nd right? is he walking to the ring 2nd as well?

[jas]

[poeticlsykuac]

Excellent breakdown of the first fight from Lee Wylie

This is undoubtedly the best analysis of the fight I've watched. Most detailed and holds the most value. It showed a lot more things that Bradley did.

Love it.... Found it on youtube yesterday after that first vid I posted.

[jas]

[poeticlsykuac]

Is anyone arguing that they weren't bias? They almost always are.
Still doesn't change the fact Tim shouldn't of won the fight.

After watching that and Wylie Lee's analysis go re-watch and re-score the fight. I'm not saying you won't have Pac winning but you may just see how someone could score so highly on Bradley since the art of the "Sweet Science" is hit and don't be hit. Well that video shows a lot of those "big moments" that "stole" rounds were nothing but misses while Bradley controlled the entire round. SO in essence those awful misses and flurries were giving credit to BRADLEY since Pacman missed.... meaning they build more of a case to give Bradley a round while taking more away from Pacman. I can see how Bradley sees himself winning the fight 8-4, it's simple.... for 8 out of those 12 rounds he hit and didn't get hit better... I'd say Pac had a great 4 rounds in the middle but the majority of the fight Pac was missing in the majority of the rounds while Bradley wasn't. There was a noticeable difference in pac's effectiveness when Bradley was bothered by his feet in the middle of the rounds, then as the adrenaline allowed him to ignore the pain he again took over winning the last 3 rounds by the old "I hit you and you missed me" tactic.

I think this match was a lot closer then people realize because people don't realize it's not about you hearing the announcer say big blow when on camera it was an obvious miss. When you are objective and score points for defense and offense that makes it pretty simple on who won the fight if you count rounds and not listen to the bone head announcers. I do believe Pacman threw and landed the harder punches in the fight but I also believe he landed a LOT less punches then "compubox" says. I also feel when you look at who "won more rounds" it's Bradley, where as when I look at who won the "fight" I'd say Pacman landed the bigger punches.... Bradley simply won the Match.

I think all those announcers seriously hurt people and it's bull **** that they have a job... they themselves created controversy there was none imo.

[jas]

[jas]

[jas]

[Evol]

PAC on jimmy kimmel with our very own president clinton..