Manny Pacquiao Vs Timothy Bradley 2 & Undercards Master Discussion Thread

[KRITKL]

Posted for truth..Tim is the truth..

really.......how can you take that interview seriously????
which one of you stormtroopers was interviewing him
comedy......the same replay of the only 3 punches he landedseriously??..
I think he lands 3 punches in my sig....
Damn, you guys are getting desperate at least Tim was trying to keep it real, but that guy interviewing him....WTF?those was the most biased, BS questions ever.
Do you guys really believe people think Pac won because HBO made it sound like he did?

[JOM'S]

the moment of truth is getting closer bros!!!

[jas]

Bradley hits the survival button around round 6.

[champion4ever]

After re-watching and unofficially scoring the Bradley vs Pac I bout for the first time, I am more than convinced that the judges were correct in their decision. There was no corruption, incompetence or conspiracy involved as others would have many fight fans to believe because I scored the fight the same identical way 115-113. So I can understand how they scored the bout for Timothy Bradley. The fight was so close that the decision could have gone in favor of either fighter or even ruled a draw for that matter .

From my observation, what probably convinced the official judges of Timothy Bradley superiority as in the Ruslan Provodnikov fight, was his volume punching and work rate; That's without even mentioning his chin and will power. For the first three and half rounds before rolling his ankle, Bradley was constantly beating Pac to the punch. He was just getting his punches off first. For his part however, Manny was the harder and more accurate puncher while Bradley was the busier puncher.

After four rounds, I had the fight even. After eight rounds I had Pac leading 5-3. However, what arguably cost Manny the decision is that Bradley swept the last third of the fight; As I had him winning the last four rounds 9-12.

In my opinion, the main difference in this fight was Pac's lack of punching power. He was unable to hurt or even stop Timothy as was witnessed in previous fights with other opponents, like De La Hoya, Hatton and Cotto. However on this night his power was con****uously absent.

Another thing I observed is that there was some furious exchanges between the two. Pac appeared to have landed some of his best and most monstrous power punches against Bradley's chin that typically floors opponents but on this night, it was to no avail as Timothy just simply ate them and gave them back as good as he got them.

In closing, judging a professional prizefight is a very subjective process. After all, judges are human who may have unique or different values. Like all of us they have their certain favorites, likes and dislikes. In this particular fight, they liked Bradley's style more, They preferred his work rate and volume punching over Manny Pac's accurate and combination punching.

[Rome-By-Ko]

[Rome-By-Ko]

[JOM'S]

for sure these goes for both fighters, victory here would be so much sweeter and open up their options exponentially ...

[T18Z]

After re-watching and unofficially scoring the Bradley vs Pac I bout for the first time, I am more than convinced that the judges were correct in their decision. There was no corruption, incompetence or conspiracy involved as others would have many fight fans to believe because I scored the fight the same identical way 115-113. So I can understand how they scored the bout for Timothy Bradley. The fight was so close that the decision could have gone in favor of either fighter or even ruled a draw for that matter .

From my observation, what probably convinced the official judges of Timothy Bradley superiority as in the Ruslan Provodnikov fight, was his volume punching and work rate; That's without even mentioning his chin and will power. For the first three and half rounds before rolling his ankle, Bradley was constantly beating Pac to the punch. He was just getting his punches off first. For his part however, Manny was the harder and more accurate puncher while Bradley was the busier puncher.

After four rounds, I had the fight even. After eight rounds I had Pac leading 5-3. However, what arguably cost Manny the decision is that Bradley swept the last third of the fight; As I had him winning the last four rounds 9-12.

In my opinion, the main difference in this fight was Pac's lack of punching power. He was unable to hurt or even stop Timothy as was witnessed in previous fights with other opponents, like De La Hoya, Hatton and Cotto. However on this night his power was con****uously absent.

Another thing I observed is that there was some furious exchanges between the two. Pac appeared to have landed some of his best and most monstrous power punches against Bradley's chin that typically floors opponents but on this night, it was to no avail as Timothy just simply ate them and gave them back as good as he got them.

In closing, judging a professional prizefight is a very subjective process. After all, judges are human who may have unique or different values. Like all of us they have their certain favorites, likes and dislikes. In this particular fight, they liked Bradley's style more, They preferred his work rate and volume punching over Manny Pac's accurate and combination punching.

Work rate a volume doesn't mean crap if you don't land, why can't Bradley fans admit nothing supports his victory?

Also, Pacquaio won the exchanges, but the fact you give Bradley credit for getting beaten in these exchanges but not getting majorly hurt is laughable. So you get points for getting punched on the chin and standing up to it? Everyone should fight like Chavez Jr. then...

Another person who believes Bradley could've won is exposed as an idiot. You're essentially doing what one of the judges did and negatively effecting his scoring 'because he isn't knocking Bradley out' like he did to everyone else... how lame.

[Dr Rumack]

for sure these goes for both fighters, victory here would be so much sweeter and open up their options exponentially ...

You mean they could fight Ruslan, Marquez, or Alvarado?

[-MEGA-]

Work rate a volume doesn't mean crap if you don't land, why can't Bradley fans admit nothing supports his victory?

Also, Pacquaio won the exchanges, but the fact you give Bradley credit for getting beaten in these exchanges but not getting majorly hurt is laughable. So you get points for getting punched on the chin and standing up to it? Everyone should fight like Chavez Jr. then...

Another person who believes Bradley could've won is exposed as an idiot. You're essentially doing what one of the judges did and negatively effecting his scoring 'because he isn't knocking Bradley out' like he did to everyone else... how lame.

I bet you scored it 11-1 PAC....