Comments Thread For: Timothy Bradley: Marquez Is the Best Fighter I've Faced

[The Big Dunn]

Tarver > RJJ
Junior Jones > Barrera
Norton = Ali

I understand why you wouldn't wanna revisit what was a debacle for you, but where we left off is with a question mark on whether JMM's 2nd best wins belongs in Pac's top 10. That tells the whole story.

those fights have nothing to do with JMM v Manny series and the way the writers feel about who won each fight.

no, you made a statement, then when we made you aware ofthat you didn't realize JMM beat MAB as well, you changed your point and wouldn't admit yu made a mistake. same thing when we discussed the writers opinion of the 2nd jmm manny fight you mistook plurality for majority. so I don' see a point to continue.

[oneon11]

Manny supporters are like politicians, they just don't see the truth even when its being told to them time & time again. Marquez will be the toughest fight for Tim, since the only punches Manny was landing on Tim was tbose phantom blows that only could be seen by Manny supporters & HBO's Larry, Jim & Max. If it wasn't for Roy Jones screaming a d I'll quote " Ooooooohhhhhhhhhb, He's not getting up Jim, He's not getting up Jim, He's not getting up"..........Upon hearing that Jim had no other choice but to follow up and say" He's been knocked out" Hahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaha................

As a matter of fact I'm going to go watch the third and sixth round again just to hear Roy Jones & laugh my ass off at seeing Manny sleeping on the job....... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[HeroBando]

those fights have nothing to do with JMM v Manny series and the way the writers feel about who won each fight.

no, you made a statement, then when we made you aware ofthat you didn't realize JMM beat MAB as well, you changed your point and wouldn't admit yu made a mistake. same thing when we discussed the writers opinion of the 2nd jmm manny fight you mistook plurality for majority. so I don' see a point to continue.

Looks like you don't know what you're talking about again:

"A majority means that more than 50% of the voters voted for the person or issue in question. ". I was right and you we wrong, and wrong again to dispute it. You wish I said plurality, but I didn't. Or you're mistaking one for the other.

2. I didn't know about JMM MAB lol. You don't know that "when" matters, not only "who"? And in parallel you were arguing Morales was not a good win for Pac. GTFO

[Elotero]

Tarver > RJJ
Junior Jones > Barrera
Norton = Ali

I understand why you wouldn't wanna revisit what was a debacle for you, but where we left off is with a question mark on whether JMM's 2nd best wins belongs in Pac's top 10. That tells the whole story.

The only story it tells is how badly you wish to discredit JMM for tranquilizing Pac.

Top ten schmop ten.. Jmm put Pac to sleep when it mattered most. Cherry on top baby.

Btw.. Junior Jones was better than Barrera. I recall a rematch happening and Barrera lost that fight as well.

[The Big Dunn]

Looks like you don't know what you're talking about again:

"A majority means that more than 50% of the voters voted for the person or issue in question. ". I was right and you we wrong, and wrong again to dispute it. You wish I said plurality, but I didn't. Or you're mistaking one for the other.

2. I didn't know about JMM MAB lol. You don't know that "when" matters, not only "who"? And in parallel you were arguing Morales was not a good win for Pac. GTFO

but more than 50% didn't vote that manny won. you combined manny winning votes with draw votes. there were 3 choices, not 2.

I said the Morales win was overrated because Morales was 4-7 after the raheem fight. Manny beat Morales after raheem beat him. IMO he wasn't the same morales and i think his record and the competition shows that.

[HeroBando]

The only story it tells is how badly you wish to discredit JMM for tranquilizing Pac.

Top ten schmop ten.. Jmm put Pac to sleep when it mattered most. Cherry on top baby.

Btw.. Junior Jones was better than Barrera. I recall a rematch happening and Barrera lost that fight as well.

He certainly was h2h, but you don't mean all time? That's my point, get it?

Thanks for conceding JMM's resume << Pac's. That's what counts when talking who's better, else soon enough you're ranking Norton and Tarver as ATGs, and Danny Green might have a claim

[citynation]

Hey Tim, fight marquez FIRST, then say he's the "best' fighter you've fought. Every time Bradley or JMM is interviewed they mention Pacman. It's as if there entire careers are based off of 'beating' manny.(Tim definitely didn't beat manny, that was a gift decision) Styles make fights. Tim and JMM know if they rematched pacman, that they have a high chance of losing. JMM said it best, he said he doesn't want to mess up the way he beat pacman with rematch...meaning he doesn't want to risk losing again. Cowards. Mean while Jmm trolled pacman for three rematches....SMH...

[The Big Dunn]

He certainly was h2h, but you don't mean all time? That's my point, get it?

Thanks for conceding JMM's resume << Pac's. That's what counts when talking who's better, else soon enough you're ranking Norton and Tarver as ATGs, and Danny Green might have a claim

thats what counts when they haven't fought each other, especially 4 times. In those situations you look at who won. If the decisions are disputed, you can look to the media scorecards for more insight.

[HeroBando]

but more than 50% didn't vote that manny won. you combined manny winning votes with draw votes. there were 3 choices, not 2.

I said the Morales win was overrated because Morales was 4-7 after the raheem fight. Manny beat Morales after raheem beat him. IMO he wasn't the same morales and i think his record and the competition shows that.

I said "a majority did NOT have JMM winning". That's me dis*****g someone else's claim that a significant majority did. I was 100% right, and it's pathetic you're still hung up on this, and can't stop being wrong about it.

So if "when" matters, not only "who", for Morales, how can you rate JMM's MAB win much better than Pac's MAB 2, which most don't have top 10? Especially taking into account the manner of win (per Cliff).

[HeroBando]

thats what counts when they haven't fought each other, especially 4 times. In those situations you look at who won. If the decisions are disputed, you can look to the media scorecards for more insight.

oh 4 is the cutoff? 3 times not enough for Norton and Tarver, or 2 clear cut for Jones? It's not like Jones needed 4 chances to show his h2h superiority, it was there each time.